Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC (Bv Clients)

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 3 clients • 7 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

MacMillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC (BV Clients) has handled 475 career applications, primarily focused on the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 84.47 percent, demonstrating its ability to secure patent rights for its clients. This percentage serves as a benchmark for the firm's success in this specific sector.

The average number of office actions per allowance is 2.48, which quantifies the typical engagement with patent examiners. Currently, the firm is managing 6 pending office actions. This workload reflects the firm's ongoing responsibility for applications currently under review at the patent office.

With 475 career applications and an 84.47 percent resolved allowance rate, the firm shows a consistent history in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The 2.48 average office actions per allowance provides a baseline for the expected complexity of the prosecution cycle. These data points summarize the firm's experience and current activity levels.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=475 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.5%
Allowance Rate
n=475
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=475
2.5
OAs to Allowance
n=261
-0.65σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=261
997 days
Time to Allowance
n=261
+7.2pp
Interview Lift
n=475
15.2%
RCE Rate
n=475
1.8%
Appeal Rate
n=475

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=17 (min 20)
74.2%
§102 Overcome
n=124
79.2%
§103 Overcome
n=168
80.4%
§112 Overcome
n=112

Specialization & Scale

A61B, A61F, Y10T
Top CPC Subclasses
16%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=475
0
Practitioners
n=475
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=475 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (86%)
1
Medium (14%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (86%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
86% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 1 68.5% +48.1%
LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 1 73.8% +29.9%
WEISS, JESSICA 1 81.0% +32.8%
HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY 1 77.7% +19.1%
HESTON, JUSTIN MICHAEL 1 81.2% +20.5%
ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO 1 61.3% +35.1%
BATES, DAVID W 1 76.4% +16.7%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19382853 Expandable Spacer with Internal Expansion Actuator MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L —
19324731 IMPROVEMENTS IN BONE SCREWS LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES —
19228140 Expandable Intervertebral Spacers WEISS, JESSICA —
19056197 Intervertebral Spacers HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY —
19045729 WATERCRAFT COMPONENTS THAT INCLUDE A FLUID SYSTEM HESTON, JUSTIN MICHAEL —
18794430 HOLDERS, KITS, AND METHODS ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18196210 Orthopedic Screw with Radiolucent and Radiopaque Thread Portions BATES, DAVID W 11d overdue
19382853 Expandable Spacer with Internal Expansion Actuator MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L —
19324731 IMPROVEMENTS IN BONE SCREWS LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES —
19228140 Expandable Intervertebral Spacers WEISS, JESSICA —
19056197 Intervertebral Spacers HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY —
19045729 WATERCRAFT COMPONENTS THAT INCLUDE A FLUID SYSTEM HESTON, JUSTIN MICHAEL —
18794430 HOLDERS, KITS, AND METHODS ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Degen Medical, Inc. 3
GLW 3
Coflow Jet, LLC 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37732
36191
37751
37361
37991

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19382853 Expandable Spacer with Internal Expansion Actuator Degen Medical, Inc. MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 3773 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 07, 2025
19324731 IMPROVEMENTS IN BONE SCREWS Glw, Inc. LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 3619 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2025
19228140 Expandable Intervertebral Spacers Degen Medical, Inc. WEISS, JESSICA 3775 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 04, 2025
19056197 Intervertebral Spacers Degen Medical, Inc. HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY 3773 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 18, 2025
19045729 WATERCRAFT COMPONENTS THAT INCLUDE A FLUID SYSTEM Coflow Jet, LLC HESTON, JUSTIN MICHAEL §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 05, 2025
18794430 HOLDERS, KITS, AND METHODS Glw, Inc. ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO 3736 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 05, 2024
18196210 Orthopedic Screw with Radiolucent and Radiopaque Thread Portions Glw, Inc. BATES, DAVID W 3799 §103 Non-Final OA 11d overdue Pending May 11, 2023

Managing Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC (Bv Clients)'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC (Bv Clients)'s patent allowance rate?

84.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC (Bv Clients) were allowed, across 475 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC (Bv Clients) average before allowance?

2.48 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC (Bv Clients) have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 7 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month