Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Mahamedi Ip Law LLP (Uber)

12 pending office actions • 1 client • 12 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=585 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.4%
Allowance Rate
n=585
+0.64σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=585
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=411
-0.24σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=411
919 days
Time to Allowance
n=411
-1.6pp
Interview Lift
n=585
31.3%
RCE Rate
n=585
3.8%
Appeal Rate
n=585

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

63.6%
§101 Overcome
n=44
81.0%
§102 Overcome
n=58
79.8%
§103 Overcome
n=253
100.0%
§112 Overcome
n=21

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, H04W, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
52%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=585
0
Practitioners
n=585
Apps / Practitioner
n=585 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (8%)
7
Medium (58%)
2
Easy (17%)
2
Unknown (17%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§103 only5 (42%)
§102 only2 (17%)
Double-patenting only2 (17%)
No statute on record2 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
8% of docket
1
Communications
8% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
2
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ELCHANTI, ZEINA 1 63.9% +25.4%
HUYNH, LUAT T 1 93.0% +8.6%
KEEHN, RICHARD G 1 79.5% +15.4%
CASS, JEAN PAUL 1 73.1% +25.3%
WOO, ANDREW M 1 82.7% +45.0%
BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE 1 22.8% +27.1%
LAU, HOI CHING 1 74.4% +16.1%
SWARTZ, STEPHEN S 1 31.3% +25.5%
HAN, CHARLES J 1 68.8% +42.5%
STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R 1 37.4% +30.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19030854 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING MULTIVARIATE OPTIMIZATIONS BASED ON LOCATION DATA HUYNH, LUAT T

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18737802 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING AN ON-DEMAND TRANSPORT ARRANGEMENT SERVICE FOR RECHARGING OF VEHICLES STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R 38d overdue
18961227 NETWORK SYSTEM TO UTILIZE MATCHING OF BACKUPS FOR JOB ORDERS BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18892090 DYNAMIC ROUTE RECOMMENDATION FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS HAN, CHARLES J 42d overdue
18737802 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING AN ON-DEMAND TRANSPORT ARRANGEMENT SERVICE FOR RECHARGING OF VEHICLES STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R 38d overdue
18925847 VEHICLE MONITORING SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING ALERTS TO DRIVERS LAU, HOI CHING 36d overdue
19012716 PREDICTION ENGINE FOR A NETWORK-BASED SERVICE WOO, ANDREW M 25d overdue
18902378 NETWORK SYSTEM TO DETERMINE A ROUTE BASED ON TIMING DATA SWARTZ, STEPHEN S 41d
19173365 ON-DEMAND TRANSPORT SERVICES ELCHANTI, ZEINA
19030835 PREDICTIVE LOCATION SELECTION SYSTEM KEEHN, RICHARD G
19030845 COMPUTER SYSTEM ARRANGING TRANSPORT SERVICES FOR USERS BASED ON THE ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL INFORMATION CASS, JEAN PAUL

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Uber Technologies, Inc. 12

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36671
36661
24411
36241
26891
36251
36651
36231
36691
36261

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19173365 ON-DEMAND TRANSPORT SERVICES Uber Technologies, Inc. ELCHANTI, ZEINA Non-Final OA Pending Apr 08, 2025
19030854 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING MULTIVARIATE OPTIMIZATIONS BASED ON LOCATION DATA Uber Technologies, Inc. HUYNH, LUAT T 3667 §102 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 17, 2025
19030835 PREDICTIVE LOCATION SELECTION SYSTEM Uber Technologies, Inc. KEEHN, RICHARD G §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 17, 2025
19030845 COMPUTER SYSTEM ARRANGING TRANSPORT SERVICES FOR USERS BASED ON THE ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL INFORMATION Uber Technologies, Inc. CASS, JEAN PAUL 3666 DP Non-Final OA Pending Jan 17, 2025
19012716 PREDICTION ENGINE FOR A NETWORK-BASED SERVICE Uber Technologies, Inc. WOO, ANDREW M 2441 Non-Final OA 25d overdue Pending Jan 07, 2025
18961227 NETWORK SYSTEM TO UTILIZE MATCHING OF BACKUPS FOR JOB ORDERS Uber Technologies, Inc. BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE 3624 §102 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 26, 2024
18925847 VEHICLE MONITORING SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING ALERTS TO DRIVERS Uber Technologies, Inc. LAU, HOI CHING 2689 §103 Non-Final OA 36d overdue Pending Oct 24, 2024
18902378 NETWORK SYSTEM TO DETERMINE A ROUTE BASED ON TIMING DATA Uber Technologies, Inc. SWARTZ, STEPHEN S 3625 §103 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Sep 30, 2024
18892090 DYNAMIC ROUTE RECOMMENDATION FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS Uber Technologies, Inc. HAN, CHARLES J 3665 §103 Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Sep 20, 2024
18737802 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING AN ON-DEMAND TRANSPORT ARRANGEMENT SERVICE FOR RECHARGING OF VEHICLES Uber Technologies, Inc. STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R 3623 §101 Final Rejection 38d overdue Pending Jun 07, 2024
18658236 NETWORK COMPUTER SYSTEM TO POSITION SERVICE PROVIDERS USING PROVISIONING LEVEL DETERMINATIONS Uber Technologies, Inc. HUTCHINSON, ALAN D 3669 DP Final Rejection Pending May 08, 2024
17957892 CONFIGURING INFRASTRUCTURE OF A NETWORK SERVICE BASED ON IMPACT TO AN ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN Uber Technologies, Inc. GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER 3626 §103 Final Rejection Pending Sep 30, 2022

Managing Mahamedi Ip Law LLP (Uber)'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month