Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe manages 361 career applications in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 91.13 percent for these applications. At present, there are 4 pending office actions that the firm is actively prosecuting. The average number of office actions per allowance is 3.77.

This 3.77 average indicates that the firm engages in rounds of communication with examiners to secure a grant. With 361 career applications and a 91.13 percent allowance rate, the firm has shown an ability to navigate the Chemistry & Materials sector. The 4 pending office actions currently on its docket represent the latest phase of this prosecution history. For a practitioner, the 3.77 average and the 4 pending office actions define the current active requirements.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=361 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.1%
Allowance Rate
n=361
+0.63σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=361
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=257
+0.12σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=257
1093 days
Time to Allowance
n=257
+6.1pp
Interview Lift
n=361
31.6%
RCE Rate
n=361
1.4%
Appeal Rate
n=361

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=17 (min 20)
88.5%
§102 Overcome
n=104
90.3%
§103 Overcome
n=175
90.5%
§112 Overcome
n=137

Specialization & Scale

A61B, A61M, Y10T
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=361
0
Practitioners
n=361
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=361 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (60%)
2
Easy (40%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
§102 only2 (40%)
§112 only2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN 1 63.7% +24.3%
LANE, DANIEL E 1 3.8% +8.3%
GRAY, PHILLIP A 1 74.1% +10.8%
NORRIS, CLAIRE A 1 66.0% +27.9%
RAMSEY, JEREMY C 1 52.6% +46.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18932765 COMPACT LUNG SIMULATOR AND SYSTEM LANE, DANIEL E —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17796027 Rail system RAMSEY, JEREMY C 138d overdue
19241470 System and Method for Uniform Ion Milling MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN —
18735223 Adjustable Placket Closure System GRAY, PHILLIP A —
18663440 SUPPLEMENTAL FILTRATION FOR MACHINE FLUID SYSTEMS NORRIS, CLAIRE A —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17941
37831
17791
36341

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19241470 System and Method for Uniform Ion Milling E.A. Fischione Instruments, Inc. MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN 1794 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 18, 2025
18932765 COMPACT LUNG SIMULATOR AND SYSTEM Ingmar Medical, LLC LANE, DANIEL E §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18735223 Adjustable Placket Closure System Gus Gear, Inc. GRAY, PHILLIP A 3783 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 06, 2024
18663440 SUPPLEMENTAL FILTRATION FOR MACHINE FLUID SYSTEMS Rpm Industries, LLC NORRIS, CLAIRE A 1779 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 14, 2024
17796027 Rail system Tractive Motion Technologies Pty Ltd RAMSEY, JEREMY C 3634 §112 Final Rejection 138d overdue Pending Jul 28, 2022

Managing Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe's patent allowance rate?

91.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe were allowed, across 361 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe average before allowance?

3.77 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 5 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month