Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Mh2 Technology Law Group, LLP (With Hjf)

5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 4 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=74 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.0%
Allowance Rate
n=74
+0.92σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=74
4.6
OAs to Allowance
n=34
+0.21σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=34
1234 days
Time to Allowance
n=34
+22.1pp
Interview Lift
n=74
33.3%
RCE Rate
n=74
3.3%
Appeal Rate
n=74

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
§102 Overcome
n=4 (min 20)
69.0%
§103 Overcome
n=29
§112 Overcome
n=9 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61P, C07K
Top CPC Subclasses
64%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=74
0
Practitioners
n=74
Apps / Practitioner
n=74 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
5
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
80% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 2 45.9% +40.8%
POLAND, CHERIE MICHELLE 1 59.1% +33.7%
BAUSCH, SARAE L 1 29.6% +44.2%
SISSON, BRADLEY L 1 19.8% +20.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17312248 GENOMIC REARRANGEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROSTATE CANCER AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME SISSON, BRADLEY L 42d overdue
17909500 DNA DAMAGE REPAIR GENES IN CANCER BAUSCH, SARAE L 15d

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18427083 PROSTATE CANCER GENE PROFILES AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 86d overdue
17312248 GENOMIC REARRANGEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROSTATE CANCER AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME SISSON, BRADLEY L 42d overdue
17627254 AMPLIFICATION ASSAY FOR THE DETECTION OF ANAPLASMA PHAGOCYTOPHILUM GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 23d overdue
18857032 LAYPERSON AUDIOVISUAL TOURNIQUET POLAND, CHERIE MICHELLE 5d overdue
17909500 DNA DAMAGE REPAIR GENES IN CANCER BAUSCH, SARAE L 15d

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16823
37711
16991

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18857032 LAYPERSON AUDIOVISUAL TOURNIQUET Innovital, LLC POLAND, CHERIE MICHELLE 3771 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Oct 15, 2024
18427083 PROSTATE CANCER GENE PROFILES AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 1682 §103 Final Rejection 86d overdue Pending Jan 30, 2024
17909500 DNA DAMAGE REPAIR GENES IN CANCER The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. BAUSCH, SARAE L 1699 §103 Final Rejection 15d Pending Sep 06, 2022
17627254 AMPLIFICATION ASSAY FOR THE DETECTION OF ANAPLASMA PHAGOCYTOPHILUM The United States Of America AS Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 1682 §103 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Jan 14, 2022
17312248 GENOMIC REARRANGEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROSTATE CANCER AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME Children'S Medical Center Corporation SISSON, BRADLEY L 1682 §103 Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Jun 09, 2021

Managing Mh2 Technology Law Group, LLP (With Hjf)'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month