Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Mmi Intellectual Property

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 6 clients • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MMI Intellectual Property has 8 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials, alongside 224 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 86.81%, and the average is 3.31 office actions per allowance.

These figures provide both current workload and historical prosecution context. The allowance-rate figure addresses resolved outcomes, while the office-action average indicates the amount of recorded examination activity associated with each allowance.

For practitioners, the profile supports a more complete review of chemistry and materials prosecution than a pending-docket figure alone. The combination of active matters, career volume, resolved outcomes, and action frequency can inform diligence about experience and prosecution process demands.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=224 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.8%
Allowance Rate
n=224
+0.53σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=224
3.3
OAs to Allowance
n=125
-0.16σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=125
1028 days
Time to Allowance
n=125
+8.5pp
Interview Lift
n=224
31.9%
RCE Rate
n=224
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=224

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=14 (min 20)
73.9%
§102 Overcome
n=69
75.5%
§103 Overcome
n=98
76.3%
§112 Overcome
n=76

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, B23K, H04W
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=224
1
Practitioners
n=224
224.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=224

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (75%)
2
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only1 (12%)
Double-patenting + other1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (62%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
38% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WARD, THOMAS JOHN 2 52.1% +25.3%
GOLOBOY, JAMES C 1 63.7% +8.7%
SCHIMPF, TARA E 1 78.9% +7.4%
JENNISON, BRIAN W 1 71.9% +22.2%
HE, QIANPING 1 66.2% +15.8%
OLAEGBE, MUDASIRU K 1 72.7% +12.9%
BARTLETT, VICTORIA 1 51.0% +29.5%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17263870 Connecting part for a processing head for thermal material processing, in particular for a plasma torch head, laser head, plasma laser head, and a wearing part, and a wearing-part mount and a method for fitting these together WARD, THOMAS JOHN 70d
18430228 Connecting part for a processing head for thermal material processing WARD, THOMAS JOHN 77d
18872715 Method and plant for recycling carbon-containing composite materials having a carbon-containing matrix material and fibre-, filament- or wire-reinforcement GOLOBOY, JAMES C —
18812865 Paving stone and paving slab as well as paving ceiling or slab covering made from the same SCHIMPF, TARA E —
18684408 Method for Plasma Cutting Workpieces JENNISON, BRIAN W —
18307783 Secure restoration of private key OLAEGBE, MUDASIRU K —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17285873 Method for Predicting a Polymer's Pressure, Flow Rate, and Temperature Relationship While Flowing within an Injection Mold BARTLETT, VICTORIA 74d overdue
17263870 Connecting part for a processing head for thermal material processing, in particular for a plasma torch head, laser head, plasma laser head, and a wearing part, and a wearing-part mount and a method for fitting these together WARD, THOMAS JOHN 70d
18430228 Connecting part for a processing head for thermal material processing WARD, THOMAS JOHN 77d
18684408 Method for Plasma Cutting Workpieces JENNISON, BRIAN W —
18514949 Cartridges for Vertically Oriented Dust Collectors HE, QIANPING —
18307783 Secure restoration of private key OLAEGBE, MUDASIRU K —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37613
17721
36761
17761
24951
17441

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18872715 Method and plant for recycling carbon-containing composite materials having a carbon-containing matrix material and fibre-, filament- or wire-reinforcement Joulmine GmbH & Co. Kg GOLOBOY, JAMES C 1772 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18812865 Paving stone and paving slab as well as paving ceiling or slab covering made from the same Berding Beton GmbH SCHIMPF, TARA E 3676 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 22, 2024
18684408 Method for Plasma Cutting Workpieces Kjellberg-Stiftung JENNISON, BRIAN W 3761 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 16, 2024
18430228 Connecting part for a processing head for thermal material processing Kjellberg-Stiftung WARD, THOMAS JOHN 3761 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 77d Pending Feb 01, 2024
18514949 Cartridges for Vertically Oriented Dust Collectors Imperial Systems, Inc. HE, QIANPING 1776 §102§103DP Final Rejection — Pending Nov 20, 2023
18307783 Secure restoration of private key Die Unternehmensgefährten GmbH OLAEGBE, MUDASIRU K 2495 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 26, 2023
17285873 Method for Predicting a Polymer's Pressure, Flow Rate, and Temperature Relationship While Flowing within an Injection Mold Beaumont Technologies, Inc. BARTLETT, VICTORIA 1744 §103 Final Rejection 74d overdue Pending Apr 15, 2021
17263870 Connecting part for a processing head for thermal material processing, in particular for a plasma torch head, laser head, plasma laser head, and a wearing part, and a wearing-part mount and a method for fitting these together Kjellberg-Stiftung WARD, THOMAS JOHN 3761 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 70d Pending Jan 27, 2021

Managing Mmi Intellectual Property's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mmi Intellectual Property's patent allowance rate?

86.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Mmi Intellectual Property were allowed, across 224 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Mmi Intellectual Property average before allowance?

3.31 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Mmi Intellectual Property have?

8 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 7 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month