Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Moore & Van Allen Pllc For Electrolux

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 2 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC for ELECTROLUX has managed 60 career applications in the Computing & Software technology area. The firm has secured a resolved allowance rate of 93.75 percent, demonstrating its results in obtaining patent grants for this client. This track record highlights the firm's proficiency in navigating the challenges of software-related patent prosecution.

Prosecution efficiency is shown by an average of 2.8 office actions per allowance. Currently, the firm is handling 5 pending office actions, continuing its work on the foundation of its 60 career applications. These 5 active cases provide a current look at how the firm maintains its 93.75 percent allowance rate through ongoing examiner interactions.

The 93.75 percent allowance rate and 2.8 office actions per allowance provide clear performance benchmarks. Practitioners can use these data points to evaluate the firm's effectiveness and speed in navigating the patent office's requirements for Computing & Software innovations. The data indicates a successful prosecution strategy for this specific client and technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=60 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

93.8%
Allowance Rate
n=60
+0.42σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=60
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=30
-0.75σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=30
1111 days
Time to Allowance
n=30
+0.0pp
Interview Lift
n=60
34.4%
RCE Rate
n=60
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=60

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=4 (min 20)
—
§102 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
52.2%
§103 Overcome
n=23
—
§112 Overcome
n=8 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

H04L, B01D, H04W
Top CPC Subclasses
42%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=60
0
Practitioners
n=60
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=60 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
2
Information Tech
40% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALI, WAQAAS A 1 81.1% +17.8%
BARNETT, JOEL 1 80.4% +11.3%
LING, CHHIAN 1 87.2% +25.6%
MUI, WEI YUN 1 57.4% +41.7%
KIM, JONATHAN C 1 73.6% +38.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18838754 HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF BARNETT, JOEL 12d
18579910 A METHOD FOR MANAGING INTERNET CONNECTION OF AN APPLIANCE LING, CHHIAN —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18899978 MECHANICAL INTERLOCK SYSTEM FOR A FILTER ALI, WAQAAS A —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18838754 HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF BARNETT, JOEL 12d
18569715 HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE WITH IMPROVED FIRMWARE UPDATE MUI, WEI YUN 16d
18899978 MECHANICAL INTERLOCK SYSTEM FOR A FILTER ALI, WAQAAS A —
18579910 A METHOD FOR MANAGING INTERNET CONNECTION OF AN APPLIANCE LING, CHHIAN —
18035681 SYSTEM FOR COMPUTING NETWORK-INDEPENDENT APPLIANCE CONTROL USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND USER FEEDBACK KIM, JONATHAN C —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Electrolux 4
Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17771
28491
24461
21911
26551

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18899978 MECHANICAL INTERLOCK SYSTEM FOR A FILTER Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. ALI, WAQAAS A 1777 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 27, 2024
18838754 HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF Electrolux Appliances Aktiebolag BARNETT, JOEL 2849 §103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Aug 15, 2024
18579910 A METHOD FOR MANAGING INTERNET CONNECTION OF AN APPLIANCE Electrolux Appliances Aktiebolag LING, CHHIAN 2446 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 17, 2024
18569715 HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE WITH IMPROVED FIRMWARE UPDATE Electrolux Appliances Aktiebolag MUI, WEI YUN 2191 §103Other Final Rejection 16d Pending Dec 13, 2023
18035681 SYSTEM FOR COMPUTING NETWORK-INDEPENDENT APPLIANCE CONTROL USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND USER FEEDBACK Electrolux Home Products, Inc. KIM, JONATHAN C 2655 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 05, 2023

Managing Moore & Van Allen Pllc For Electrolux's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month