Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 8 clients • 10 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, PLLC has 10 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 501 career applications. The profile shows an active practice with a documented application base in its technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 88.03%, and the average is 2.86 office actions per allowance. Resolved matters show a favorable allowance result, with an average prosecution path involving repeated office-action engagement.

Practitioners can use these figures to consider both likely resolution and response workload. The current docket and application history provide separate views of present activity and accumulated practice experience.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=501 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.0%
Allowance Rate
n=501
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=501
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=331
-0.16σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=331
939 days
Time to Allowance
n=331
+13.7pp
Interview Lift
n=501
15.7%
RCE Rate
n=501
6.0%
Appeal Rate
n=501

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

52.2%
§101 Overcome
n=23
83.8%
§102 Overcome
n=167
81.6%
§103 Overcome
n=266
78.2%
§112 Overcome
n=142

Specialization & Scale

H04R, H02K, G02B
Top CPC Subclasses
18%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=501
7
Practitioners
n=501
71.6
Apps / Practitioner
n=501

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (40%)
5
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (40%)
§102 only1 (10%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
20% of docket
1
Information Tech
10% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
2
Semiconductors
20% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AHMED, ISHFAR 1 — —
AL-TAWEEL, MUAAMAR QAHTAN 1 78.6% +23.2%
ROBINSON, MICHAEL 1 62.1% +20.4%
WILSON, GREGORY A 1 81.9% +6.9%
SHAH, ANTIM G 1 74.3% +38.6%
ABRAHAM, JOSE K 1 83.5% +32.5%
OMAR, AHMED H 1 75.2% +14.2%
ZAWORSKI, JONATHAN R 1 52.4% +26.0%
EFTA, ALEX B 1 59.9% +25.3%
POON, DANA LEE 1 55.4% +41.8%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19203550 BACKING PLATE FOR A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL PLACARD AHMED, ISHFAR —
18935764 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY ROBINSON, MICHAEL —
18726468 Arrangement for Heating a Liquid WILSON, GREGORY A —
18227164 MAGNETIC CORE WITH PROTECTIVE HOUSING ABRAHAM, JOSE K —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17424918 Gel Aerosol-Forming Substrate Cartridge that Can be inserted into Electrically Heated Smoking Article, Electrically Heated Smoking Article Including the Same, and Aerosol Generating Device and System Therefor EFTA, ALEX B 22d
18953236 CONFIGURATION SETTING FOR WIDE AREA SYSTEM PROTECTION AL-TAWEEL, MUAAMAR QAHTAN —
18935764 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY ROBINSON, MICHAEL —
18718671 Sound Amplification Block Made of Air-Permeable Material and Air-Absorbing Material and Having Layered Structure, and Manufacturing Method Thereof SHAH, ANTIM G —
18227164 MAGNETIC CORE WITH PROTECTIVE HOUSING ABRAHAM, JOSE K —
18317301 POWER SUPPLY WITH WATERPROOF COMPONENTS OMAR, AHMED H —
17604586 "manufacturing method of an inductive device" ZAWORSKI, JONATHAN R —
16980958 ROTATIONAL SPEED CONTROL IN ROBOT-SUPPORTED GRINDING POON, DANA LEE —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37232
36311
21131
17441
37621
26931
28371
28591
17451

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19203550 BACKING PLATE FOR A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL PLACARD International Name Plate Supplies Ltd. AHMED, ISHFAR 3631 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2025
18953236 CONFIGURATION SETTING FOR WIDE AREA SYSTEM PROTECTION Quanta Technology, LLC AL-TAWEEL, MUAAMAR QAHTAN 2113 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 20, 2024
18935764 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY Quanta Technology, LLC ROBINSON, MICHAEL 1744 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 04, 2024
18726468 Arrangement for Heating a Liquid Truma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG WILSON, GREGORY A 3762 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2024
18718671 Sound Amplification Block Made of Air-Permeable Material and Air-Absorbing Material and Having Layered Structure, and Manufacturing Method Thereof Em-Tech Co., Ltd. SHAH, ANTIM G 2693 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 11, 2024
18227164 MAGNETIC CORE WITH PROTECTIVE HOUSING Vacuumschmelze GmbH & Co. Kg ABRAHAM, JOSE K 2837 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 27, 2023
18317301 POWER SUPPLY WITH WATERPROOF COMPONENTS Tws Technology (Guangzhou) Limited OMAR, AHMED H 2859 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 15, 2023
17604586 "manufacturing method of an inductive device" Ferrobotics Compliant Robot Technology GmbH ZAWORSKI, JONATHAN R 3723 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 18, 2021
17424918 Gel Aerosol-Forming Substrate Cartridge that Can be inserted into Electrically Heated Smoking Article, Electrically Heated Smoking Article Including the Same, and Aerosol Generating Device and System Therefor Inno-It Co., Ltd. EFTA, ALEX B 1745 §112 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jul 22, 2021
16980958 ROTATIONAL SPEED CONTROL IN ROBOT-SUPPORTED GRINDING Ferrobotics Compliant Robot Technology GmbH POON, DANA LEE 3723 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 15, 2020

Managing Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, Pllc's patent allowance rate?

88.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, Pllc were allowed, across 501 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, Pllc average before allowance?

2.86 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, Pllc have?

10 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 10 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month