Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Computing & Software

10 pending office actions • 7 clients • 10 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, PLLC operates as a patent law firm in Chemistry & Materials. The firm has managed 499 career applications, resulting in a resolved allowance rate of 88.3 percent. Prosecution is efficient, averaging 2.92 office actions per allowance.

Currently, the firm has 6 pending office actions. The 2.92 average office actions per allowance suggests a relatively direct path to grant, with the firm effectively overcoming examiner rejections. This data is based on 499 career applications in the Chemistry & Materials technology area.

An 88.3 percent allowance rate shows a strong track record of securing patent grants. Practitioners can expect a streamlined prosecution process given the 2.92 average office actions per allowance. The 6 pending office actions represent the firm's current active workload in this technical field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=499 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.3%
Allowance Rate
n=499
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=499
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=332
-0.15σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=332
939 days
Time to Allowance
n=332
+13.4pp
Interview Lift
n=499
15.7%
RCE Rate
n=499
6.1%
Appeal Rate
n=499

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

52.2%
§101 Overcome
n=23
83.8%
§102 Overcome
n=167
83.0%
§103 Overcome
n=265
80.1%
§112 Overcome
n=141

Specialization & Scale

H04R, H02K, G02B
Top CPC Subclasses
18%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=499
7
Practitioners
n=499
71.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=499

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (60%)
3
Medium (30%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (10%)
§103 only2 (20%)
§102 only1 (10%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
30% of docket
2
Information Tech
20% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
1
Semiconductors
10% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
10% of docket
2
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AHMED, ISHFAR 1 — —
AL-TAWEEL, MUAAMAR QAHTAN 1 80.6% +19.7%
ROBINSON, MICHAEL 1 62.0% +20.6%
WILSON, GREGORY A 1 81.8% +6.9%
SHAH, ANTIM G 1 74.2% +39.2%
SANA, MOHAMMAD AZAM 1 86.3% +20.8%
ABRAHAM, JOSE K 1 83.2% +32.9%
KUMAR, SRILAKSHMI K 1 49.7% +15.5%
ZAWORSKI, JONATHAN R 1 52.7% +26.7%
EFTA, ALEX B 1 59.8% +25.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18953236 CONFIGURATION SETTING FOR WIDE AREA SYSTEM PROTECTION AL-TAWEEL, MUAAMAR QAHTAN —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18104851 GEL RECEPTOR ROD INSERTABLE INTO ELECTRICALLY HEATED SMOKING ARTICLE, ELECTRICALLY HEATED SMOKING ARTICLE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND AEROSOL GENERATING DEVICE THEREFOR KUMAR, SRILAKSHMI K 5d
19203550 BACKING PLATE FOR A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL PLACARD AHMED, ISHFAR —
18935764 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY ROBINSON, MICHAEL —
18726468 Arrangement for Heating a Liquid WILSON, GREGORY A —
18660410 Unified Data Platform for Protection, Control, and Automation Device Configurations SANA, MOHAMMAD AZAM —
18227164 MAGNETIC CORE WITH PROTECTIVE HOUSING ABRAHAM, JOSE K —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18104851 GEL RECEPTOR ROD INSERTABLE INTO ELECTRICALLY HEATED SMOKING ARTICLE, ELECTRICALLY HEATED SMOKING ARTICLE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND AEROSOL GENERATING DEVICE THEREFOR KUMAR, SRILAKSHMI K 5d
17424918 Gel Aerosol-Forming Substrate Cartridge that Can be inserted into Electrically Heated Smoking Article, Electrically Heated Smoking Article Including the Same, and Aerosol Generating Device and System Therefor EFTA, ALEX B 22d
18953236 CONFIGURATION SETTING FOR WIDE AREA SYSTEM PROTECTION AL-TAWEEL, MUAAMAR QAHTAN —
18935764 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY ROBINSON, MICHAEL —
18718671 Sound Amplification Block Made of Air-Permeable Material and Air-Absorbing Material and Having Layered Structure, and Manufacturing Method Thereof SHAH, ANTIM G —
18660410 Unified Data Platform for Protection, Control, and Automation Device Configurations SANA, MOHAMMAD AZAM —
18227164 MAGNETIC CORE WITH PROTECTIVE HOUSING ABRAHAM, JOSE K —
17604586 "manufacturing method of an inductive device" ZAWORSKI, JONATHAN R —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21131
17441
26931
21161
28371
17001
37231
17451

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19203550 BACKING PLATE FOR A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL PLACARD International Name Plate Supplies Ltd. AHMED, ISHFAR §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2025
18953236 CONFIGURATION SETTING FOR WIDE AREA SYSTEM PROTECTION Quanta Technology, LLC AL-TAWEEL, MUAAMAR QAHTAN 2113 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 20, 2024
18935764 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY Quanta Technology, LLC ROBINSON, MICHAEL 1744 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 04, 2024
18726468 Arrangement for Heating a Liquid Truma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG WILSON, GREGORY A §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2024
18718671 Sound Amplification Block Made of Air-Permeable Material and Air-Absorbing Material and Having Layered Structure, and Manufacturing Method Thereof Em-Tech Co., Ltd. SHAH, ANTIM G 2693 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 11, 2024
18660410 Unified Data Platform for Protection, Control, and Automation Device Configurations Quanta Technology, LLC SANA, MOHAMMAD AZAM 2116 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 10, 2024
18227164 MAGNETIC CORE WITH PROTECTIVE HOUSING Vacuumschmelze GmbH & Co. Kg ABRAHAM, JOSE K 2837 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 27, 2023
18104851 GEL RECEPTOR ROD INSERTABLE INTO ELECTRICALLY HEATED SMOKING ARTICLE, ELECTRICALLY HEATED SMOKING ARTICLE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND AEROSOL GENERATING DEVICE THEREFOR Inno-It Co., Ltd. KUMAR, SRILAKSHMI K 1700 §103§112 Final Rejection 5d Pending Feb 02, 2023
17604586 "manufacturing method of an inductive device" Ferrobotics Compliant Robot Technology GmbH ZAWORSKI, JONATHAN R 3723 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 18, 2021
17424918 Gel Aerosol-Forming Substrate Cartridge that Can be inserted into Electrically Heated Smoking Article, Electrically Heated Smoking Article Including the Same, and Aerosol Generating Device and System Therefor Inno-It Co., Ltd. EFTA, ALEX B 1745 §112 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jul 22, 2021

Managing Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month