Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Nath, Goldberg & Meyer

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

13 pending office actions • 5 clients • 13 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 127 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

NATH, GOLDBERG & MEYER has 14 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 7437 career applications. The profile reflects a substantial application history with continuing activity in device and engineering prosecution.

The resolved allowance rate is 77.67%, and the average is 1.93 office actions per allowance. The reported outcome provides a resolution measure, while the action average indicates a relatively direct path to allowance within the stated record.

Practitioners should consider these measures together, since outcome and examination effort address different planning questions. The pending docket indicates current work, and the career application count supplies context for the historical metrics.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=7437 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

77.7%
Allowance Rate
n=7437
+0.61σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=7437
1.9
OAs to Allowance
n=4953
-0.81σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=4953
560 days
Time to Allowance
n=4953
+14.5pp
Interview Lift
n=7437
9.4%
RCE Rate
n=7437
2.7%
Appeal Rate
n=7437

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

81.8%
§101 Overcome
n=297
77.5%
§102 Overcome
n=1081
77.8%
§103 Overcome
n=2252
82.4%
§112 Overcome
n=1502

Specialization & Scale

A61P, C07D, A61K
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=7437
7
Practitioners
n=7437
1062.4
Apps / Practitioner
n=7437

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (46%)
7
Medium (54%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§103 only6 (46%)
Double-patenting + other1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
38% of docket
1
Information Tech
8% of docket
1
Communications
8% of docket
1
Semiconductors
8% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
38% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHAN, CANDICE 1 72.5% +19.5%
MENDEZ, ZULMARIAM 1 66.1% +21.3%
BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY 1 78.6% +34.6%
PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 1 47.5% +41.3%
STARKS, WILBERT L 1 74.7% +3.3%
QIAN, SHIZHI 1 62.0% +46.2%
MORAN, EDWARD JOHN 1 42.0% +61.2%
LANE, DANIEL E 1 3.8% +8.3%
BYRD, BRIGID K 1 71.4% +46.4%
RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW 1 73.4% +33.8%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18732306 ULTRASENSITIVE AND SELECTIVE SENSORS FOR GLUCOSE DETECTION BASED ON THIOL-FUNCTIONALIZED HETEROGENOUS GOLD/GRAPHENE/COPPER FILM QIAN, SHIZHI 28d
17536370 VENTILATOR AND INFLATION BAG OPERATION OF VENTILATOR RHEE, KELSEY 62d
19350268 PEROVSKITE-BASED WHITE OR MULTI-WAVELENGTH LASER CHAN, CANDICE —
19074171 METHOD OF ANALYZING DERMOSCOPY IMAGES BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY —
19041058 Accelerating Inductive Learning In Description Logic STARKS, WILBERT L —
18414304 MOTION SENSITIVE LED GLASSES LANE, DANIEL E —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18482606 DOUBLE-HEADED SURGICAL INSTRUMENT BYRD, BRIGID K 147d overdue
18669848 DENTAL POST KIT AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME MORAN, EDWARD JOHN 28d overdue
18732306 ULTRASENSITIVE AND SELECTIVE SENSORS FOR GLUCOSE DETECTION BASED ON THIOL-FUNCTIONALIZED HETEROGENOUS GOLD/GRAPHENE/COPPER FILM QIAN, SHIZHI 28d
19350268 PEROVSKITE-BASED WHITE OR MULTI-WAVELENGTH LASER CHAN, CANDICE —
19271977 TIO2 PHOTOANODES DOPED WITH Zr-Fe2O3 MENDEZ, ZULMARIAM —
19074171 METHOD OF ANALYZING DERMOSCOPY IMAGES BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY —
19070784 METHOD OF SYNTHESIZING COPPER FERRITE NANOPARTICLES USING METAL CANS PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY —
18204557 SAFETY NEEDLE FOR ADMINISTERING MEDICATION AND WITHDRAWING BIOLOGICAL FLUIDS RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28131
17941
26731
17381
21221
17951
37721
37151
37711
37831

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19350268 PEROVSKITE-BASED WHITE OR MULTI-WAVELENGTH LASER King Saud University CHAN, CANDICE 2813 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 06, 2025
19271977 TIO2 PHOTOANODES DOPED WITH Zr-Fe2O3 King Saud University MENDEZ, ZULMARIAM 1794 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 17, 2025
19074171 METHOD OF ANALYZING DERMOSCOPY IMAGES Sklip Inc. BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY 2673 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2025
19070784 METHOD OF SYNTHESIZING COPPER FERRITE NANOPARTICLES USING METAL CANS King Saud University PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 1738 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 05, 2025
19041058 Accelerating Inductive Learning In Description Logic King Saud University STARKS, WILBERT L 2122 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 30, 2025
18732306 ULTRASENSITIVE AND SELECTIVE SENSORS FOR GLUCOSE DETECTION BASED ON THIOL-FUNCTIONALIZED HETEROGENOUS GOLD/GRAPHENE/COPPER FILM King Faisal University QIAN, SHIZHI 1795 §103§112 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Jun 03, 2024
18669848 DENTAL POST KIT AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME King Saud University MORAN, EDWARD JOHN 3772 §103 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending May 21, 2024
18414304 MOTION SENSITIVE LED GLASSES King Faisal University LANE, DANIEL E 3715 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 16, 2024
18482606 DOUBLE-HEADED SURGICAL INSTRUMENT King Faisal University BYRD, BRIGID K 3771 §103 Non-Final OA 147d overdue Pending Oct 06, 2023
18204557 SAFETY NEEDLE FOR ADMINISTERING MEDICATION AND WITHDRAWING BIOLOGICAL FLUIDS King Saud University RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW 3783 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 01, 2023
17859609 EXTRACTION OF SHIKONIN FROM ARNEBIA DECUMBENS ROOTS AND USE OF SHIKONIN DERIVATIVES FOR TREATING ULCERS Kuwait University HUTTER, GILLIAN A 1625 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 07, 2022
17536370 VENTILATOR AND INFLATION BAG OPERATION OF VENTILATOR Kuwait University RHEE, KELSEY 3785 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 62d Pending Nov 29, 2021
14437902 METHOD FOR PREPARATION OF A HIGH CONCENTRATION LIQUID FORMULATION OF AN ANTIBODY Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited JUEDES, AMY E 1644 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Apr 23, 2015

Managing Nath, Goldberg & Meyer's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nath, Goldberg & Meyer's patent allowance rate?

77.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Nath, Goldberg & Meyer were allowed, across 7,437 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Nath, Goldberg & Meyer average before allowance?

1.93 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Nath, Goldberg & Meyer have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 13 examiners in 13 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month