Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

New River Valley Intellectual

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

12 pending office actions • 7 clients • 10 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

NEW RIVER VALLEY INTELLECTUAL operates in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The firm has managed 406 career applications and currently oversees 11 pending office actions. These figures indicate the firm's historical experience and its current level of engagement with the USPTO. This data provides a baseline for understanding the firm's presence in this sector.

The firm's resolved allowance rate is 66.28. On average, the firm receives 4.19 office actions per allowance. Practitioners can use this average to estimate the frequency of examiner interactions required to reach a grant for applications in this portfolio. These metrics offer an overview of the firm's prosecution results.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=406 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

66.3%
Allowance Rate
n=406
+0.40σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=406
4.2
OAs to Allowance
n=114
+0.16σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=114
1128 days
Time to Allowance
n=114
+13.8pp
Interview Lift
n=406
28.5%
RCE Rate
n=406
0.7%
Appeal Rate
n=406

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

66.7%
§101 Overcome
n=24
59.6%
§102 Overcome
n=94
62.5%
§103 Overcome
n=144
61.6%
§112 Overcome
n=112

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61B, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
26%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=406
0
Practitioners
n=406
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=406 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (58%)
2
Medium (17%)
3
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (17%)
§112 only2 (17%)
Double-patenting only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (58%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
2
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PETTITT, JOHN F 2 26.0% +21.8%
BARSKY, JARED 2 50.2% +22.7%
CLARK, RYAN T 1 50.4% +18.2%
ZHANG, YINGCHUAN 1 68.7% +28.6%
WILSON, MICHAEL C 1 41.5% +17.9%
LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON 1 82.1% +24.2%
TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 1 65.6% +27.7%
PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F 1 77.8% +13.0%
KING, BRIAN M 1 70.1% +23.8%
COOK, LISA V 1 67.6% +9.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18404473 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME MONITORING OF ELECTROPHYSICAL EFFECTS DURING TISSUE TREATMENT LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18398897 SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR NATURAL GAS LIQUEFACTION PETTITT, JOHN F 8d overdue
18356991 Drainage System TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 8d overdue
18315233 LNG Liquefaction System and Process KING, BRIAN M 41d
18890466 MOVING TARGETS ROUTE SIMULATOR QUARTERBACK GAME ZHANG, YINGCHUAN —
18792154 LNG LIQUEFACTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS PETTITT, JOHN F —
18680548 FEL D 1 KNOCKOUTS AND ASSOCIATED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS BASED ON CRISPR-CAS9 GENOMIC EDITING WILSON, MICHAEL C —
18348605 IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC METHODS USING ELECTROPORATION PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18126561 METHODS OF ADMINISTERING SOTALOL HYDROCHLORIDE BARSKY, JARED 125d overdue
18417748 METHOD OF INITIATING AND ESCALATING SOTALOL HYDROCHLORIDE DOSING BARSKY, JARED 121d overdue
18398897 SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR NATURAL GAS LIQUEFACTION PETTITT, JOHN F 8d overdue
18356991 Drainage System TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 8d overdue
18315233 LNG Liquefaction System and Process KING, BRIAN M 41d
18930252 METHODS OF REDUCING ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NON-THERMAL ABLATION CLARK, RYAN T —
18890466 MOVING TARGETS ROUTE SIMULATOR QUARTERBACK GAME ZHANG, YINGCHUAN —
18792154 LNG LIQUEFACTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS PETTITT, JOHN F —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37633
16282
16381
37911
37621
37941
16421

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18930252 METHODS OF REDUCING ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NON-THERMAL ABLATION VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC. CLARK, RYAN T DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 29, 2024
18890466 MOVING TARGETS ROUTE SIMULATOR QUARTERBACK GAME Mao, Shiwei ZHANG, YINGCHUAN §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 19, 2024
18792154 LNG LIQUEFACTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS NuBlu Innovations, LLC PETTITT, JOHN F 3763 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 01, 2024
18680548 FEL D 1 KNOCKOUTS AND ASSOCIATED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS BASED ON CRISPR-CAS9 GENOMIC EDITING Indoor Biotechnologies Inc. WILSON, MICHAEL C 1638 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 31, 2024
18417748 METHOD OF INITIATING AND ESCALATING SOTALOL HYDROCHLORIDE DOSING AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC BARSKY, JARED 1628 §103 Final Rejection 121d overdue Pending Jan 19, 2024
18404473 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME MONITORING OF ELECTROPHYSICAL EFFECTS DURING TISSUE TREATMENT VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC. LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON 3791 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 04, 2024
18398897 SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR NATURAL GAS LIQUEFACTION NuBlu Innovations, LLC PETTITT, JOHN F 3763 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Dec 28, 2023
18356991 Drainage System NuBlu Innovations, LLC TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 3762 §103§112 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Jul 21, 2023
18348605 IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC METHODS USING ELECTROPORATION VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC. PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F 3794 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 07, 2023
18315233 LNG Liquefaction System and Process High Roller E & C, LLC KING, BRIAN M 3763 §103§112 Final Rejection 41d Pending May 10, 2023
18126561 METHODS OF ADMINISTERING SOTALOL HYDROCHLORIDE AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC BARSKY, JARED 1628 §103 Final Rejection 125d overdue Pending Mar 27, 2023
17787773 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR OOCYTE-SPECIFIC CONTRACEPTION David Kroeger COOK, LISA V 1642 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2022

Managing New River Valley Intellectual's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month