Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
7 pending office actions • 4 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
QUINTERO LAW OFFICE, PC handles Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics matters and has 6 pending office actions. Its reported portfolio includes 3305 career applications, an 81.17% resolved allowance rate, and an average of 2.83 office actions per allowance.
The allowance rate indicates that resolved applications reached allowance in a majority of reported cases. The office-action average shows that allowed matters commonly required more than one examination response, making prosecution persistence relevant to the historical record.
The pending docket is small relative to the career application volume, so it provides a current-workload signal rather than a complete measure of practice activity. Semiconductor practitioners can use the metrics to frame expectations around amendment cycles and allowance prospects, while relying on the file history for matter-specific decisions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (29%) |
| §102 only | 1 (14%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (43%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (14%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONLEY, FREDRICK C | 2 | 70.6% | +12.8% |
| ISAAC, STANETTA D | 1 | 85.8% | -36.0% |
| WU, JERRY | 1 | 68.8% | +20.4% |
| IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA | 1 | 81.8% | +22.2% |
| ALSOMIRI, ISAM A | 1 | 66.8% | +23.2% |
| EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | 1 | 16.4% | +36.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18193012 | BACK SIDE METALLIZATION THIN FILM STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME | ISAAC, STANETTA D | — |
| 17970487 | MICRO LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE PACKAGE STRUCTURE | IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18069167 | CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF | WU, JERRY | 132d overdue |
| 18647639 | INFLATABLE PRODUCT | CONLEY, FREDRICK C | 34d |
| 18458974 | Inflatable Product | CONLEY, FREDRICK C | 34d |
| 17846957 | METHOD AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING DECISION TREE FOR DISEASE PREDICTION | EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | 65d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18069167 | CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF | WU, JERRY | 132d overdue |
| 18647639 | INFLATABLE PRODUCT | CONLEY, FREDRICK C | 34d |
| 18458974 | Inflatable Product | CONLEY, FREDRICK C | 34d |
| 17846957 | METHOD AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING DECISION TREE FOR DISEASE PREDICTION | EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | 65d |
| 17970487 | MICRO LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE PACKAGE STRUCTURE | IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA | — |
| 17868689 | OPTICAL ACTIVITY DETECTING DEVICE | ALSOMIRI, ISAM A | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Team Worldwide Corporation | 2 |
| WISTRON CORPORATION | 2 |
| Lextar Electronics | 2 |
| AG MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3679 | 2 |
| 2898 | 1 |
| 2841 | 1 |
| 2817 | 1 |
| 3600 | 1 |
| 3687 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18647639 | INFLATABLE PRODUCT | Team Worldwide Corporation | CONLEY, FREDRICK C | 3679 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Apr 26, 2024 |
| 18458974 | Inflatable Product | Team Worldwide Corporation | CONLEY, FREDRICK C | 3679 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Aug 30, 2023 |
| 18193012 | BACK SIDE METALLIZATION THIN FILM STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME | AG Materials Technology Co., Ltd. | ISAAC, STANETTA D | 2898 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 30, 2023 |
| 18069167 | CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF | Wistron Corporation | WU, JERRY | 2841 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 132d overdue | Pending | Dec 20, 2022 |
| 17970487 | MICRO LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE PACKAGE STRUCTURE | Lextar Electronics Corporation | IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA | 2817 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 20, 2022 |
| 17868689 | OPTICAL ACTIVITY DETECTING DEVICE | Lextar Electronics Corporation | ALSOMIRI, ISAM A | 3600 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 19, 2022 |
| 17846957 | METHOD AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING DECISION TREE FOR DISEASE PREDICTION | Wistron Corporation | EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | 3687 | — | Final Rejection | 65d | Pending | Jun 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial81.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Quintero Law Office, Pc were allowed, across 3,305 applications in USPTO records.
2.83 office actions per allowed application on average.
7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.
