Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Reches Patents

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

20 pending office actions • 8 clients • 20 examiners • 15 art units • 0 of 20 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 54 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

RECHES PATENTS focuses on Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics and has 21 pending office actions. Its record includes 1833 career applications, an 88.22% resolved allowance rate, and an average of 3.14 office actions per allowance.

The allowance rate indicates that most resolved applications reached allowance. The office-action average shows that allowed matters commonly required several examination responses, making prosecution persistence an important part of the historical record.

The pending docket is active within a substantial application portfolio. For semiconductor and optical practitioners, the figures support planning around both favorable historical outcomes and recurring examination effort, but they do not disclose the technical mix or status of the individual pending applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1833 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.2%
Allowance Rate
n=1833
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1833
3.1
OAs to Allowance
n=1004
-0.14σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1004
1031 days
Time to Allowance
n=1004
+11.0pp
Interview Lift
n=1833
21.9%
RCE Rate
n=1833
8.3%
Appeal Rate
n=1833

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

80.7%
§101 Overcome
n=192
82.8%
§102 Overcome
n=437
83.4%
§103 Overcome
n=745
83.6%
§112 Overcome
n=531

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G01N, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
22%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1833
1
Practitioners
n=1833
1833.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1833

Portfolio Summary

20
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

11
Hard (55%)
7
Medium (35%)
2
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (10%)
§101 + other2 (10%)
§103 only7 (35%)
§112 only2 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (35%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
5% of docket
1
Information Tech
5% of docket
1
Communications
5% of docket
7
Semiconductors
35% of docket
10
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

200 h
Manual time on pending OAs
40 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
70 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RUBY, TRAVIS C 1 54.0% +27.2%
FERENCE, JAMES M 1 71.2% +16.8%
PHILLIPS, RUFUS L 1 62.7% +32.5%
GRAY, SUNGHEE Y 1 82.9% +11.4%
DOWNING, SAVANNAH STARR 1 78.3% +8.0%
EIDE, ERIC T 1 67.0% +21.9%
RODGERS, THOMAS RAYMOND 1 58.7% +59.3%
MULLER, BRYAN R 1 43.7% +31.0%
SHEWAREGED, BETELHEM 1 71.6% +9.2%
SKUBINNA, CHRISTINE J 1 61.9% +20.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18879240 EVALUATION OF ABNORMALITIES OF A SAMPLE GRAY, SUNGHEE Y —

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18701604 Crossing gaps between panels table for Robotic cleaning solution on PV panels. MULLER, BRYAN R 121d overdue
18550126 POOL CLEANING SYSTEM HAVING A FLOATING UNIT KARLS, SHAY LYNN 46d overdue
18566919 METROLOGY TECHNIQUE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES MENDOZA, ALEXANDRIA ARELLANO 22d
17936378 Automatic classification of healthy and disease conditions from images or digital standard 12-lead ECGs EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT 26d
19137274 ENHANCEMENT OF THE THERMOACOUSTIC EFFECT RUBY, TRAVIS C —
18880253 STRUCTURAL BLOCK WALL SYSTEM AND METHOD FERENCE, JAMES M —
18879248 OPTICAL CRITICAL DIMENSIONS (OCD) METROLOGY FOR THICK STACKS PHILLIPS, RUFUS L —
18557588 ESTIMATING PARAMETERS OF A MODEL THAT IS NON-LINEAR AND IS MORE COMPLEX THAN A LOG-LINEAR MODEL ANDERSON, SCOTT C —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18701604 Crossing gaps between panels table for Robotic cleaning solution on PV panels. MULLER, BRYAN R 121d overdue
18681857 ELECTROMAGNETIC POOL RELATED PLATFORM BATTERY CHARGING SKUBINNA, CHRISTINE J 46d
19137274 ENHANCEMENT OF THE THERMOACOUSTIC EFFECT RUBY, TRAVIS C —
18880253 STRUCTURAL BLOCK WALL SYSTEM AND METHOD FERENCE, JAMES M —
18879248 OPTICAL CRITICAL DIMENSIONS (OCD) METROLOGY FOR THICK STACKS PHILLIPS, RUFUS L —
18879240 EVALUATION OF ABNORMALITIES OF A SAMPLE GRAY, SUNGHEE Y —
18860678 ELECTCRO-OPTIC MODULATOR AND A METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE ELECTRO-OPTIC MODULATOR EIDE, ERIC T —
18665500 FLUID JET CONTROL UNIT OF A POOL RELATED PLATFORM RODGERS, THOMAS RAYMOND —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28773
37233
28842
37631
36351
28751
17851
37541
36941
26721

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19137274 ENHANCEMENT OF THE THERMOACOUSTIC EFFECT Technion Research & Development Foundation Limited RUBY, TRAVIS C 3763 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 09, 2025
18880253 STRUCTURAL BLOCK WALL SYSTEM AND METHOD Hempblock International Pty Ltd. FERENCE, JAMES M 3635 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
18879248 OPTICAL CRITICAL DIMENSIONS (OCD) METROLOGY FOR THICK STACKS Nova Ltd. PHILLIPS, RUFUS L 2877 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 27, 2024
18879240 EVALUATION OF ABNORMALITIES OF A SAMPLE Nova Ltd. GRAY, SUNGHEE Y 2877 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 26, 2024
18961365 HIGH BRIGHTNESS x-ray SOURCE Nova Measuring Instruments Inc. DOWNING, SAVANNAH STARR 2884 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18860678 ELECTCRO-OPTIC MODULATOR AND A METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE ELECTRO-OPTIC MODULATOR Dustphotonics EIDE, ERIC T 2875 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 27, 2024
18665500 FLUID JET CONTROL UNIT OF A POOL RELATED PLATFORM Maytronics Ltd. RODGERS, THOMAS RAYMOND 3723 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 15, 2024
18701604 Crossing gaps between panels table for Robotic cleaning solution on PV panels. Airtouch Solar Ltd. MULLER, BRYAN R 3723 §103§112 Non-Final OA 121d overdue Pending Apr 15, 2024
18441994 LITHIUM-ION CELL HAVING RIGID STRUCTURE WITH PRESSURE Storedot Ltd. SHEWAREGED, BETELHEM 1785 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2024
18681857 ELECTROMAGNETIC POOL RELATED PLATFORM BATTERY CHARGING Maytronics Ltd. SKUBINNA, CHRISTINE J 3754 §103 Non-Final OA 46d Pending Feb 06, 2024
18566919 METROLOGY TECHNIQUE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES Nova Ltd. MENDOZA, ALEXANDRIA ARELLANO 2877 §103§112 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Dec 04, 2023
18557588 ESTIMATING PARAMETERS OF A MODEL THAT IS NON-LINEAR AND IS MORE COMPLEX THAN A LOG-LINEAR MODEL Technion Research & Development Foundation Limited ANDERSON, SCOTT C 3694 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 27, 2023
18551856 PALM TREE MAPPING B. G. Negev Technologies and Applications Ltd. ZHANG, WAYNE 2672 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 21, 2023
18550126 POOL CLEANING SYSTEM HAVING A FLOATING UNIT Maytronics Ltd. KARLS, SHAY LYNN 3723 §102§103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Sep 11, 2023
18453266 FEED-FORWARD OF MULTI-LAYER AND MULTI-PROCESS INFORMATION USING XPS AND XRF TECHNOLOGIES Nova Measuring Instruments Inc. YUN, JURIE 2884 §112 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Aug 21, 2023
18364461 MALICIOUS SOURCE CODE DETECTION B. G. Negev Technologies and Applications Ltd. VAUGHAN, MICHAEL R 2431 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 02, 2023
18360635 NAVIGATING A POOL RELATED PLATFORM Maytronics Ltd. GENTILE, ALEXANDER VINCENT 3664 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 27, 2023
18260036 EVALUATING X-RAY SIGNALS FROM A PERTURBED OBJECT Nova Ltd. SINGLETARY, MICHAEL J 2857 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 30, 2023
17918893 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR GENERATING IMAGE AND DISTANCE INFORMATION Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd. RODRIGUEZ, VICENTE M 3642 §103 Non-Final OA 16d overdue Pending Oct 13, 2022
17936378 Automatic classification of healthy and disease conditions from images or digital standard 12-lead ECGs Technion Research And Development Foundation Ltd. EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT 3792 §101 Final Rejection 26d Pending Sep 28, 2022

Managing Reches Patents's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Reches Patents's patent allowance rate?

88.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Reches Patents were allowed, across 1,833 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Reches Patents average before allowance?

3.14 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Reches Patents have?

20 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 20 examiners in 15 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month