Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Rowantree Law Group, Pllc

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

14 pending office actions • 9 clients • 11 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 14 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

RowanTree Law Group, PLLC focuses on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. Its profile records 420 career applications and 14 pending office actions, indicating a current docket alongside a defined application history.

The resolved allowance rate is 88.26%, and the average is 2.86 office actions per allowance. Together, these figures show the firm’s allowance outcomes and the prosecution activity associated with reaching them. Prospective clients can consider the pending workload and the technology focus when evaluating whether the firm’s experience matches the needs of a transportation, e-commerce, or mechanical application.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=420 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.3%
Allowance Rate
n=420
+0.84σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=420
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=233
-0.39σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=233
930 days
Time to Allowance
n=233
+5.2pp
Interview Lift
n=420
20.8%
RCE Rate
n=420
3.8%
Appeal Rate
n=420

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

75.9%
§101 Overcome
n=58
80.4%
§102 Overcome
n=102
78.2%
§103 Overcome
n=174
83.9%
§112 Overcome
n=87

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G07F, Y02E
Top CPC Subclasses
24%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=420
3
Practitioners
n=420
140.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=420

Portfolio Summary

14
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
3
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (43%)
5
Medium (36%)
3
Easy (21%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (14%)
§103 only5 (36%)
§112 only1 (7%)
Double-patenting only2 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
21% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
79% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

140 h
Manual time on pending OAs
28 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
49 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BORISSOV, IGOR N 4 28.5% +41.7%
BROWN, DREW J 1 89.5% +5.9%
DURAN, ARTHUR D 1 16.2% +24.3%
PENG, BO JOSEPH 1 69.5% +13.6%
LAGUARDA, GONZALO 1 73.0% +7.2%
KC, SAGAR 1 86.8% +5.2%
BROWN, SARA GRACE 1 28.8% +32.3%
ZAAB, SHARAH 1 70.5% +26.4%
ABEL, GARY ROBERT 1 87.9% +10.8%
HOANG, TUAN A 1 74.5% +11.3%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19255821 ELECTRIC VEHICLE WITH SELECTIVE DYNAMIC LEAN MODES BROWN, DREW J —
18970466 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REMOTE ROBOTIC CONTROL OF POSITIONING OF AN INSTRUMENT KC, SAGAR —

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19021069 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHARGING ELECTRIC VEHICLES BORISSOV, IGOR N 93d overdue
19021067 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE (GUI)-BASED CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES BORISSOV, IGOR N 93d overdue
19021077 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHARGING ELECTRIC VEHICLES UTILIZING A TOUCH-SENSITIVE INTERFACE BORISSOV, IGOR N 91d overdue
18837303 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OMNICHANNEL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT BROWN, SARA GRACE 43d overdue
19247991 DATA AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR PBM AND HEALTHCARE NETWORKS DURAN, ARTHUR D —
19037088 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING MISALIGNMENT IN BATTERY CELLS USING ULTRASOUND LAGUARDA, GONZALO —
19021073 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING AND POWER MANAGEMENT BORISSOV, IGOR N —
18729973 SOLDER AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE ABEL, GARY ROBERT —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19021069 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHARGING ELECTRIC VEHICLES BORISSOV, IGOR N 93d overdue
19021067 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE (GUI)-BASED CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES BORISSOV, IGOR N 93d overdue
19021077 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHARGING ELECTRIC VEHICLES UTILIZING A TOUCH-SENSITIVE INTERFACE BORISSOV, IGOR N 91d overdue
18837303 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OMNICHANNEL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT BROWN, SARA GRACE 43d overdue
19247991 DATA AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR PBM AND HEALTHCARE NETWORKS DURAN, ARTHUR D —
19192622 PREOPERATIVE IMAGING COMBINED WITH INTRAOPERATIVE NAVIGATION BEFORE AND AFTER ALTERATION OF A SURGICAL SITE TO CREATE A COMPOSITE SURGICAL THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURAL DATASET PENG, BO JOSEPH —
19021073 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING AND POWER MANAGEMENT BORISSOV, IGOR N —
18791716 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR FAILURE DETECTION OF ONE OR MORE ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES ZAAB, SHARAH —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36854
36171
36831
37971
37471
36571
36251
28571
28971
28981

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19255821 ELECTRIC VEHICLE WITH SELECTIVE DYNAMIC LEAN MODES The Barbara B. Buzard Descendants' Trust BROWN, DREW J 3617 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 30, 2025
19247991 DATA AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR PBM AND HEALTHCARE NETWORKS Flipt, LLC DURAN, ARTHUR D 3683 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 24, 2025
19192622 PREOPERATIVE IMAGING COMBINED WITH INTRAOPERATIVE NAVIGATION BEFORE AND AFTER ALTERATION OF A SURGICAL SITE TO CREATE A COMPOSITE SURGICAL THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURAL DATASET Jpi Consulting PENG, BO JOSEPH 3797 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2025
19037088 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING MISALIGNMENT IN BATTERY CELLS USING ULTRASOUND Titan Advanced Energy Solutions, Inc. LAGUARDA, GONZALO 3747 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 25, 2025
19021073 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING AND POWER MANAGEMENT Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC BORISSOV, IGOR N 3685 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 14, 2025
19021069 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHARGING ELECTRIC VEHICLES Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC BORISSOV, IGOR N 3685 §103 Non-Final OA 93d overdue Pending Jan 14, 2025
19021077 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHARGING ELECTRIC VEHICLES UTILIZING A TOUCH-SENSITIVE INTERFACE Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC BORISSOV, IGOR N 3685 §103§112 Final Rejection 91d overdue Pending Jan 14, 2025
19021067 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE (GUI)-BASED CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC BORISSOV, IGOR N 3685 §103 Non-Final OA 93d overdue Pending Jan 14, 2025
18970466 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REMOTE ROBOTIC CONTROL OF POSITIONING OF AN INSTRUMENT Jpi Consulting KC, SAGAR 3657 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18837303 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OMNICHANNEL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT Fresh Technology, Inc. BROWN, SARA GRACE 3625 §101§103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Aug 09, 2024
18791716 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR FAILURE DETECTION OF ONE OR MORE ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES Titan Advanced Energy Solutions, Inc. ZAAB, SHARAH 2857 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 01, 2024
18729973 SOLDER AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE Minebea Power Semiconductor Device Inc. ABEL, GARY ROBERT 2897 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2024
18705708 SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE Aoi Electronics Co., Ltd. HOANG, TUAN A 2898 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2024
18143762 MILK TEXTURING AND DISPENSING ASSEMBLY Felicity Bolwell AS Trustee For The Bolwell Family Trust CHEN, SIMPSON ABRAHAM 3761 §112 Non-Final OA 83d Pending May 05, 2023

Managing Rowantree Law Group, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rowantree Law Group, Pllc's patent allowance rate?

88.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Rowantree Law Group, Pllc were allowed, across 420 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Rowantree Law Group, Pllc average before allowance?

2.86 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Rowantree Law Group, Pllc have?

14 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 9 clients, before 11 examiners in 11 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month