Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Sandbright, Pllc

5 pending office actions • 2 clients • 5 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=61 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

75.8%
Allowance Rate
n=61
+0.33σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=61
3.3
OAs to Allowance
n=25
-0.19σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=25
980 days
Time to Allowance
n=25
+11.9pp
Interview Lift
n=61
21.2%
RCE Rate
n=61
6.8%
Appeal Rate
n=61

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
51.7%
§102 Overcome
n=29
54.3%
§103 Overcome
n=35
39.1%
§112 Overcome
n=23

Specialization & Scale

A61B, A61M, F03D
Top CPC Subclasses
29%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=61
0
Practitioners
n=61
Apps / Practitioner
n=61 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (80%)
1
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (80%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
20% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
2
Business / Other
40% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LIN, ERICA S Y 1 85.9% +2.6%
TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 1 69.9% +32.4%
CAMPOS JR, JUAN J 1 68.7% +19.8%
SCOTT, RANDY A 1 84.6% -1.6%
MCGRATH, ERIN E 1 60.0% +29.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18372430 OFFSHORE EQUIPMENT DESTRUCTION APPARATUS AND METHOD SCOTT, RANDY A 3d overdue

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18091746 SYSTEM FOR USE IN THE APPLICATION AND REMOVAL OF TATTOOS AND OTHER SKIN TREATMENTS MCGRATH, ERIN E 12d
18731630 INTERNAL PLATFORM SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR AN OFFSHORE FOUNDATION STRUCTURE TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 29d
18729984 WIND TURBINE CABLE CONNECTOR MONITORING METHOD AND DEVICE LIN, ERICA S Y
18291473 WIND TURBINE BLADE INSTALLATION APPARATUS AND METHOD OF INSTALLING A WIND TURBINE BLADE CAMPOS JR, JUAN J

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18091746 SYSTEM FOR USE IN THE APPLICATION AND REMOVAL OF TATTOOS AND OTHER SKIN TREATMENTS MCGRATH, ERIN E 12d
18731630 INTERNAL PLATFORM SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR AN OFFSHORE FOUNDATION STRUCTURE TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 29d
18291473 WIND TURBINE BLADE INSTALLATION APPARATUS AND METHOD OF INSTALLING A WIND TURBINE BLADE CAMPOS JR, JUAN J

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
ØRSTED WIND POWER A/S 4
Rejuvatek Medical Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36781
24391
37711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18729984 WIND TURBINE CABLE CONNECTOR MONITORING METHOD AND DEVICE ØRSTED WIND POWER A/S LIN, ERICA S Y §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 18, 2024
18731630 INTERNAL PLATFORM SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR AN OFFSHORE FOUNDATION STRUCTURE ØRSTED WIND POWER A/S TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 3678 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Jun 03, 2024
18291473 WIND TURBINE BLADE INSTALLATION APPARATUS AND METHOD OF INSTALLING A WIND TURBINE BLADE ØRSTED WIND POWER A/S CAMPOS JR, JUAN J §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 23, 2024
18372430 OFFSHORE EQUIPMENT DESTRUCTION APPARATUS AND METHOD ØRSTED WIND POWER A/S SCOTT, RANDY A 2439 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Sep 25, 2023
18091746 SYSTEM FOR USE IN THE APPLICATION AND REMOVAL OF TATTOOS AND OTHER SKIN TREATMENTS Rejuvatek Medical Inc. MCGRATH, ERIN E 3771 §103§112 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Dec 30, 2022

Managing Sandbright, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month