Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Sandbright, Pllc

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 2 clients • 6 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SANDBRIGHT, PLLC is a boutique firm with 58 career applications in the Networking & Security technology area. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 77.14 percent. Prosecution typically requires 3.04 office actions per allowance, which is indicative of the complexities involved in securing networking and security patents. This average suggests a thorough examination process requiring multiple responses to the USPTO.

The firm currently has 3 pending office actions. This small number of active cases is consistent with its total of 58 career applications. The 77.14 percent allowance rate shows a respectable success rate for a specialized firm. The 3.04 office actions per allowance suggests that clients should expect a detailed prosecution cycle to achieve an allowance in this technical field. This data reflects a firm that provides focused attention on a small number of specialized applications, maintaining a consistent success rate in a challenging sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=58 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

77.1%
Allowance Rate
n=58
+0.36σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=58
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=27
-0.29σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=27
1047 days
Time to Allowance
n=27
+6.8pp
Interview Lift
n=58
20.0%
RCE Rate
n=58
7.5%
Appeal Rate
n=58

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=4 (min 20)
55.6%
§102 Overcome
n=27
57.6%
§103 Overcome
n=33
42.9%
§112 Overcome
n=21

Specialization & Scale

A61B, A61M, F03D
Top CPC Subclasses
26%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=58
0
Practitioners
n=58
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=58 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (83%)
1
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (83%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
2
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LIN, ERICA S Y 1 85.9% +2.7%
TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 1 70.1% +32.2%
CAMPOS JR, JUAN J 1 68.9% +19.5%
SCOTT, RANDY A 1 84.7% -1.4%
BYRD, BRIGID K 1 71.4% +46.4%
MCGRATH, ERIN E 1 60.1% +28.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18372430 OFFSHORE EQUIPMENT DESTRUCTION APPARATUS AND METHOD SCOTT, RANDY A 3d overdue

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18091797 SYSTEM FOR USE IN THE APPLICATION AND REMOVAL OF TATTOOS AND OTHER SKIN TREATMENTS BYRD, BRIGID K 28d overdue
18091746 SYSTEM FOR USE IN THE APPLICATION AND REMOVAL OF TATTOOS AND OTHER SKIN TREATMENTS MCGRATH, ERIN E 12d
18731630 INTERNAL PLATFORM SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR AN OFFSHORE FOUNDATION STRUCTURE TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 29d
18729984 WIND TURBINE CABLE CONNECTOR MONITORING METHOD AND DEVICE LIN, ERICA S Y —
18291473 WIND TURBINE BLADE INSTALLATION APPARATUS AND METHOD OF INSTALLING A WIND TURBINE BLADE CAMPOS JR, JUAN J —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18091797 SYSTEM FOR USE IN THE APPLICATION AND REMOVAL OF TATTOOS AND OTHER SKIN TREATMENTS BYRD, BRIGID K 28d overdue
18091746 SYSTEM FOR USE IN THE APPLICATION AND REMOVAL OF TATTOOS AND OTHER SKIN TREATMENTS MCGRATH, ERIN E 12d
18731630 INTERNAL PLATFORM SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR AN OFFSHORE FOUNDATION STRUCTURE TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 29d
18291473 WIND TURBINE BLADE INSTALLATION APPARATUS AND METHOD OF INSTALLING A WIND TURBINE BLADE CAMPOS JR, JUAN J —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
ØRSTED WIND POWER A/S 4
Rejuvatek Medical Inc. 2

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37712
36781
24391

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18729984 WIND TURBINE CABLE CONNECTOR MONITORING METHOD AND DEVICE ØRSTED WIND POWER A/S LIN, ERICA S Y §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2024
18731630 INTERNAL PLATFORM SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR AN OFFSHORE FOUNDATION STRUCTURE ØRSTED WIND POWER A/S TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 3678 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Jun 03, 2024
18291473 WIND TURBINE BLADE INSTALLATION APPARATUS AND METHOD OF INSTALLING A WIND TURBINE BLADE ØRSTED WIND POWER A/S CAMPOS JR, JUAN J §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 23, 2024
18372430 OFFSHORE EQUIPMENT DESTRUCTION APPARATUS AND METHOD ØRSTED WIND POWER A/S SCOTT, RANDY A 2439 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Sep 25, 2023
18091797 SYSTEM FOR USE IN THE APPLICATION AND REMOVAL OF TATTOOS AND OTHER SKIN TREATMENTS Rejuvatek Medical Inc. BYRD, BRIGID K 3771 §103§112 Non-Final OA 28d overdue Pending Dec 30, 2022
18091746 SYSTEM FOR USE IN THE APPLICATION AND REMOVAL OF TATTOOS AND OTHER SKIN TREATMENTS Rejuvatek Medical Inc. MCGRATH, ERIN E 3771 §103§112 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Dec 30, 2022

Managing Sandbright, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month