Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Sdip LLC

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SDIP LLC operates in Chemistry & Materials, having handled 58 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 85.71, showing a strong ability to secure patents in this technical field. This success rate suggests that the firm is effective at defining and defending chemical and material science claims, which often face rigorous scrutiny during the examination process.

The firm currently manages 4 pending office actions. An avg office actions per allowance of 4.6 indicates a more intensive prosecution cycle, requiring nearly five office actions on average to reach an allowance. This suggests that the firm's cases in chemistry and materials often involve complex and prolonged negotiations with examiners, requiring persistent advocacy and multiple rounds of technical responses to achieve a successful outcome.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=58 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.7%
Allowance Rate
n=58
+0.87σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=58
4.6
OAs to Allowance
n=30
+0.05σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=30
980 days
Time to Allowance
n=30
+14.8pp
Interview Lift
n=58
17.1%
RCE Rate
n=58
1.5%
Appeal Rate
n=58

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=7 (min 20)
—
§102 Overcome
n=12 (min 20)
72.7%
§103 Overcome
n=22
75.0%
§112 Overcome
n=28

Specialization & Scale

A23K, A61K, C07K
Top CPC Subclasses
31%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=58
0
Practitioners
n=58
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=58 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
1
Medium (20%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MEAH, MOHAMMAD Y 1 70.7% +42.8%
MUKHOPADHYAY, BHASKAR 1 28.2% +37.0%
SHELLHAMMER, JAMES PAUL 1 10.0% +18.8%
GERLA, STEPHANIE RAE 1 16.3% +30.6%
SAEED, ALI S 1 31.6% +33.8%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17093557 MICROBIAL-BASED PROCESS FOR IMPROVED QUALITY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE GERLA, STEPHANIE RAE 45d overdue
15159726 METHOD FOR INCREASING THE UTILIZATION OF SOYBEAN PROTEIN BY SALMONID FISH SAEED, ALI S 16d
18608400 Microbial-Based Process for high Quality Protein Concentrate MUKHOPADHYAY, BHASKAR 54d
18093889 Microbial-Based Process for High Quality Protein Concentrate SHELLHAMMER, JAMES PAUL —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17093557 MICROBIAL-BASED PROCESS FOR IMPROVED QUALITY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE GERLA, STEPHANIE RAE 45d overdue
15159726 METHOD FOR INCREASING THE UTILIZATION OF SOYBEAN PROTEIN BY SALMONID FISH SAEED, ALI S 16d
18608400 Microbial-Based Process for high Quality Protein Concentrate MUKHOPADHYAY, BHASKAR 54d
18984297 MODIFIED BACTERIAL PROTEIN EXPRESSION SYSTEM MEAH, MOHAMMAD Y —
18093889 Microbial-Based Process for High Quality Protein Concentrate SHELLHAMMER, JAMES PAUL —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16521
17921
17931
17911
16161

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18984297 MODIFIED BACTERIAL PROTEIN EXPRESSION SYSTEM The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York MEAH, MOHAMMAD Y 1652 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2024
18608400 Microbial-Based Process for high Quality Protein Concentrate The South Dakota Board Of Regents, AS Governing Board For South Dakota State University MUKHOPADHYAY, BHASKAR 1792 §103 Non-Final OA 54d Pending Mar 18, 2024
18093889 Microbial-Based Process for High Quality Protein Concentrate Prairie Aquatech LLC SHELLHAMMER, JAMES PAUL 1793 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 06, 2023
17093557 MICROBIAL-BASED PROCESS FOR IMPROVED QUALITY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE Prairie Aquatech LLC GERLA, STEPHANIE RAE 1791 §103§112 Final Rejection 45d overdue Pending Nov 09, 2020
15159726 METHOD FOR INCREASING THE UTILIZATION OF SOYBEAN PROTEIN BY SALMONID FISH Indiana Soybean Alliance, Inc. SAEED, ALI S 1616 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 16d Pending May 19, 2016

Managing Sdip LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sdip LLC's patent allowance rate?

85.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Sdip LLC were allowed, across 58 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Sdip LLC average before allowance?

4.60 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Sdip LLC have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month