Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green, Pa

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security

19 pending office actions • 7 clients • 16 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 19 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SHEEHAN PHINNEY BASS & GREEN, PA focuses on the Computing & Software technology area, with 1013 career applications. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate pct of 87.12. Currently, there are 15 pending office actions in its docket. The 1013 career applications show a foundation of experience in software-related patent law.

The average office actions per allowance for this profile is 3.35. This metric helps set expectations for the number of office actions required to reach an allowance in the Computing & Software field. The 87.12 resolved allowance rate pct reflects the degree of success for the 1013 career applications managed by the firm. With 15 pending office actions, the firm is actively processing its current workload. These data points together illustrate the firm's historical performance and its current status within its primary technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1013 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.1%
Allowance Rate
n=1013
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1013
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=602
-0.07σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=602
960 days
Time to Allowance
n=602
+4.2pp
Interview Lift
n=1013
29.8%
RCE Rate
n=1013
0.9%
Appeal Rate
n=1013

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

71.0%
§101 Overcome
n=100
81.7%
§102 Overcome
n=246
80.3%
§103 Overcome
n=436
86.1%
§112 Overcome
n=267

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, H04N
Top CPC Subclasses
21%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1013
0
Practitioners
n=1013
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1013 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

19
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

12
Hard (63%)
6
Medium (32%)
1
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (5%)
§101 + other6 (32%)
§103 only6 (32%)
§112 only1 (5%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (26%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
5% of docket
12
Information Tech
63% of docket
1
Communications
5% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
5
Business / Other
26% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

190 h
Manual time on pending OAs
38 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
66 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 2 6.1% +10.0%
SAXENA, AKASH 2 49.1% +30.5%
MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 2 67.3% +13.4%
MUSSELMAN, TIMOTHY A 1 58.2% +25.9%
MERCADO, GABRIEL S 1 42.9% +25.7%
KHAN, MOEEN 1 69.5% +60.7%
CHORBAJI, MONZER R 1 76.4% +21.3%
RAHIM, MONJUR 1 84.6% +16.4%
CHEN, YU 1 67.9% +29.6%
POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN 1 51.9% +77.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18842501 System and Method for Light Data File Upload Prevention RAHIM, MONJUR 85d overdue

Hard Cases (12)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18041807 AUTOMATIC DESIGN OF MOLECULES HAVING SPECIFIC DESIRABLE CHARACTERISTICS HUANG, YAO D 111d overdue
17735198 MANAGING ITERATIONS AND BRANCHING IN DESIGN MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 85d overdue
17760527 MANAGING AND ROUTING OF ENDPOINT TELEMETRY USING REALMS LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 18d overdue
19013636 SYSTEM AND METHOD PROVIDING AUTOMATED FEEDBACK FOR WRITERS MUSSELMAN, TIMOTHY A —
18923045 DYNAMIC INPUT INTERACTION MERCADO, GABRIEL S —
18842942 SPACE DECONTAMINATION METHOD AND SPACE DECONTAMINATION DEVICE CHORBAJI, MONZER R —
18800452 MANAGING AND ROUTING OF ENDPOINT TELEMETRY USING REALMS LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER —
18703346 DETECTING INSIDER USER BEHAVIOR THREATS BY COMPARING A USER’S BEHAVIOR TO THE USER’S PRIOR BEHAVIOR POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN —

Interview Candidates (13)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18842501 System and Method for Light Data File Upload Prevention RAHIM, MONJUR 85d overdue
17735198 MANAGING ITERATIONS AND BRANCHING IN DESIGN MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 85d overdue
17760527 MANAGING AND ROUTING OF ENDPOINT TELEMETRY USING REALMS LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 18d overdue
19013636 SYSTEM AND METHOD PROVIDING AUTOMATED FEEDBACK FOR WRITERS MUSSELMAN, TIMOTHY A —
18923045 DYNAMIC INPUT INTERACTION MERCADO, GABRIEL S —
18892952 Preventing Disclosure of Sensitive Information in Attempting to Utilize Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Through an In-line Interface KHAN, MOEEN —
18842942 SPACE DECONTAMINATION METHOD AND SPACE DECONTAMINATION DEVICE CHORBAJI, MONZER R —
18800452 MANAGING AND ROUTING OF ENDPOINT TELEMETRY USING REALMS LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24363
21882
21892
17991
26131
21241
21871
24961
21421
21861

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19013636 SYSTEM AND METHOD PROVIDING AUTOMATED FEEDBACK FOR WRITERS Thinkcerca.Com, Inc. MUSSELMAN, TIMOTHY A §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 08, 2025
18923045 DYNAMIC INPUT INTERACTION Human Systems, Inc. MERCADO, GABRIEL S §101§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 22, 2024
18892952 Preventing Disclosure of Sensitive Information in Attempting to Utilize Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Through an In-line Interface Proofpoint, Inc. KHAN, MOEEN 2436 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 23, 2024
18842942 SPACE DECONTAMINATION METHOD AND SPACE DECONTAMINATION DEVICE Nippon Air Conditioning Services Co., Ltd. CHORBAJI, MONZER R 1799 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18842501 System and Method for Light Data File Upload Prevention Proofpoint, Inc. RAHIM, MONJUR 2436 §103 Non-Final OA 85d overdue Pending Aug 29, 2024
18800452 MANAGING AND ROUTING OF ENDPOINT TELEMETRY USING REALMS Proofpoint, Inc. LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 12, 2024
18788590 System and Method for Retrieval of Two Dimensional Drawings DASSAULT SYSTEMES CHEN, YU 2613 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 30, 2024
18703346 DETECTING INSIDER USER BEHAVIOR THREATS BY COMPARING A USER’S BEHAVIOR TO THE USER’S PRIOR BEHAVIOR Proofpoint, Inc. POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN 2436 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 21, 2024
18326284 Simulation methodology for Fuel Cell stacks using RVE technique DASSAULT SYSTEMES MARKS, AARIC R §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 31, 2023
18321837 Method for Parametrized Multi-compartment Housing Model Creation DASSAULT SYSTEMES SAXENA, AKASH §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2023
18041807 AUTOMATIC DESIGN OF MOLECULES HAVING SPECIFIC DESIRABLE CHARACTERISTICS Nnaisense, SA HUANG, YAO D 2124 §101§103 Non-Final OA 111d overdue Pending Feb 16, 2023
18162764 Computer simulation methodology to analyze mass, momentum, energy and charge transport in a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell DASSAULT SYSTEMES HANN, JAY B 2187 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 01, 2023
18046972 System and Methods for Automatic Repair of Missing Mate References DASSAULT SYSTEMES SAXENA, AKASH 2188 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 17, 2022
18046976 System and Methods for Automatic Repair of Missing Mate References for Tessellated Data DASSAULT SYSTEMES MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 2189 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 17, 2022
17735198 MANAGING ITERATIONS AND BRANCHING IN DESIGN DASSAULT SYSTEMES MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 2189 §101§102§112 Final Rejection 85d overdue Pending May 03, 2022
17760527 MANAGING AND ROUTING OF ENDPOINT TELEMETRY USING REALMS Proofpoint, Inc. LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 2496 §103§112 Final Rejection 18d overdue Pending Mar 15, 2022
17585641 Method for Suggesting Mates for a User Selected Modeled Component DASSAULT SYSTEMES JIANG, HAIMEI 2142 §103 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Jan 27, 2022
17580695 Critical Points for Test Data Preprocessing DASSAULT SYSTEMES DRAPEAU, SIMEON PAUL 2188 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 21, 2022
17210804 In-situ formulation of calibrated models in multi component physics simulation DASSAULT SYSTEMES DEBNATH, NUPUR 2186 §103 Final Rejection 114d overdue Pending Mar 24, 2021

Managing Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green, Pa's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month