Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Shield Intellectual Property Pc

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

13 pending office actions • 4 clients • 12 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Shield Intellectual Property PC has 16 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 896 career applications. The profile combines current examination activity with a defined application record in this technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 95.43%, and allowed matters averaged 3.9 office actions per allowance. The rate measures outcomes among resolved matters, while the action average indicates the examination activity associated with allowances. Practitioners can use these measures to evaluate historical results separately from the active docket and to assess the level of prosecution interaction reflected in allowed cases.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=896 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

95.4%
Allowance Rate
n=896
+0.64σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=896
3.9
OAs to Allowance
n=648
+0.07σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=648
884 days
Time to Allowance
n=648
+2.5pp
Interview Lift
n=896
34.9%
RCE Rate
n=896
2.3%
Appeal Rate
n=896

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

88.6%
§101 Overcome
n=141
88.6%
§102 Overcome
n=184
89.9%
§103 Overcome
n=406
91.6%
§112 Overcome
n=226

Specialization & Scale

H04L, G06F, H04N
Top CPC Subclasses
46%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=896
0
Practitioners
n=896
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=896 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (69%)
4
Medium (31%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§101 + other6 (46%)
§103 only3 (23%)
§102 only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (15%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
31% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
9
Mechanical / Eng
69% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AUSTIN, JAMIE H 2 24.9% +32.7%
HOANG, HIEU T 1 80.9% +16.3%
BARKER, TODD L 1 75.5% +23.4%
MOORE, WHITNEY 1 88.2% +10.1%
FEREJA, SAMUEL D 1 75.0% +10.1%
ROBERT, DANIEL M 1 77.8% +9.9%
HELLNER, MARK 1 90.4% +8.6%
ALVAREZ, RAQUEL 1 49.7% +7.4%
ANDREI, RADU 1 36.7% +19.5%
KANG, TIMOTHY J 1 45.5% +27.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19058380 MINIMIZED LATENCY INGRESS ARBITRATION HOANG, HIEU T —

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18231642 ENSEMBLE-BASED MULTIMEDIA ASSET RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM ALVAREZ, RAQUEL 21d
16809430 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES AUSTIN, JAMIE H 28d
18100286 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES AUSTIN, JAMIE H 34d
19017020 MULTI-DATAPATH SUPPORT FOR LOW LATENCY TRAFFIC MANAGER BARKER, TODD L —
19007376 MOTORCYCLE LANE SPLITTING DETECTION SYSTEM MOORE, WHITNEY —
18373512 HYBRID 3D SENSING USING TIME-OF-FLIGHT, EVENT-BASED STRUCTURED LIGHT AND STEREO VISION HELLNER, MARK —
17949811 DUAL-OPTIMIZATION OF TARGETED DIGITAL ASSETS UNDER VOLUME AND POSITION CONSTRAINTS ANDREI, RADU —
17942686 METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA, AND SYSTEM FOR PRESENTATION OF DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON ASSESSED VALUE KANG, TIMOTHY J —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18856274 SIGN PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODING FEREJA, SAMUEL D 9d overdue
16809430 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES AUSTIN, JAMIE H 28d
18100286 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES AUSTIN, JAMIE H 34d
19058380 MINIMIZED LATENCY INGRESS ARBITRATION HOANG, HIEU T —
19017020 MULTI-DATAPATH SUPPORT FOR LOW LATENCY TRAFFIC MANAGER BARKER, TODD L —
19007376 MOTORCYCLE LANE SPLITTING DETECTION SYSTEM MOORE, WHITNEY —
17949811 DUAL-OPTIMIZATION OF TARGETED DIGITAL ASSETS UNDER VOLUME AND POSITION CONSTRAINTS ANDREI, RADU —
17942686 METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA, AND SYSTEM FOR PRESENTATION OF DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON ASSESSED VALUE KANG, TIMOTHY J —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
IRIS.TV, INC. 5
Volkswagen 4
MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD 2
Dolby 2

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24492
36252
36461
24871
36651
36451
36221
36971
36891
24841

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19058380 MINIMIZED LATENCY INGRESS ARBITRATION Marvell Asia Pte. Ltd. HOANG, HIEU T 2449 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 20, 2025
19017020 MULTI-DATAPATH SUPPORT FOR LOW LATENCY TRAFFIC MANAGER Marvell Asia Pte. Ltd. BARKER, TODD L 2449 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 10, 2025
19007376 MOTORCYCLE LANE SPLITTING DETECTION SYSTEM Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft MOORE, WHITNEY 3646 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 31, 2024
18856274 SIGN PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODING Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation FEREJA, SAMUEL D 2487 §103 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending Oct 11, 2024
18541363 TRANSFORMER-BASED AI PLANNER FOR LANE CHANGING ON MULTI-LANE ROAD Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft ROBERT, DANIEL M 3665 §103 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Dec 15, 2023
18373512 HYBRID 3D SENSING USING TIME-OF-FLIGHT, EVENT-BASED STRUCTURED LIGHT AND STEREO VISION Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft HELLNER, MARK 3645 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2023
18231642 ENSEMBLE-BASED MULTIMEDIA ASSET RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM Iris.Tv, Inc. ALVAREZ, RAQUEL 3622 §101DP Non-Final OA 21d Pending Aug 08, 2023
18100286 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES Iris.Tv, Inc. AUSTIN, JAMIE H 3625 §101§112 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Jan 23, 2023
17949811 DUAL-OPTIMIZATION OF TARGETED DIGITAL ASSETS UNDER VOLUME AND POSITION CONSTRAINTS Iris.Tv, Inc. ANDREI, RADU 3697 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 21, 2022
17942686 METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA, AND SYSTEM FOR PRESENTATION OF DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON ASSESSED VALUE Iris.Tv, Inc. KANG, TIMOTHY J 3689 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 12, 2022
17900738 VIRTUAL REALITY CINEMA-IMMERSIVE MOVIE WATCHING FOR HEADMOUNTED DISPLAYS Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation NASRI, MARYAM A 2484 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 31, 2022
17874753 METHOD FOR REDUCING CARBON FOOTPRINT LEVERAGING A COST FUNCTION FOR FOCUSED OPTIMIZATION Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft GODBOLD, DAVID GARRISON 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 27, 2022
16809430 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES Iris.Tv, Inc. AUSTIN, JAMIE H 3625 §101§103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Mar 04, 2020

Managing Shield Intellectual Property Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Shield Intellectual Property Pc's patent allowance rate?

95.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Shield Intellectual Property Pc were allowed, across 896 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Shield Intellectual Property Pc average before allowance?

3.90 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Shield Intellectual Property Pc have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 12 examiners in 11 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month