Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Silver Legal LLC

5 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=82 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

79.1%
Allowance Rate
n=82
+0.38σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=82
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=34
-0.48σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=34
874 days
Time to Allowance
n=34
+14.0pp
Interview Lift
n=82
32.6%
RCE Rate
n=82
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=82

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=2 (min 20)
§102 Overcome
n=4 (min 20)
59.3%
§103 Overcome
n=27
§112 Overcome
n=11 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

A61B, G06F, G16H
Top CPC Subclasses
19%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=82
1
Practitioners
n=82
82.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=82

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (60%)
1
Easy (20%)
1
Unknown (20%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (60%)
§112 only1 (20%)
No statute on record1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
80% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MARCHEWKA, MATTHEW R 1 45.2% +69.6%
NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 1 52.6% +40.1%
ORTIZ, ADAM C 1 65.9% +34.8%
LEDERER, SARAH B 1 55.7% +39.2%
PEARSON, AMANDA HYEONWOO 1 73.3% +27.8%

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19156889 A DEVICE FOR IMPACT PROTECTION MARCHEWKA, MATTHEW R 20d
17838311 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED PROCESSING, REGISTRATION, SEGMENTATION, ANALYSIS, VALIDATION, AND VISUALIZATION OF STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED DATA PEARSON, AMANDA HYEONWOO 26d
18993575 WEARABLE AND AUTOMATED ULTRASOUND THERAPY DEVICES AND METHODS NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC
18812973 Patient Transfer Device ORTIZ, ADAM C
18192587 RECONFIGURABLE EXOSKELETON DEVICE, MOUNTING PAD, MOTION CONTROL MODULE, MOUNTING PAD MOTION CONTROL MODULE SYSTEM, AND A METHOD OF REMOUNTING THE MOTION CONTROL MODULE LEDERER, SARAH B

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37321
37971
36731
37851
26661

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19156889 A DEVICE FOR IMPACT PROTECTION Brite Wind Consulting Limited MARCHEWKA, MATTHEW R 3732 §103 Final Rejection 20d Pending Aug 15, 2025
18993575 WEARABLE AND AUTOMATED ULTRASOUND THERAPY DEVICES AND METHODS Cortery AB NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 3797 §112 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 12, 2025
18812973 Patient Transfer Device Njord International AB ORTIZ, ADAM C 3673 Other Non-Final OA Pending Aug 22, 2024
18192587 RECONFIGURABLE EXOSKELETON DEVICE, MOUNTING PAD, MOTION CONTROL MODULE, MOUNTING PAD MOTION CONTROL MODULE SYSTEM, AND A METHOD OF REMOUNTING THE MOTION CONTROL MODULE Houstonbionics, Inc. LEDERER, SARAH B 3785 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 29, 2023
17838311 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED PROCESSING, REGISTRATION, SEGMENTATION, ANALYSIS, VALIDATION, AND VISUALIZATION OF STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED DATA Neurosimplicity, LLC PEARSON, AMANDA HYEONWOO 2666 §103 Non-Final OA 26d Pending Jun 13, 2022

Managing Silver Legal LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month