Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Thomas E. Lees, LLC

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

11 pending office actions • 10 clients • 11 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Thomas E. Lees LLC has 10 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials and a recorded career application volume of 822. The pending docket and application history together indicate an established prosecution practice with current examination activity.

Its resolved allowance rate is 89.28%, while the average is 2.56 office actions per allowance. These figures describe both the outcome record and the examination activity associated with allowed applications.

For practitioners, the combination of 822 applications and 10 pending actions provides context for assessing current workload against the firm’s recorded career activity. The allowance metric is outcome-focused, while the office-action metric helps frame the response burden before allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=822 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.3%
Allowance Rate
n=822
+0.55σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=822
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=483
-0.63σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=483
951 days
Time to Allowance
n=483
+7.9pp
Interview Lift
n=822
20.3%
RCE Rate
n=822
2.5%
Appeal Rate
n=822

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

78.7%
§101 Overcome
n=61
80.4%
§102 Overcome
n=168
78.3%
§103 Overcome
n=295
78.0%
§112 Overcome
n=236

Specialization & Scale

G01N, G06F, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=822
1
Practitioners
n=822
822.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=822

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (64%)
4
Medium (36%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (27%)
§103 only1 (9%)
§102 only2 (18%)
Double-patenting + other1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (36%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
36% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
27% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
36% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A 1 58.5% +20.3%
MERCADO, LOUIS A 1 78.6% +18.7%
BURNS, TREMESHA WILLIS 1 78.2% +17.2%
HERNANDEZ-KENNEY, JOSE 1 54.7% +22.5%
TOTH, KAREN E 1 46.4% +25.8%
BAREFORD, KATHERINE A 1 13.9% +28.6%
GILLESPIE, NICOLE KATHLEEN 1 54.5% +50.3%
POLLOCK, AUSTIN M 1 51.2% +36.2%
DAVIS, CYNTHIA L 1 71.4% +30.2%
HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 1 40.6% +50.8%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17313707 PATHOGEN TESTING ROSSI, VY BUI 87d overdue
17601104 Identification and Quantification of A Ventilatory Disturbance Causing Incorrect Measurement Of Arterial Acid-Base Status HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 31d overdue
18304664 NIOBIUM-BASED ALLOYS WITH IMPROVED STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE STRUCTURAL APPLICATIONS POLLOCK, AUSTIN M 12d
17927076 COMPENSATING FOR HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE DISRUPTIONS DAVIS, CYNTHIA L 63d
18411707 WEARABLE BIOSENSOR TOTH, KAREN E —
18539459 SELECTIVE POLYMER METALIZATION FOR COMPOSITE MATERIALS BAREFORD, KATHERINE A —
18509889 CONTROLLABLE AUDIO SYSTEM MODEL GILLESPIE, NICOLE KATHLEEN —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17601104 Identification and Quantification of A Ventilatory Disturbance Causing Incorrect Measurement Of Arterial Acid-Base Status HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 31d overdue
18304664 NIOBIUM-BASED ALLOYS WITH IMPROVED STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE STRUCTURAL APPLICATIONS POLLOCK, AUSTIN M 12d
17927076 COMPENSATING FOR HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE DISRUPTIONS DAVIS, CYNTHIA L 63d
19264253 METHOD AND SENSOR SYSTEM FOR DETECTING OBJECTS ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A —
19088323 MODULAR CLIPPING SYSTEM MERCADO, LOUIS A —
18958434 ULTRA-THIN LAMINATED GLASS ASSEMBLY WITH ELECTRIC CIRCUITRY BURNS, TREMESHA WILLIS —
18928605 APPLYING TEXTURE TO HARD SUBSTRATE HERNANDEZ-KENNEY, JOSE —
18411707 WEARABLE BIOSENSOR TOTH, KAREN E —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37912
36681
36771
28471
17171
17181
28371
17381
28571
16851

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19264253 METHOD AND SENSOR SYSTEM FOR DETECTING OBJECTS Evitado Technologies GmbH ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A 3668 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 09, 2025
19088323 MODULAR CLIPPING SYSTEM Bowerbags LLC MERCADO, LOUIS A 3677 §102§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 24, 2025
18958434 ULTRA-THIN LAMINATED GLASS ASSEMBLY WITH ELECTRIC CIRCUITRY Fuyao Glass America Inc. BURNS, TREMESHA WILLIS 2847 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 25, 2024
18928605 APPLYING TEXTURE TO HARD SUBSTRATE Hesseling & Sons, LLC HERNANDEZ-KENNEY, JOSE 1717 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 28, 2024
18411707 WEARABLE BIOSENSOR Cornerstone Research Group, Inc. TOTH, KAREN E 3791 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 12, 2024
18539459 SELECTIVE POLYMER METALIZATION FOR COMPOSITE MATERIALS University Of Dayton Research Institute BAREFORD, KATHERINE A 1718 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 14, 2023
18509889 CONTROLLABLE AUDIO SYSTEM MODEL Neural Dsp Technologies OY GILLESPIE, NICOLE KATHLEEN 2837 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2023
18304664 NIOBIUM-BASED ALLOYS WITH IMPROVED STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE STRUCTURAL APPLICATIONS Mrl Materials Resources LLC POLLOCK, AUSTIN M 1738 §103§112 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Apr 21, 2023
17927076 COMPENSATING FOR HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE DISRUPTIONS BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE DAVIS, CYNTHIA L 2857 §101§103 Non-Final OA 63d Pending Nov 22, 2022
17601104 Identification and Quantification of A Ventilatory Disturbance Causing Incorrect Measurement Of Arterial Acid-Base Status Aalborg University HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 3791 §101§112 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Oct 04, 2021
17313707 PATHOGEN TESTING BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE ROSSI, VY BUI 1685 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 87d overdue Pending May 06, 2021

Managing Thomas E. Lees, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Thomas E. Lees, LLC's patent allowance rate?

89.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Thomas E. Lees, LLC were allowed, across 822 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Thomas E. Lees, LLC average before allowance?

2.56 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Thomas E. Lees, LLC have?

11 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 10 clients, before 11 examiners in 10 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month