Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ward And Smith, P.A.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

11 pending office actions • 9 clients • 9 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

WARD AND SMITH, P.A. focuses on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems, with 954 career applications. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate pct of 91.96. This rate demonstrates its results in securing patent grants in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. Practitioners can use the 954 career applications to evaluate the firm's historical outcomes. These metrics offer a basis for setting expectations for future filings in this technical field. The 91.96 resolved allowance rate pct provides a measure of success for applications managed by the firm.

The firm has 10 pending office actions. Its avg office actions per allowance is 2.27. This 2.27 avg office actions per allowance reflects the number of examiner interactions typically required to reach an allowance. With 10 pending office actions, the firm continues to manage its active cases. The 2.27 avg office actions per allowance helps practitioners estimate the resources needed for the examination phase. The 91.96 resolved allowance rate pct and the 10 pending office actions provide a view of the firm's performance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=954 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.0%
Allowance Rate
n=954
+0.53σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=954
2.3
OAs to Allowance
n=663
-0.81σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=663
793 days
Time to Allowance
n=663
+2.0pp
Interview Lift
n=954
16.2%
RCE Rate
n=954
0.7%
Appeal Rate
n=954

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

55.0%
§101 Overcome
n=40
82.5%
§102 Overcome
n=234
85.0%
§103 Overcome
n=333
88.7%
§112 Overcome
n=204

Specialization & Scale

H01L, H10D, H10B
Top CPC Subclasses
24%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=954
4
Practitioners
n=954
238.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=954

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 60 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (64%)
4
Medium (36%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (9%)
§101 + other3 (27%)
§103 only3 (27%)
§102 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (27%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
55% of docket
5
Business / Other
45% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MORRIS, KATHERINE ELIZABETH 3 95.3% +5.3%
CARREIRO, CAITLIN ANN 1 46.0% +38.4%
BAIG, SENIYA 1 — —
DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R 1 68.9% +14.1%
WINSTON III, EDWARD B 1 19.8% +31.0%
TRIGGS, ANDREW J 1 66.7% +27.8%
GILLS, KURTIS 1 57.9% +29.2%
FU, HAO 1 50.1% +24.8%
MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 1 24.8% +25.0%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
35524897 Tea packaging box MORRIS, KATHERINE ELIZABETH 47d
35524887 Tea packaging box MORRIS, KATHERINE ELIZABETH —
35524902 Tea packaging box MORRIS, KATHERINE ELIZABETH —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18807292 Couple-Based Digital Reproductive Health Platform System and Method WINSTON III, EDWARD B 24d overdue
18637819 Employment and/or Income Verification System and Methods FU, HAO 50d
17494570 Parcel Margin Optimization (PMO) System for and Methods of Generating and Optimizing Discounted Parcel Shipping Prices MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 53d
19426958 Lumbosacral Orthosis (LSO) and Method of Using Same CARREIRO, CAITLIN ANN —
18989157 Live Fire Training System and Method Including a Modular Live Fire Burn Room for Training Firefighters BAIG, SENIYA —
18924231 Coated Carton and Method of Making Same DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R —
18640227 System for Optimizing Product Distribution to Retail Outlets GILLS, KURTIS —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18807292 Couple-Based Digital Reproductive Health Platform System and Method WINSTON III, EDWARD B 24d overdue
18637819 Employment and/or Income Verification System and Methods FU, HAO 50d
17494570 Parcel Margin Optimization (PMO) System for and Methods of Generating and Optimizing Discounted Parcel Shipping Prices MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 53d
19426958 Lumbosacral Orthosis (LSO) and Method of Using Same CARREIRO, CAITLIN ANN —
18924231 Coated Carton and Method of Making Same DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R —
18766795 Pedestal Paver Lock Down Systems and Methods TRIGGS, ANDREW J —
18640227 System for Optimizing Product Distribution to Retail Outlets GILLS, KURTIS —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
29233
37861
36831
36351
36241
36951
36281

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19426958 Lumbosacral Orthosis (LSO) and Method of Using Same Motif Medical, LLC CARREIRO, CAITLIN ANN 3786 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2025
35524887 Tea packaging box Bettys & Taylors Group Ltd. MORRIS, KATHERINE ELIZABETH 2923 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 17, 2025
35524902 Tea packaging box Bettys & Taylors Group Ltd. MORRIS, KATHERINE ELIZABETH 2923 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 17, 2025
35524897 Tea packaging box Bettys & Taylors Group Ltd. MORRIS, KATHERINE ELIZABETH 2923 §103 Final Rejection 47d Pending Jan 17, 2025
18989157 Live Fire Training System and Method Including a Modular Live Fire Burn Room for Training Firefighters D.R. Reynolds Company, Inc. BAIG, SENIYA §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18924231 Coated Carton and Method of Making Same Inno-Pak, LLC DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2024
18807292 Couple-Based Digital Reproductive Health Platform System and Method Vie Science, Inc. WINSTON III, EDWARD B 3683 §101§103 Final Rejection 24d overdue Pending Aug 16, 2024
18766795 Pedestal Paver Lock Down Systems and Methods Piedmont Innovative Products, LLC TRIGGS, ANDREW J 3635 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 09, 2024
18640227 System for Optimizing Product Distribution to Retail Outlets Analogy Partners, LLC GILLS, KURTIS 3624 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2024
18637819 Employment and/or Income Verification System and Methods Verificationprofessional, LLC FU, HAO 3695 §101§103 Final Rejection 50d Pending Apr 17, 2024
17494570 Parcel Margin Optimization (PMO) System for and Methods of Generating and Optimizing Discounted Parcel Shipping Prices Transimpact, LLC MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 3628 §101 Non-Final OA 53d Pending Oct 05, 2021

Managing Ward And Smith, P.A.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month