Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
7 pending office actions • 3 clients • 7 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Wash Park IP Ltd. -- DISH handles patent prosecution in the Computing & Software technology area, with 45 career applications on record. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 68.75 percent. Its prosecution history shows an average of 2.18 office actions per allowance. Currently, the firm is managing 3 pending office actions.
The 45 career applications and 68.75 percent allowance rate establish the firm's historical performance in this sector. The 2.18 average helps practitioners understand the typical procedural requirements for reaching an allowance. With 3 pending office actions, the firm maintains its presence in Computing & Software. This data set reflects the firm's documented experience and current workload within the patent office. The recorded metrics provide a baseline for procedural duration in this specific field. Practitioners can evaluate the intensity of examiner interaction and resource requirements based on these historical figures. These statistics offer a view of the firm's prosecution profile.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (14%) |
| §103 only | 2 (29%) |
| §112 only | 1 (14%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (14%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (14%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (14%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BATURAY, ALICIA | 1 | 81.1% | +18.2% |
| TILAHUN, ALAZAR | 1 | 71.2% | +14.6% |
| VUONG, QUOCHIEN B | 1 | 89.8% | -0.6% |
| MASUD, ROKIB | 1 | 68.9% | +0.2% |
| MAGLOIRE, ELISABETH BENOIT | 1 | 89.7% | +7.9% |
| DECKER, CASSANDRA L | 1 | 72.3% | +15.9% |
| ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK | 1 | 63.3% | +24.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19065923 | Network Backbone Fault Management | BATURAY, ALICIA | — |
| 19014815 | IDENTIFYING SIGNAL INTERFERENCE SOURCES | VUONG, QUOCHIEN B | — |
| 18894821 | Customer Specific Network Slicing | MAGLOIRE, ELISABETH BENOIT | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18965362 | Payment Verification Using Multi-Factor Authentication | MASUD, ROKIB | — |
| 18211347 | Electronic Device Enclosures | ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19036469 | Unique Remote Experience of Live Event | TILAHUN, ALAZAR | 28d |
| 19065923 | Network Backbone Fault Management | BATURAY, ALICIA | — |
| 18541246 | Auto-detect, Predict and Notify Mobile Device Users of Service Impacts | DECKER, CASSANDRA L | — |
| 18211347 | Electronic Device Enclosures | ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Boost SubscriberCo | 4 |
| DISH Network LLC | 2 |
| Boos Subscriberco LLC | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2424 | 1 |
| 3627 | 1 |
| 2466 | 1 |
| 3637 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19065923 | Network Backbone Fault Management | BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO L.L.C. | BATURAY, ALICIA | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 27, 2025 | |
| 19036469 | Unique Remote Experience of Live Event | DISH NETWORK L.L.C. | TILAHUN, ALAZAR | 2424 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 28d | Pending | Jan 24, 2025 |
| 19014815 | IDENTIFYING SIGNAL INTERFERENCE SOURCES | BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO L.L.C. | VUONG, QUOCHIEN B | §112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 09, 2025 | |
| 18965362 | Payment Verification Using Multi-Factor Authentication | Boos Subscriberco LLC | MASUD, ROKIB | 3627 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 02, 2024 |
| 18894821 | Customer Specific Network Slicing | BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO L.L.C. | MAGLOIRE, ELISABETH BENOIT | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 24, 2024 | |
| 18541246 | Auto-detect, Predict and Notify Mobile Device Users of Service Impacts | BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO L.L.C. | DECKER, CASSANDRA L | 2466 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 15, 2023 |
| 18211347 | Electronic Device Enclosures | DISH NETWORK L.L.C. | ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK | 3637 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial