Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 7 clients • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. specializes in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering, having handled 1075 career applications. The firm has achieved a high resolved allowance rate of 91.96 percent, which indicates a very high probability of success for applications filed through this firm. Currently, there are 8 pending office actions on its docket. The firm averages 3.93 office actions per allowance, suggesting a prosecution style that involves significant persistence and multiple interactions with patent examiners.

This average of 3.93 indicates that the firm is prepared to engage in extended dialogues to secure the 91.96 percent allowance rate. For clients in the mechanical and medical device sectors, these figures suggest that while the process may require several rounds of office actions, the eventual outcome is highly likely to be a granted patent. With 1075 career applications, the firm has demonstrated its ability to maintain high success standards over time. The 8 pending office actions suggest a focused current workload, allowing the firm to apply its average of 3.93 office actions per allowance effectively to achieve the 91.96 percent allowance rate for its active clients.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1075 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.0%
Allowance Rate
n=1075
+0.79σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1075
3.9
OAs to Allowance
n=629
+0.26σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=629
1090 days
Time to Allowance
n=629
+7.5pp
Interview Lift
n=1075
30.0%
RCE Rate
n=1075
1.0%
Appeal Rate
n=1075

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

81.5%
§101 Overcome
n=108
87.0%
§102 Overcome
n=239
89.0%
§103 Overcome
n=418
91.0%
§112 Overcome
n=301

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, A61K
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1075
2
Practitioners
n=1075
537.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=1075

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
4
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (88%)
1
Medium (12%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (25%)
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COOPER, JONATHAN EPHRAIM 1 46.1% +31.3%
BOECKELMAN, JACOB A 1 35.2% +45.6%
CHAN, KEVIN 1 — —
COLEY, ZADE JAMES 1 72.2% +26.0%
LANE, DANIEL E 1 3.9% +8.3%
MEHTA, BHISMA 1 58.6% +43.3%
OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 1 16.2% +14.1%
TRAN, AMY NMN 1 38.2% +37.0%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18594836 Neurological and Motor Function Screening Apparatus LANE, DANIEL E 51d overdue
18433218 Self-Administered Injection Device And Method MEHTA, BHISMA 5d
17400797 DATA-ADAPTIVE INSIGHT AND ACTION PLATFORM FOR HIGHER EDUCATION TRAN, AMY NMN 9d
18705966 SYSTEM AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION COLEY, ZADE JAMES 12d
17484555 MARKETING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 14d
19237779 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING RESPIRATION COOPER, JONATHAN EPHRAIM 29d
18653947 SYSTEM FOR STOWING AND DEPLOYING AN ACCESSORY ON A WATERCRAFT CHAN, KEVIN —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18433218 Self-Administered Injection Device And Method MEHTA, BHISMA 5d
17400797 DATA-ADAPTIVE INSIGHT AND ACTION PLATFORM FOR HIGHER EDUCATION TRAN, AMY NMN 9d
18705966 SYSTEM AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION COLEY, ZADE JAMES 12d
17484555 MARKETING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 14d
19237779 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING RESPIRATION COOPER, JONATHAN EPHRAIM 29d
18893414 SOLID DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR A SKINCARE ACTIVE INGREDIENT BOECKELMAN, JACOB A —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37911
36151
37751
37151
37831
36221
21261

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19237779 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING RESPIRATION Reflexion Interactive Technologies, Inc. COOPER, JONATHAN EPHRAIM 3791 §103§112 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Jun 13, 2025
18893414 SOLID DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR A SKINCARE ACTIVE INGREDIENT Mana Products, Inc. BOECKELMAN, JACOB A §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2024
18653947 SYSTEM FOR STOWING AND DEPLOYING AN ACCESSORY ON A WATERCRAFT Premier Marine, LLC CHAN, KEVIN 3615 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 02, 2024
18705966 SYSTEM AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION Encapsulemed, Inc. COLEY, ZADE JAMES 3775 §102§103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Apr 29, 2024
18594836 Neurological and Motor Function Screening Apparatus Reflexion Interactive Technologies, Inc. LANE, DANIEL E 3715 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA 51d overdue Pending Mar 04, 2024
18433218 Self-Administered Injection Device And Method Dj Medical, LLC MEHTA, BHISMA 3783 §103§112 Final Rejection 5d Pending Feb 05, 2024
17484555 MARKETING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The Imagine Group, LLC OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 3622 §101 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Sep 24, 2021
17400797 DATA-ADAPTIVE INSIGHT AND ACTION PLATFORM FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Civitas Learning, Inc. TRAN, AMY NMN 2126 §101 Final Rejection 9d Pending Aug 12, 2021

Managing Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month