Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Actimize Ltd.

15 pending office actions • 12 art units • 14 examiners • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
9
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 15 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

7
Overdue
1
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
4
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 15 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (7)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (13%)
10
Medium (67%)
1
Easy (7%)
2
Unknown (13%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (13%)
§103 only10 (67%)
§112 only1 (7%)
No statute on record2 (13%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
8
Information Tech
53% of docket
2
Communications
13% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BUNKER, WILLIAM B 2 79.6% +94.7%
WASAFF, JOHN S. 1 33.4% +43.6%
YEN, ERIC L 1 85.1% +11.6%
LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI 1 83.9% +47.7%
BARRETT, RYAN S 1 64.6% +43.2%
NGUYEN, HENRY K 1 57.5% +30.7%
HAN, BYUNGKWON 1 0.0% +0.0%
NGUYEN, LIZ P 1 61.1% +6.7%
HASBROUCK, MERRITT J 1 10.5% +8.0%
ALABI, OLUWATOSIN O 1 59.8% +22.6%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18645563 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTELLIGENT EVALUATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GENERATED TEXTS YEN, ERIC L 98d overdue
18584720 PRECISION EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GENERATED TEXT SUMMARIES LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI 87d overdue

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18075445 COMPUTERIZED-METHOD AND COMPUTERIZED-SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A CLASSIFICATION MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR IMPLEMENTATION WITH NO TRAINING REQUIREMENT HASBROUCK, MERRITT J 70d overdue
18079910 COMPUTERIZED-METHOD AND COMPUTERIZED-SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING FRAUD TRANSACTIONS IN TRANSACTIONS CLASSIFIED AS LEGIT TRANSACTIONS BY A CLASSIFICATION MACHINE LEARNING MODEL NGUYEN, LIZ P 21d
18149451 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAINING A MACHINE LEARNING NETWORK HAN, BYUNGKWON 76d

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18645563 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTELLIGENT EVALUATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GENERATED TEXTS YEN, ERIC L 98d overdue
18584720 PRECISION EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GENERATED TEXT SUMMARIES LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI 87d overdue
18629309 MONEY MULE DETECTION USING LINK PREDICTION BUNKER, WILLIAM B 78d overdue
17831159 LTP-INDUCED ONLINE INCREMENTAL DEEP LEARNING ALABI, OLUWATOSIN O 15d overdue
18630468 FRAUD ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING AND GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BUNKER, WILLIAM B 8d overdue
18758683 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING TRUST INDICATORS WASAFF, JOHN S. 7d
18322100 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROGRAMMATICALLY GENERATING DECISION RULES FOR ALERT DETECTION ENGINES USING MACHINE LEARNING OPERATIONS NGUYEN, HENRY K 62d
18356346 AUTOMATED RULE CREATION FOR FRAUD DETECTION USING A MACHINE LEARNING-DRIVEN COMPUTING FRAMEWORK BARRETT, RYAN S 79d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2121 3
3691 2
3629 1
2658 1
2656 1
2148 1
3696 1
3695 1
2129 1
2156 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18758683 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING TRUST INDICATORS WASAFF, JOHN S. 3629 §103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Jun 28, 2024
18645563 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTELLIGENT EVALUATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GENERATED TEXTS YEN, ERIC L 2658 §112 Non-Final OA 98d overdue Pending Apr 25, 2024
18630468 FRAUD ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING AND GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BUNKER, WILLIAM B 3691 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Apr 09, 2024
18629309 MONEY MULE DETECTION USING LINK PREDICTION BUNKER, WILLIAM B 3691 §103 Final Rejection 78d overdue Pending Apr 08, 2024
18584720 PRECISION EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GENERATED TEXT SUMMARIES LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI 2656 §103 Non-Final OA 87d overdue Pending Feb 22, 2024
18356346 AUTOMATED RULE CREATION FOR FRAUD DETECTION USING A MACHINE LEARNING-DRIVEN COMPUTING FRAMEWORK BARRETT, RYAN S 2148 Other Non-Final OA 79d Pending Jul 21, 2023
18322100 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROGRAMMATICALLY GENERATING DECISION RULES FOR ALERT DETECTION ENGINES USING MACHINE LEARNING OPERATIONS NGUYEN, HENRY K 2121 §103 Non-Final OA 62d Pending May 23, 2023
18149451 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAINING A MACHINE LEARNING NETWORK HAN, BYUNGKWON 2121 §103 Final Rejection 76d Pending Jan 03, 2023
18079910 COMPUTERIZED-METHOD AND COMPUTERIZED-SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING FRAUD TRANSACTIONS IN TRANSACTIONS CLASSIFIED AS LEGIT TRANSACTIONS BY A CLASSIFICATION MACHINE LEARNING MODEL NGUYEN, LIZ P 3696 §101 Final Rejection 21d Pending Dec 13, 2022
18075445 COMPUTERIZED-METHOD AND COMPUTERIZED-SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A CLASSIFICATION MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR IMPLEMENTATION WITH NO TRAINING REQUIREMENT HASBROUCK, MERRITT J 3695 §101 Final Rejection 70d overdue Pending Dec 06, 2022
17831159 LTP-INDUCED ONLINE INCREMENTAL DEEP LEARNING ALABI, OLUWATOSIN O 2129 §103 Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending Jun 02, 2022
17735137 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDUCING DATA INCONSISTENCY AFTER PURGING CLIENT RECORDS, IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTE (FI) DATABASES, WHEN EXCEEDING RETENTION PERIOD OBISESAN, AUGUSTINE KUNLE 2156 §103 Final Rejection 114d overdue Pending May 03, 2022
17678443 UNSUPERVISED CLUSTERED EXPLANATION-BASED FEATURE SELECTION USING TRANSFER LEARNING FOR LOW FRAUD SCENARIO PHAKOUSONH, DARAVANH 2121 §103 Final Rejection 33d Pending Feb 23, 2022
17585744 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY CREATING MACHINE LEARNED FRAUD DETECTION MODELS MEYER, JACQUELINE CHRISTINE 2144 §103 Non-Final OA 72d Pending Jan 27, 2022
17494176 TRAINING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL USING INCREMENTAL LEARNING WITHOUT FORGETTING MILLER, ALEXANDRIA JOSEPHINE 2142 §103 Final Rejection 8d Pending Oct 05, 2021

Managing Actimize Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month