Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Autodesk Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications

36 pending office actions • 24 art units • 35 examiners • 0 of 36 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 59 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Autodesk Inc. has 34 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The matters are assigned to 34 distinct examiners across 23 distinct art units, indicating broad examiner coverage and repeated matter placement within some art units.

NELESKI, ELIZABETH ROSE is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The absence of a repeated examiner assignment shifts the management challenge toward maintaining consistent positions across many examiner relationships. Art-unit-level review remains useful because the art-unit count is lower than the examiner count and may reveal shared examination context.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

36
Total Pending OAs
21
Non-Final OAs
9
Final Rejections
6
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (4)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

18
Hard (50%)
17
Medium (47%)
1
Easy (3%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (8%)
§101 + other10 (28%)
§103 only16 (44%)
§102 only1 (3%)
Double-patenting only1 (3%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
19
Information Tech
53% of docket
12
Communications
33% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
11% of docket
1
Business / Other
3% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

360 h
Manual time on pending OAs
72 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
126 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
3.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COTHRAN, BERNARD E 2 45.2% +15.5%
NELESKI, ELIZABETH ROSE 1 74.8% +15.7%
SITTA, GRANT 1 72.5% +13.2%
LEE, SARAH YEO 1 100.0% +0.0%
WU, YANNA 1 81.0% +34.1%
STEWART, CRYSTOL 1 33.6% +28.8%
ROBINSON, TERRELL M 1 83.3% +7.8%
PATEL, SHIVANG I 1 74.8% +16.7%
CHOWDHURY, RAYEEZ R 1 81.2% +21.6%
TANG, MICHAEL XUEFEI 1 83.6% +18.9%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19040809 GENERATING STYLES FOR NEURAL STYLE TRANSFER IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES WU, YANNA —
19005926 TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TO PERFORM NEURAL STYLE TRANSFER IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES ROBINSON, TERRELL M —
18803378 GENERATIVE DESIGN SHAPE OPTIMIZATION WITH SINGULARITIES AND DISCONNECTION PREVENTION FOR COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING TANG, MICHAEL XUEFEI —

Hard Cases (18)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18141206 PROJECTING COST METRICS FROM AN ENGINEERING MODEL TO AN ARCHITECTURAL MODEL BOROWSKI, MICHAEL 22d
17127500 TECHNIQUES FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING FRAME GRIDS FOR STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS OF BUILDINGS HOPKINS, DAVID ANDREW 39d
19271640 TECHNIQUES FOR FORCE AND TORQUE-GUIDED ROBOTIC ASSEMBLY NELESKI, ELIZABETH ROSE —
19051066 RETARGETING CHARACTER PARAMETERS TO SIMPLIFY STACK PROCESSING FOR DEVELOPING DIVERSE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS LEE, SARAH YEO —
19016604 COMPUTER AIDED GENERATIVE TASK SCHEDULING STEWART, CRYSTOL —
18916488 TECHNIQUES FOR MOTION EDITING FOR CHARACTER ANIMATIONS CHOWDHURY, RAYEEZ R —
18784690 USER FEEDBACK MECHANISM FOR SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS YU, XINYUAN —
18750783 TECHNIQUES FOR ENABLING CONVERSATIONAL USER INTERFACES FOR SIMULATION APPLICATIONS VIA LANGUAGE MODELS MARU, MATIYAS T —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19271640 TECHNIQUES FOR FORCE AND TORQUE-GUIDED ROBOTIC ASSEMBLY NELESKI, ELIZABETH ROSE —
19096611 SHARED 3D PERSPECTIVE VIEWING OF AN ASSET IN AN EXTENDED REALITY SYSTEM SITTA, GRANT —
19040809 GENERATING STYLES FOR NEURAL STYLE TRANSFER IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES WU, YANNA —
19016604 COMPUTER AIDED GENERATIVE TASK SCHEDULING STEWART, CRYSTOL —
19005915 NEURAL STYLE TRANSFER IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES PATEL, SHIVANG I —
18916488 TECHNIQUES FOR MOTION EDITING FOR CHARACTER ANIMATIONS CHOWDHURY, RAYEEZ R —
18803378 GENERATIVE DESIGN SHAPE OPTIMIZATION WITH SINGULARITIES AND DISCONNECTION PREVENTION FOR COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING TANG, MICHAEL XUEFEI —
18348303 EFFICIENT MODELING OF ASSEMBLIES USING GENERATIVE DESIGN COTHRAN, BERNARD E —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2188 7
2186 3
3624 2
2612 2
2187 2
3658 1
2622 1
2616 1
2614 1
2615 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19271640 TECHNIQUES FOR FORCE AND TORQUE-GUIDED ROBOTIC ASSEMBLY NELESKI, ELIZABETH ROSE 3658 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 16, 2025
19096611 SHARED 3D PERSPECTIVE VIEWING OF AN ASSET IN AN EXTENDED REALITY SYSTEM SITTA, GRANT 2622 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 31, 2025
19051066 RETARGETING CHARACTER PARAMETERS TO SIMPLIFY STACK PROCESSING FOR DEVELOPING DIVERSE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS LEE, SARAH YEO 2616 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 11, 2025
19040809 GENERATING STYLES FOR NEURAL STYLE TRANSFER IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES WU, YANNA — §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 29, 2025
19016604 COMPUTER AIDED GENERATIVE TASK SCHEDULING STEWART, CRYSTOL 3624 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 10, 2025
19005926 TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TO PERFORM NEURAL STYLE TRANSFER IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES ROBINSON, TERRELL M 2614 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
19005915 NEURAL STYLE TRANSFER IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES PATEL, SHIVANG I 2615 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
18916488 TECHNIQUES FOR MOTION EDITING FOR CHARACTER ANIMATIONS CHOWDHURY, RAYEEZ R 2174 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18803378 GENERATIVE DESIGN SHAPE OPTIMIZATION WITH SINGULARITIES AND DISCONNECTION PREVENTION FOR COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING TANG, MICHAEL XUEFEI 2115 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 13, 2024
18798408 CONTEXT-ENRICHED PROMPT GENERATION FOR DOMAIN EXPLORATION ALBERTALLI, BRIAN LOUIS 2656 §103 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Aug 08, 2024
18784690 USER FEEDBACK MECHANISM FOR SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS YU, XINYUAN 2114 §101§102§103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jul 25, 2024
18781191 GEOMETRY-BASED DESIGN DATA SEARCH TOOL WANG, YI 2619 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jul 23, 2024
18765122 MULTI-USER PROMPTS FOR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS WU, MING HAN 2618 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Jul 05, 2024
18750783 TECHNIQUES FOR ENABLING CONVERSATIONAL USER INTERFACES FOR SIMULATION APPLICATIONS VIA LANGUAGE MODELS MARU, MATIYAS T 2148 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18649891 TECHNIQUES FOR USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TO GENERATE SCENES BASED UPON IMAGE TILES BROOME, SAID A 2612 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2024
18642624 TECHNIQUES FOR TRIAL-AND-ERROR LEARNING IN COMPLEX APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTS SMITH, BENJAMIN J 2172 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 22, 2024
18429258 HYBRID SURFACE MODELLING WITH SUBDIVISION SURFACES AND NURBS SURFACES SAXENA, AKASH 2188 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 31, 2024
18423153 HUMAN-CENTRIC EVALUATION OF ARCHITECTURAL SPACES ADMASU, MAHLIET TASEW 2123 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 25, 2024
18402594 RETARGETING CHARACTER ANIMATION BY TRANSFERRING SELF-AWARENESS DEMETER, HILINA K 2617 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 02, 2024
18391498 TECHNIQUES FOR SAMPLING AND REMIXING IN IMMERSIVE ENVIRONMENTS LIU, ZHENGXI 2611 §103 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Dec 20, 2023
18506971 ADAPTIVE DYNAMIC LOADING STRATEGY FOR RENDERING LARGE THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELS MINKO, DENIS VASILIY 2612 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 10, 2023
18446339 TECHNIQUES FOR USING MULTIMODAL MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TO GENERATE DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS FLYNN, ABBY J 3663 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 08, 2023
18348303 EFFICIENT MODELING OF ASSEMBLIES USING GENERATIVE DESIGN COTHRAN, BERNARD E 2188 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 06, 2023
18321628 ITERATIVE SHAPE MODIFICATION PROVIDING MAXIMUM SUSTAINABLE LOADS DURING COMPUTER AIDED GENERATIVE DESIGN GIRI, PURSOTTAM 2186 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2023
18141206 PROJECTING COST METRICS FROM AN ENGINEERING MODEL TO AN ARCHITECTURAL MODEL BOROWSKI, MICHAEL 3624 §101 Final Rejection 22d Pending Apr 28, 2023
18167036 MULTI-SCALE GENERATIVE DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION WATHEN, BRIAN W 2151 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 09, 2023
18167032 AGENT-BASED OPTIMIZATION OF MULTI-BUILDING SITE LAYOUTS HUYNH, KHANG THIEN GIA 2186 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2023
18077948 GENERATIVE DESIGN SHAPE OPTIMIZATION WITH SIZE LIMITED FATIGUE DAMAGE FOR COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING WHITE, JAY MICHAEL 2188 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 08, 2022
17990301 DUAL MODEL SHAPE SYNTHESIS KIM, EUNHEE 2188 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 18, 2022
17960036 MATERIAL SPECIFICATION TO FACILITATE PART CREATION IN COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE COTHRAN, BERNARD E 2188 §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2022
17832123 VOXEL-BASED APPROACH FOR DESIGN MODELS HAO, YI 2187 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 03, 2022
17713724 LIBRARY-BASED CONNECTIONS DESIGN AUTOMATION LEATHERS, EMILY GORMAN 2187 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 05, 2022
17671286 COMPUTER-BASED TECHNIQUES FOR VISUALLY NARRATING RECORDED MEETING CONTENT CASTILLO-TORRES, KEISHA Y 2659 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2022
17523749 TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING VISUALIZATIONS OF GEOMETRIC STYLE GRADIENTS DRAPEAU, SIMEON PAUL 2188 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 10, 2021
17344710 GENERATIVE DESIGN TECHNIQUES FOR SOFT ROBOT MANIPULATORS DEBNATH, NUPUR 2186 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 10, 2021
17127500 TECHNIQUES FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING FRAME GRIDS FOR STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS OF BUILDINGS HOPKINS, DAVID ANDREW 2188 §101 Final Rejection 39d Pending Dec 18, 2020

Managing Autodesk Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Autodesk Inc. have?

Autodesk Inc. has 36 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 24 art units and 35 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Autodesk Inc. applications?

Bernard E Cothran has the most, with 2 of Autodesk Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Autodesk Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month