Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Cariad SE

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

15 pending office actions • 11 art units • 15 examiners • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 25 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cariad SE maintains a significant prosecution presence in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 15 pending office actions. These matters are distributed across 15 distinct examiners, creating a highly decentralized workload where no single examiner holds a plurality of the pending matters. This distribution requires a highly individualized approach to each case.

The portfolio's reach extends across 11 distinct art units, which suggests a broad technical scope within its primary technology area. This high number of art units indicates that the company must interface with many different supervisory structures and examination styles at the patent office. Managing the workload across 11 distinct art units suggests that the company's innovations span a wide variety of technical sub-sectors.

GOEBEL, EMMA ROSE is the busiest examiner for the company, though she is only responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This reinforces the observation of extreme distribution, as the busiest examiner handles only 1 of the total pending office actions. For practitioners, this means that prosecution strategies must be tailored to many different individuals rather than relying on trends established with a few key examiners. This level of dispersion across the portfolio is a defining characteristic of the current strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (40%)
7
Medium (47%)
2
Easy (13%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other5 (33%)
§103 only7 (47%)
§112 only2 (13%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (7%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
13% of docket
3
Communications
20% of docket
2
Semiconductors
13% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
2
Business / Other
13% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GOEBEL, EMMA ROSE 1 52.2% +33.5%
WU, YANNA 1 80.9% +34.4%
SLOMS, NICHOLAS 1 68.5% +10.5%
PALL, CHARLES J 1 54.4% +17.9%
MOLINA, NIKKI MARIE M 1 78.4% +4.1%
COBB, MICHAEL J 1 76.7% +36.2%
VORCE, AMELIA J.I. 1 73.5% +20.6%
GOOD, KENNETH W 1 73.5% +19.0%
BOURZIK, BRAHIM 1 63.8% +44.0%
CLARK, CHRISTOPHER JAY 1 75.8% +22.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18810251 METHOD FOR AN AUTOMATED GENERATION OF SYNTHETIC SCENES WU, YANNA —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17922325 METHOD, SYSTEM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DETERMINING THE POSE OF A MOBILE UNIT DARDANO, STEFANO ANTHONY 164d overdue
18184935 PARKING ASSISTANCE METHOD FOR A DRIVE WITH A MOTOR VEHICLE, PARKING ASSISTANCE DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, MOBILE PORTABLE TERMINAL, SERVER DEVICE AND MOTOR VEHICLE LEITE, PAULO ROBERTO GONZ 5d overdue
18292314 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SPEED OF TRAFFIC IN A ROUTE SECTION, DETECTION DEVICE, VEHICLE AND CENTRAL COMPUTER GOOD, KENNETH W 2d overdue
18086192 INTELLIGENT SPEED CHECK MILLER, PRESTON JAY 22d
18936575 METHOD FOR DIMENSION REDUCTION GOEBEL, EMMA ROSE —
18662291 METHOD FOR DETECTING AT LEAST ONE OBSTACLE IN AN AUTOMATED AND/OR AT LEAST SEMI-AUTONOMOUS DRIVING SYSTEM MOLINA, NIKKI MARIE M —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18587822 METHOD FOR CREATING AN INDIVIDUAL USER PROFILE IN THE EVENT OF AN OCCURRENCE OF MOTION SICKNESS OF A USER, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND SUPPORT SYSTEM VORCE, AMELIA J.I. 93d overdue
18292314 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SPEED OF TRAFFIC IN A ROUTE SECTION, DETECTION DEVICE, VEHICLE AND CENTRAL COMPUTER GOOD, KENNETH W 2d overdue
18636920 METHOD FOR GENERATING AN ENVIRONMENT REPRESENTATION COBB, MICHAEL J 27d
18526919 METHOD AND CONTROL CIRCUIT FOR OPERATING A SWITCHING ELEMENT OF AN ELECTRICAL COMPONENT IN ORDER TO AVOID OVERHEATING BY ELECTRICAL DISSIPATED HEAT, AND AN ELECTRICAL COMPONENT HAVING THE CONTROL CIRCUIT CLARK, CHRISTOPHER JAY 35d
18936575 METHOD FOR DIMENSION REDUCTION GOEBEL, EMMA ROSE —
18810251 METHOD FOR AN AUTOMATED GENERATION OF SYNTHETIC SCENES WU, YANNA —
18834990 METHOD AND DATA BUS HEAD NODE FOR DETERMINING A PROPAGATION DELAY BETWEEN THE HEAD NODE ON ONE SIDE AND A PLURALITY OF OTHER BUS NODES OF THE DATA BUS ON THE OTHER SIDE, CORRESPONDING DATA BUS SYSTEM AND VEHICLE COMPRISING THE DATA BUS SYSTEM SLOMS, NICHOLAS —
18747311 METHOD FOR PROVIDING A DISPLAY OF A TRAFFIC SITUATION PALL, CHARLES J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2615 2
3663 2
3662 1
3666 1
3648 1
2191 1
2838 1
2872 1
2199 1
3661 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18936575 METHOD FOR DIMENSION REDUCTION GOEBEL, EMMA ROSE — §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 04, 2024
18810251 METHOD FOR AN AUTOMATED GENERATION OF SYNTHETIC SCENES WU, YANNA 2615 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 20, 2024
18834990 METHOD AND DATA BUS HEAD NODE FOR DETERMINING A PROPAGATION DELAY BETWEEN THE HEAD NODE ON ONE SIDE AND A PLURALITY OF OTHER BUS NODES OF THE DATA BUS ON THE OTHER SIDE, CORRESPONDING DATA BUS SYSTEM AND VEHICLE COMPRISING THE DATA BUS SYSTEM SLOMS, NICHOLAS — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2024
18747311 METHOD FOR PROVIDING A DISPLAY OF A TRAFFIC SITUATION PALL, CHARLES J 3663 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 18, 2024
18662291 METHOD FOR DETECTING AT LEAST ONE OBSTACLE IN AN AUTOMATED AND/OR AT LEAST SEMI-AUTONOMOUS DRIVING SYSTEM MOLINA, NIKKI MARIE M 3662 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 13, 2024
18636920 METHOD FOR GENERATING AN ENVIRONMENT REPRESENTATION COBB, MICHAEL J 2615 §112 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Apr 16, 2024
18587822 METHOD FOR CREATING AN INDIVIDUAL USER PROFILE IN THE EVENT OF AN OCCURRENCE OF MOTION SICKNESS OF A USER, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND SUPPORT SYSTEM VORCE, AMELIA J.I. 3666 §112 Non-Final OA 93d overdue Pending Feb 26, 2024
18292314 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SPEED OF TRAFFIC IN A ROUTE SECTION, DETECTION DEVICE, VEHICLE AND CENTRAL COMPUTER GOOD, KENNETH W 3648 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Jan 25, 2024
18575767 ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT, VEHICLE WITH ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT, AND METHOD FOR UPDATING ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT BOURZIK, BRAHIM 2191 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 29, 2023
18526919 METHOD AND CONTROL CIRCUIT FOR OPERATING A SWITCHING ELEMENT OF AN ELECTRICAL COMPONENT IN ORDER TO AVOID OVERHEATING BY ELECTRICAL DISSIPATED HEAT, AND AN ELECTRICAL COMPONENT HAVING THE CONTROL CIRCUIT CLARK, CHRISTOPHER JAY 2838 §103 Final Rejection 35d Pending Dec 01, 2023
18457231 METHOD FOR AUTOMATED ADAPTING OF AN ADJUSTMENT OF A MIRROR SURFACE OF AT LEAST ONE OUTSIDE MIRROR OF A MOTOR VEHICLE AND MOTOR VEHICLE HAVING AN OUTSIDE MIRROR SUMLAR, JOURNEY F 2872 §103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Aug 28, 2023
18311132 METHOD AND MOTOR VEHICLE CONTROLLER FOR OPERATING A CONTAINER VIRTUALIZATION WITH LOGGING FUNCTION, AS WELL AS COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM AQUINO, WYNUEL S 2199 §103 Final Rejection 91d overdue Pending May 02, 2023
18184935 PARKING ASSISTANCE METHOD FOR A DRIVE WITH A MOTOR VEHICLE, PARKING ASSISTANCE DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, MOBILE PORTABLE TERMINAL, SERVER DEVICE AND MOTOR VEHICLE LEITE, PAULO ROBERTO GONZ 3663 §101§103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Mar 16, 2023
18086192 INTELLIGENT SPEED CHECK MILLER, PRESTON JAY 3661 §101§103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Dec 21, 2022
17922325 METHOD, SYSTEM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DETERMINING THE POSE OF A MOBILE UNIT DARDANO, STEFANO ANTHONY 2663 §102§103 Final Rejection 164d overdue Pending Oct 28, 2022

Managing Cariad SE's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month