Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (50%) |
| §103 only | 2 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KANG, TIMOTHY J | 1 | 46.1% | +25.0% |
| VELEZ, ROBERTO | 1 | 66.9% | +21.0% |
| GARG, YOGESH C | 1 | 61.6% | +33.4% |
| MALHOTRA, SANJEEV | 1 | 66.1% | +30.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18679883 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A DEAL STRUCTURE | KANG, TIMOTHY J | 10d overdue |
| 18052394 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED TRANSACTION PLATFORMS | MALHOTRA, SANJEEV | 9d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18621514 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE RECOMMENDATION | GARG, YOGESH C | 84d overdue |
| 18622296 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR TESTING OF A RECHARGEABLE BATTERY | VELEZ, ROBERTO | 22d overdue |
| 18679883 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A DEAL STRUCTURE | KANG, TIMOTHY J | 10d overdue |
| 18052394 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED TRANSACTION PLATFORMS | MALHOTRA, SANJEEV | 9d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3689 | 1 |
| 2858 | 1 |
| 3688 | 1 |
| 3691 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18679883 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A DEAL STRUCTURE | KANG, TIMOTHY J | 3689 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 10d overdue | Pending | May 31, 2024 |
| 18622296 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR TESTING OF A RECHARGEABLE BATTERY | VELEZ, ROBERTO | 2858 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 22d overdue | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 18621514 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE RECOMMENDATION | GARG, YOGESH C | 3688 | §103 | Final Rejection | 84d overdue | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 18052394 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED TRANSACTION PLATFORMS | MALHOTRA, SANJEEV | 3691 | §101 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Nov 03, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial