Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Dy Auto Corporation

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Dy Auto Corporation currently has 5 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 5 pending matters are distributed among 5 distinct examiners. The portfolio's active applications are spread across 3 distinct art units, reflecting a diverse range of mechanical or medical subject matter within the company's primary technical focus.

The busiest examiner for the company is KARLS, SHAY LYNN, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because there are 5 pending office actions and 5 distinct examiners, the workload is evenly split, with each examiner handling exactly one pending action. This distribution across 3 distinct art units suggests that no single examiner currently dominates the prosecution pipeline for the entity.

Practitioners should note that the engagement with 5 distinct examiners requires a flexible prosecution strategy. While the workload is distributed, the concentration within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area ensures that the 3 distinct art units will be the primary focus for future filings. Monitoring the specific trends in these units will be essential for maintaining consistency across the 5 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
§102 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KARLS, SHAY LYNN 1 68.9% +26.8%
HARRINGTON, ALYSON JOAN 1 74.5% +60.9%
SCHWARTZ, KEVIN EDWARD 1 51.3% +40.0%
COLEMAN, RYAN L 1 56.0% +59.7%
CERNOCH, STEVEN MICHAEL 1 53.1% +41.2%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18531415 NOZZLE SYSTEM HARRINGTON, ALYSON JOAN —
18373015 NOZZLE SYSTEM SCHWARTZ, KEVIN EDWARD —
17889825 SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTING WASHER LIQUID CERNOCH, STEVEN MICHAEL —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18141607 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DISCHARGE PRESSURE OF FLUID FOR WASHING A SENSOR COLEMAN, RYAN L 5d
18968591 WIPER BLADE DEVICE INCLUDING IMPROVED STRUCTURE FOR PREVENTING SEPARATION OF SPOILER KARLS, SHAY LYNN —
18531415 NOZZLE SYSTEM HARRINGTON, ALYSON JOAN —
18373015 NOZZLE SYSTEM SCHWARTZ, KEVIN EDWARD —
17889825 SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTING WASHER LIQUID CERNOCH, STEVEN MICHAEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3752 2
3741 1
1714 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18968591 WIPER BLADE DEVICE INCLUDING IMPROVED STRUCTURE FOR PREVENTING SEPARATION OF SPOILER KARLS, SHAY LYNN — §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 04, 2024
18531415 NOZZLE SYSTEM HARRINGTON, ALYSON JOAN 3741 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2023
18373015 NOZZLE SYSTEM SCHWARTZ, KEVIN EDWARD 3752 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 26, 2023
18141607 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DISCHARGE PRESSURE OF FLUID FOR WASHING A SENSOR COLEMAN, RYAN L 1714 §103 Final Rejection 5d Pending May 01, 2023
17889825 SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTING WASHER LIQUID CERNOCH, STEVEN MICHAEL 3752 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 17, 2022

Managing Dy Auto Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month