Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Etched AI Inc. currently has 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units, which suggests that the company's patent applications cover different functional aspects of computing systems. The involvement of 2 distinct examiners indicates that the prosecution is being handled by multiple reviewers simultaneously.
COYER, RYAN D is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. This means that the 2 pending office actions are split among the examiners, with each managing a case. The presence of 2 distinct art units implies that the technology may span different classifications within the Computing & Software field.
Managing 2 distinct examiners requires a coordinated approach to ensure consistency in the company's patent claims. Since the busiest examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action, the workload remains decentralized across the office. This distribution allows the company to advance its intellectual property goals in different technical sectors at the same time.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COYER, RYAN D | 1 | 79.2% | +19.9% |
| LEE, CHUN KUAN | 1 | 68.4% | +3.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18384023 | MODEL-SPECIFIC ASIC COMPILATION USING FUSED KERNEL REPLACEMENT | COYER, RYAN D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2191 | 1 |
| 2181 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18384023 | MODEL-SPECIFIC ASIC COMPILATION USING FUSED KERNEL REPLACEMENT | COYER, RYAN D | 2191 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 26, 2023 |
| 18195769 | MULTI-CHIP SYSTOLIC ARRAYS | LEE, CHUN KUAN | 2181 | §103 | Final Rejection | 76d | Pending | May 10, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial