Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Figma Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications

13 pending office actions • 11 art units • 13 examiners • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Figma Inc. currently has 14 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are distributed among 14 distinct examiners and 11 distinct art units. The fact that there are 14 distinct examiners for 14 pending office actions means that every pending matter is being handled by a different person.

FLORES, ROBERTO W is the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. This reflects the broader trend where each of the 14 pending office actions is assigned to a unique examiner. With 11 distinct art units involved, the portfolio covers a range of software and computing technologies. FLORES, ROBERTO W handles 1 of these cases.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (23%)
9
Medium (69%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§101 + other2 (15%)
§103 only7 (54%)
§102 only2 (15%)
Double-patenting only1 (8%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
9
Information Tech
69% of docket
3
Communications
23% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
8% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FLORES, ROBERTO W 1 49.8% +14.0%
ADAMS, CHARLES D 1 44.9% +43.4%
PHAM, LINH K 1 80.9% +28.8%
MCLEAN, NEIL R 1 79.9% +10.4%
ULRICH, NICHOLAS S 1 69.3% +8.0%
PARCHER, DANIEL W 1 60.5% +59.3%
NAHRA, SELENA SABAH 1 76.9% +54.5%
NGUYEN, MONGBAO 1 85.9% +41.8%
HEBERT, THEODORE E 1 74.2% +14.2%
SHENG, XIN 1 73.2% +16.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18991170 COMMENTING FEATURE FOR GRAPHIC DESIGN SYSTEMS PHAM, LINH K —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19063196 FRAGMENT-BASED DESIGN SEARCH ADAMS, CHARLES D 34d
18750594 AUTOCOMPLETE FEATURE FOR CODE EDITOR NGUYEN, MONGBAO —
17726251 BRANCHING AND MERGING IN A DESIGN INTERFACE DO, CHAT C —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19063196 FRAGMENT-BASED DESIGN SEARCH ADAMS, CHARLES D 34d
19337734 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING EVENTS IN BROWSER-BASED APPLICATIONS FLORES, ROBERTO W —
18991170 COMMENTING FEATURE FOR GRAPHIC DESIGN SYSTEMS PHAM, LINH K —
18893061 INTERACTIVE VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF SEMANTICALLY RELATED EXTRACTED DATA MCLEAN, NEIL R —
18765145 CURSOR TEXT REPRESENTATION OF USER IN A COLLABORATIVE PLATFORM PARCHER, DANIEL W —
18750279 UNIFIED REST API FOR GRAPHIC DESIGN SYSTEM NAHRA, SELENA SABAH —
18750594 AUTOCOMPLETE FEATURE FOR CODE EDITOR NGUYEN, MONGBAO —
18750948 DYNAMICALLY GENERATING CODE FOR IMPLEMENTING A DESIGN COMPONENT IN A PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT HEBERT, THEODORE E —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2174 2
2192 2
2621 1
2165 1
2681 1
2179 1
2199 1
2619 1
4100 1
2193 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19337734 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING EVENTS IN BROWSER-BASED APPLICATIONS FLORES, ROBERTO W 2621 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2025
19063196 FRAGMENT-BASED DESIGN SEARCH ADAMS, CHARLES D 2165 §101§103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Feb 25, 2025
18991170 COMMENTING FEATURE FOR GRAPHIC DESIGN SYSTEMS PHAM, LINH K 2174 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18893061 INTERACTIVE VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF SEMANTICALLY RELATED EXTRACTED DATA MCLEAN, NEIL R 2681 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2024
18819244 NATIVE INTERACTION LAYER FOR A COLLABORATION PLATFORM ULRICH, NICHOLAS S 2179 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 29, 2024
18765145 CURSOR TEXT REPRESENTATION OF USER IN A COLLABORATIVE PLATFORM PARCHER, DANIEL W 2174 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 05, 2024
18750279 UNIFIED REST API FOR GRAPHIC DESIGN SYSTEM NAHRA, SELENA SABAH 2192 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18750594 AUTOCOMPLETE FEATURE FOR CODE EDITOR NGUYEN, MONGBAO 2192 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18750948 DYNAMICALLY GENERATING CODE FOR IMPLEMENTING A DESIGN COMPONENT IN A PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT HEBERT, THEODORE E 2199 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18749359 GRAPHIC DESIGN SYSTEM UTILIZING VARIABLE DATA STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-STATE DESIGN ELEMENTS SHENG, XIN 2619 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2024
18748965 GRAPHIC DESIGN CODE GENERATION PLUGIN SYSTEM NOOR, TUBBA 4100 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2024
17726251 BRANCHING AND MERGING IN A DESIGN INTERFACE DO, CHAT C 2193 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 21, 2022
17530413 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTIVELY IMPLEMENTING LAYOUT CONFIGURATIONS AMONGST OBJECT GROUPINGS OF A DESIGN UNDER EDIT KEATON, SHERROD L 2148 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2021

Managing Figma Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Figma Inc. have?

Figma Inc. has 13 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 11 art units and 13 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Figma Inc. applications?

Roberto W Flores has the most, with 1 of Figma Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Figma Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month