Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
7 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 29 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (29%) |
| §102 only | 1 (14%) |
| §112 only | 3 (43%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (14%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WU, JAMES | 2 | 70.2% | +34.8% |
| WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S | 1 | 69.9% | +19.6% |
| SASSERATH, ELISA MARIE | 1 | 90.9% | +10.7% |
| ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK | 1 | 63.5% | +24.5% |
| BROWN, EMILY GAIL | 1 | 74.0% | +18.1% |
| MCMAHON, MATTHEW R | 1 | 57.4% | +52.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18776809 | QUICK-MOUNT SLIDE RAIL | SASSERATH, ELISA MARIE | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18775552 | SLIDE RAIL LOCKING DEVICE | ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK | 89d overdue |
| 18585816 | ELECTRIC CARD RETAINING DEVICE | WU, JAMES | 46d overdue |
| 18659214 | ELECTRONIC CARD RETAINING DEVICE | WU, JAMES | 45d overdue |
| 18585254 | LATCH DEVICE | BROWN, EMILY GAIL | 16d overdue |
| 18932892 | SAFETY SLIDE RAIL DEVICE | WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S | 3d overdue |
| 18776809 | QUICK-MOUNT SLIDE RAIL | SASSERATH, ELISA MARIE | 29d |
| 18428543 | HINGE WITH MOVABLE ROTATING AXLE | MCMAHON, MATTHEW R | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2841 | 3 |
| 3637 | 2 |
| 3675 | 1 |
| 3678 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18932892 | SAFETY SLIDE RAIL DEVICE | WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S | 3637 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 3d overdue | Pending | Oct 31, 2024 |
| 18776809 | QUICK-MOUNT SLIDE RAIL | SASSERATH, ELISA MARIE | 2841 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 29d | Pending | Jul 18, 2024 |
| 18775552 | SLIDE RAIL LOCKING DEVICE | ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK | 3637 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 89d overdue | Pending | Jul 17, 2024 |
| 18659214 | ELECTRONIC CARD RETAINING DEVICE | WU, JAMES | 2841 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 45d overdue | Pending | May 09, 2024 |
| 18585254 | LATCH DEVICE | BROWN, EMILY GAIL | 3675 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 16d overdue | Pending | Feb 23, 2024 |
| 18585816 | ELECTRIC CARD RETAINING DEVICE | WU, JAMES | 2841 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 46d overdue | Pending | Feb 23, 2024 |
| 18428543 | HINGE WITH MOVABLE ROTATING AXLE | MCMAHON, MATTHEW R | 3678 | Other | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Jan 31, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial