Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Fositek Corporation

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 23 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Fositek Corporation is currently managing 4 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed among 4 distinct examiners, meaning that every active application is being reviewed by a different person. This one-to-one ratio between pending actions and examiners indicates a decentralized prosecution environment for the company.

The portfolio spans 3 distinct art units, which suggests that the company's mechanical and transportation technologies are classified into several specific technical categories. HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE is the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 1 pending office action. With 4 distinct examiners each managing 1 pending office action, the company's prosecution strategy must account for 4 different individual perspectives. The 4 pending office actions across 3 distinct art units highlight a diverse set of technical challenges that the company must address to advance its current applications in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE 1 70.5% +21.9%
CHAUDRY, ATIF H 1 70.7% +16.5%
WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 1 70.2% +18.8%
BROWN, EMILY GAIL 1 74.5% +17.7%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18585254 LATCH DEVICE BROWN, EMILY GAIL 16d overdue
18932892 SAFETY SLIDE RAIL DEVICE WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 3d overdue
19009678 SLIDE RAIL DEVICE HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE —
19008181 QUICK CONNECT FEMALE COUPLER STRUCTURE CHAUDRY, ATIF H —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18585254 LATCH DEVICE BROWN, EMILY GAIL 16d overdue
18932892 SAFETY SLIDE RAIL DEVICE WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 3d overdue
19009678 SLIDE RAIL DEVICE HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE —
19008181 QUICK CONNECT FEMALE COUPLER STRUCTURE CHAUDRY, ATIF H —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3637 2
3753 1
3675 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19009678 SLIDE RAIL DEVICE HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE 3637 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 03, 2025
19008181 QUICK CONNECT FEMALE COUPLER STRUCTURE CHAUDRY, ATIF H 3753 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 02, 2025
18932892 SAFETY SLIDE RAIL DEVICE WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 3637 §102§103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Oct 31, 2024
18585254 LATCH DEVICE BROWN, EMILY GAIL 3675 §103§112 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending Feb 23, 2024

Managing Fositek Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month