Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

GDM Holding LLC

19 pending office actions • 11 art units • 19 examiners • 0 of 19 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 56 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

19
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (47%)
9
Medium (47%)
1
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (16%)
§101 + other3 (16%)
§103 only7 (37%)
Double-patenting only1 (5%)
Double-patenting + other2 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (16%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
9
Information Tech
47% of docket
1
Communications
5% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
21% of docket
5
Business / Other
26% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

190 h
Manual time on pending OAs
38 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
66 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CLOTHIER, MATTHEW MORRIS 1 83.3% +20.0%
KUDDUS, DANIEL A 1 71.3% +43.3%
HASAN, SYED HAROON 1 81.5% +15.6%
GONZALES, VINCENT 1 78.4% +11.3%
JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE 1 80.8% +27.0%
KATZ, DYLAN MICHAEL 1 86.2% +21.4%
ALCANTARA-RAMOS, EMILIO 1 50.0% +100.0%
CASS, JEAN PAUL 1 72.9% +25.3%
CHANNAVAJJALA, SRIRAMA T 1 74.4% +32.9%
RAMESH, TIRUMALE K 1 27.7% +24.9%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19421916 VIDEO GENERATION NEURAL NETWORKS WITH CAMERA AND SUBJECT MOTION INPUTS CLOTHIER, MATTHEW MORRIS
19200502 DATA-DRIVEN ROBOT CONTROL JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18102053 USING EMBEDDINGS, GENERATED USING ROBOT ACTION MODELS, IN CONTROLLING ROBOT TO PERFORM ROBOTIC TASK BLUST, JASON W 3d overdue
17337376 STABLE AND EFFICIENT TRAINING OF ADVERSARIAL MODELS BY AN ITERATED UPDATE OPERATION OF SECOND ORDER OR HIGHER CHUANG, SU-TING 41d
19366240 Real-Time Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence Agent HASAN, SYED HAROON
19173425 TRANSFORMER DIFFUSION FOR ROBOTIC TASK LEARNING KATZ, DYLAN MICHAEL
19095710 GENERAL-PURPOSE SYSTOLIC ARRAY ALCANTARA-RAMOS, EMILIO
19112153 ROBOT CONTROL BASED ON NATURAL LANGUAGE (NL) INPUT AND BASED ON DESCRIPTOR(S) OF OBJECT(S) THAT ARE PRESENT IN ENVIRONMENT WITH ROBOT AND RELEVANT TO THE NL INPUT CASS, JEAN PAUL
19074205 VERIFYING QUERIES USING NEURAL NETWORKS CHANNAVAJJALA, SRIRAMA T
19070417 TRAINING NEURAL NETWORKS USING WEIGHT NORM REGULARIZATIONS RAMESH, TIRUMALE K

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19421916 VIDEO GENERATION NEURAL NETWORKS WITH CAMERA AND SUBJECT MOTION INPUTS CLOTHIER, MATTHEW MORRIS
19417113 GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS WITH INVISIBLE TOKENS KUDDUS, DANIEL A
19366240 Real-Time Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence Agent HASAN, SYED HAROON
19359142 ATTENTION NEURAL NETWORKS WITH PARTIAL POSITION ENCODING GONZALES, VINCENT
19200502 DATA-DRIVEN ROBOT CONTROL JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE
19173425 TRANSFORMER DIFFUSION FOR ROBOTIC TASK LEARNING KATZ, DYLAN MICHAEL
19095710 GENERAL-PURPOSE SYSTOLIC ARRAY ALCANTARA-RAMOS, EMILIO
19112153 ROBOT CONTROL BASED ON NATURAL LANGUAGE (NL) INPUT AND BASED ON DESCRIPTOR(S) OF OBJECT(S) THAT ARE PRESENT IN ENVIRONMENT WITH ROBOT AND RELEVANT TO THE NL INPUT CASS, JEAN PAUL

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2154 3
2146 2
2614 1
2124 1
3657 1
3666 1
2121 1
3658 1
3656 1
2132 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19421916 VIDEO GENERATION NEURAL NETWORKS WITH CAMERA AND SUBJECT MOTION INPUTS CLOTHIER, MATTHEW MORRIS 2614 §103 Final Rejection Pending Dec 16, 2025
19417113 GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS WITH INVISIBLE TOKENS KUDDUS, DANIEL A 2154 §103 Final Rejection Pending Dec 11, 2025
19366240 Real-Time Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence Agent HASAN, SYED HAROON 2154 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection Pending Oct 22, 2025
19359142 ATTENTION NEURAL NETWORKS WITH PARTIAL POSITION ENCODING GONZALES, VINCENT 2124 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 15, 2025
19200502 DATA-DRIVEN ROBOT CONTROL JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE 3657 §102DP Non-Final OA Pending May 06, 2025
19173425 TRANSFORMER DIFFUSION FOR ROBOTIC TASK LEARNING KATZ, DYLAN MICHAEL §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 08, 2025
19095710 GENERAL-PURPOSE SYSTOLIC ARRAY ALCANTARA-RAMOS, EMILIO §103§112Other Non-Final OA Pending Mar 31, 2025
19112153 ROBOT CONTROL BASED ON NATURAL LANGUAGE (NL) INPUT AND BASED ON DESCRIPTOR(S) OF OBJECT(S) THAT ARE PRESENT IN ENVIRONMENT WITH ROBOT AND RELEVANT TO THE NL INPUT CASS, JEAN PAUL 3666 §101 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 14, 2025
19074205 VERIFYING QUERIES USING NEURAL NETWORKS CHANNAVAJJALA, SRIRAMA T 2154 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 07, 2025
19070417 TRAINING NEURAL NETWORKS USING WEIGHT NORM REGULARIZATIONS RAMESH, TIRUMALE K 2121 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 04, 2025
19059132 GENERATING IMAGES USING NEURAL NETWORKS SALTARELLI, DOMINIC D DP Non-Final OA Pending Feb 20, 2025
18918590 MACHINE LEARNING METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ROBOTIC MANIPULATION AND THAT UTILIZE MULTI-TASK DOMAIN ADAPTATION JOS, BASIL T 3658 §101 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 17, 2024
18899829 GENERATING A MODEL FOR AN OBJECT ENCOUNTERED BY A ROBOT GOEBEL, EMMA ROSE §103§112DP Non-Final OA Pending Sep 27, 2024
18462628 TRANSISTOR-LEVEL SYNTHESIS MILLER, DANIEL E §103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 07, 2023
18176937 Robot Collaboration via Cloud Server CAIN, AARON G 3656 §103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Mar 01, 2023
18102053 USING EMBEDDINGS, GENERATED USING ROBOT ACTION MODELS, IN CONTROLLING ROBOT TO PERFORM ROBOTIC TASK BLUST, JASON W 2132 §102§103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Jan 26, 2023
18008838 TRAINING AN ACTION SELECTION SYSTEM USING RELATIVE ENTROPY Q-LEARNING YI, HYUNGJUN B 2146 §101§103 Final Rejection Pending Dec 07, 2022
17918365 LEARNING OPTIONS FOR ACTION SELECTION WITH META-GRADIENTS IN MULTI-TASK REINFORCEMENT LEARNING DAY, ROBERT N 2122 §103 Final Rejection 103d overdue Pending Oct 12, 2022
17337376 STABLE AND EFFICIENT TRAINING OF ADVERSARIAL MODELS BY AN ITERATED UPDATE OPERATION OF SECOND ORDER OR HIGHER CHUANG, SU-TING 2146 §101 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Jun 02, 2021

Managing GDM Holding LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month