Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Examiner: BLUST, JASON W

Tech Center 2100 • Art Units: 2132 2137

This examiner grants 79% of resolved cases

Analysis

Jason W. Blust is an examiner in Tech Center 2100 and Art Unit 2132. He has 290 resolved cases, providing a solid foundation for analyzing his examination patterns. His work in Tech Center 2100 involves computer architecture and software technologies. The 290 resolved cases offer a reliable statistical basis for evaluating his performance.

The examiner has an allowance rate of 79.3 percent. This is a high rate, suggesting a very favorable environment for applicants. The median days to allowance is 857, which is an efficient timeline for the complex technologies in this tech center. This combination of a 79.3 percent allowance rate and an 857 median days to allowance makes his docket very productive for practitioners seeking timely grants.

The interview lift is 14.9 percent. This is a positive lift, showing that interviews are beneficial even with a high baseline allowance rate of 79.3 percent. While many cases are allowed through the standard written process, the 14.9 percent lift can still provide a meaningful advantage in resolving final issues. Practitioners should consider interviews as a strategic tool to maintain the efficiency of the prosecution and secure a positive outcome. The 857 median days to allowance is a key performance indicator for this docket.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

79.3%
Allow Rate
+24.3% vs TC avg
311
Total Applications
+14.9%
Interview Lift
857
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 290 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

7.0%
§101 Eligibility
22.0%
§102 Novelty
49.3%
§103 Obviousness
13.3%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18988551 STORAGE DEVICE PERFORMING PRE-PROGRAM OPERATION AND PROGRAM METHOD THEREOF Final Rejection SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
19078854 Data Operation Method and Apparatus, and Device Final Rejection Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
18967151 PRIORITIZING COMMANDS IN A COMMAND QUEUE FOR A SYSTEM MEMORY MANAGEMENT UNIT Final Rejection QUALCOMM Incorporated
19307990 APPLICATION-AWARE ADAPTIVE SHARDING FOR DATA BACKUP Non-Final OA Rubrik, Inc.
18585982 MEMORY CONTROLLER AND MEMORY SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME Non-Final OA SK hynix Inc.
18801675 VIRTUAL MACHINE CHANGE BLOCK TRACKING Final Rejection Commvault Systems, Inc.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month