Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Haldor Topsøe A/S

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

9 pending office actions • 5 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Haldor Topsøe A/S manages a significant portfolio with 10 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 10 distinct examiners, meaning that every active matter is being reviewed by a different official. This complete decentralization of the workload across 10 distinct examiners ensures a wide variety of perspectives on the company's chemical innovations. The portfolio's technical reach is also broad, as it spans 6 distinct art units within the patent office. This distribution across 6 distinct art units suggests that the company's research covers multiple specialized sub-fields of chemistry and materials science. Practitioners must tailor their prosecution strategies to the specific standards of each of the 6 distinct art units.

The busiest examiner, LI, JUN, is currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Because there are 10 distinct examiners for the 10 total pending actions, no single official has a disproportionate influence on the portfolio's progress. For practitioners, the presence of 6 distinct art units indicates that prosecution strategies must be highly adaptable. The 10 pending office actions represent a substantial and technically diverse effort to secure intellectual property. This arrangement requires managing 10 separate examiner interactions across 6 different technical divisions to resolve the 10 pending office actions. The decentralized nature of the portfolio provides the company with a broad range of independent reviews for its chemical innovations.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (22%)
7
Medium (78%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only6 (67%)
Double-patenting + other1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (22%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

8
Life Sciences
89% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
11% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WARTALOWICZ, PAUL A 1 64.4% +18.8%
PEREZ, JELITZA M 1 75.2% +29.7%
FORREST, MICHAEL 1 59.5% +13.8%
BAHTA, MEDHANIT W 1 80.6% +28.2%
KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE 1 20.8% +95.0%
LEUNG, JENNIFER A 1 61.9% +12.5%
AKRAM, IMRAN 1 64.7% +43.0%
PARENT, ALEXANDER RENE 1 55.6% +15.6%
WITHERSPOON, SIKARL A 1 86.2% -20.1%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17616899 Biogas upgrading to methanol BAHTA, MEDHANIT W 103d overdue
16743239 THERMOLYTIC FRAGMENTATION OF SUGARS WITHERSPOON, SIKARL A —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17421414 Chemical plant with a reforming section and a process for producing a chemical product KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE 107d overdue
17058970 EXPANDER FOR SOEC APPLICATIONS PARENT, ALEXANDER RENE 70d
18245730 CONVERSION OF CO2 AND H2 TO SYNFUELS PEREZ, JELITZA M —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17421414 Chemical plant with a reforming section and a process for producing a chemical product KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE 107d overdue
17616899 Biogas upgrading to methanol BAHTA, MEDHANIT W 103d overdue
18006184 OFF-GAS UTILIZATION IN ELECTRICALLY HEATED REFORMING PLANT FORREST, MICHAEL 32d overdue
17274654 CARBON RECYCLING IN STEAM REFORMING PROCESS AKRAM, IMRAN 12d
17058970 EXPANDER FOR SOEC APPLICATIONS PARENT, ALEXANDER RENE 70d
18761285 SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR SYNTHESIS GAS PRODUCTION WARTALOWICZ, PAUL A —
18245730 CONVERSION OF CO2 AND H2 TO SYNFUELS PEREZ, JELITZA M —
17421449 PARALLEL REFORMING IN CHEMICAL PLANT LEUNG, JENNIFER A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1774 3
1692 2
1738 1
1725 1
1795 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18761285 SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR SYNTHESIS GAS PRODUCTION WARTALOWICZ, PAUL A — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 01, 2024
18245730 CONVERSION OF CO2 AND H2 TO SYNFUELS PEREZ, JELITZA M 1774 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 17, 2023
18006184 OFF-GAS UTILIZATION IN ELECTRICALLY HEATED REFORMING PLANT FORREST, MICHAEL 1738 §103 Final Rejection 32d overdue Pending Jan 20, 2023
17616899 Biogas upgrading to methanol BAHTA, MEDHANIT W 1692 §103 Non-Final OA 103d overdue Pending Dec 06, 2021
17421414 Chemical plant with a reforming section and a process for producing a chemical product KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE 1774 §103 Final Rejection 107d overdue Pending Jul 08, 2021
17421449 PARALLEL REFORMING IN CHEMICAL PLANT LEUNG, JENNIFER A 1774 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 08, 2021
17274654 CARBON RECYCLING IN STEAM REFORMING PROCESS AKRAM, IMRAN 1725 §103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Mar 09, 2021
17058970 EXPANDER FOR SOEC APPLICATIONS PARENT, ALEXANDER RENE 1795 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 70d Pending Nov 25, 2020
16743239 THERMOLYTIC FRAGMENTATION OF SUGARS WITHERSPOON, SIKARL A 1692 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2020

Managing Haldor Topsøe A/S's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month