Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| §102 only | 2 (50%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CADUGAN, ERICA E | 1 | 63.0% | +52.7% |
| SOLIS, ERICK R | 1 | 86.0% | +9.5% |
| AIYASH, ALMUTASIM HEZAM | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| FINK, THOMAS ANDREW | 1 | 64.8% | +32.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18882528 | ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME | SOLIS, ERICK R | 15d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18960409 | JIG FOR REFLECTION DEVICE AND ASSEMBLY INCLUDING THE SAME | CADUGAN, ERICA E | 22d |
| 18385787 | ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR | FINK, THOMAS ANDREW | 84d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3722 | 1 |
| 3747 | 1 |
| 3678 | 1 |
| 3746 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18960409 | JIG FOR REFLECTION DEVICE AND ASSEMBLY INCLUDING THE SAME | CADUGAN, ERICA E | 3722 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 22d | Pending | Nov 26, 2024 |
| 18882528 | ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME | SOLIS, ERICK R | 3747 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 15d overdue | Pending | Sep 11, 2024 |
| 18425620 | AIRCRAFT ASSEMBLY SYSTEM | AIYASH, ALMUTASIM HEZAM | 3678 | — | Non-Final OA | 40d | Pending | Jan 29, 2024 |
| 18385787 | ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR | FINK, THOMAS ANDREW | 3746 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 84d | Pending | Oct 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial