Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 0 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Innovation For Creative Devices Co. Ltd. currently has 3 pending office actions. These matters are distributed across 3 distinct examiners, which means that each pending action is being reviewed by a different individual. The data indicates that there are 0 distinct art units associated with this portfolio.
The busiest examiner for the company is MILLER, JR, JOSEPH ALBERT, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 3 distinct examiners for the 3 pending actions, the workload is evenly spread, and no single examiner holds a majority of the pending cases. This decentralized arrangement requires the company to manage three separate examination styles simultaneously. The lack of distinct art units in the data suggests a specific administrative placement for these 3 pending office actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MILLER, JR, JOSEPH ALBERT | 1 | 68.4% | +16.2% |
| MOORE, KARLA A | 1 | 43.1% | +14.0% |
| CHEN, KEATH T | 1 | 30.2% | +24.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18631194 | CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMA SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS | MILLER, JR, JOSEPH ALBERT | — |
| 18623190 | DC PULSE PLASMA SUBSTRATE TREATMENT APPARATUS | MOORE, KARLA A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18631194 | CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMA SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS | MILLER, JR, JOSEPH ALBERT | — |
| 18623190 | DC PULSE PLASMA SUBSTRATE TREATMENT APPARATUS | MOORE, KARLA A | — |
| 18613512 | PLASMA SUBSTRATE TREATMENT APPARATUS | CHEN, KEATH T | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18631194 | CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMA SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS | MILLER, JR, JOSEPH ALBERT | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 10, 2024 |
| 18623190 | DC PULSE PLASMA SUBSTRATE TREATMENT APPARATUS | MOORE, KARLA A | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 01, 2024 |
| 18613512 | PLASMA SUBSTRATE TREATMENT APPARATUS | CHEN, KEATH T | — | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial