Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Iontra Inc.

8 pending office actions • 3 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (12%)
7
Medium (88%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (12%)
§103 only7 (88%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
7
Semiconductors
88% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK 2 25.0% -50.0%
SILVA, FRANK ALEXIS 1 35.5% +57.7%
EVANS, GEOFFREY T 1 85.1% +8.8%
ST CYR, DANIEL 1 81.3% +13.3%
HENZE, DAVID V 1 70.6% +23.2%
OMAR, AHMED H 1 75.1% +14.2%
NGHIEM, MICHAEL P 1 67.4% +24.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18225274 SMART BATTERY ST CYR, DANIEL 61d

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17698890 ADDRESSING PARASITICS IN A BATTERY CHARGING SYSTEM UTILIZING HARMONIC CHARGING MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK 81d overdue
18127634 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS OF NOISY APPEARING SIGNALS FOR BATTERY CHARGING MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK 50d overdue
18232331 MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROLLER ARCHITECTURE AND METHOD OF GENERATING AN OPTIMIZED ENERGY SIGNAL FOR CHARGING A BATTERY EVANS, GEOFFREY T 15d

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19200246 BATTERY MONITORING AND CHARGING CONTROL BY MEASURING ELECTRODYNAMIC PARAMETERS SILVA, FRANK ALEXIS 100d overdue
17856675 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT OF A BATTERY CELL NGHIEM, MICHAEL P 25d overdue
18111878 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR WIRELESS BATTERY CHARGING USING CIRCUIT MODELING OMAR, AHMED H 16d overdue
18113578 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLED BATTERY HEATING HENZE, DAVID V 33d
18225274 SMART BATTERY ST CYR, DANIEL 61d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2859 5
2852 1
2857 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19200246 BATTERY MONITORING AND CHARGING CONTROL BY MEASURING ELECTRODYNAMIC PARAMETERS SILVA, FRANK ALEXIS 2859 §103 Final Rejection 100d overdue Pending May 06, 2025
18232331 MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROLLER ARCHITECTURE AND METHOD OF GENERATING AN OPTIMIZED ENERGY SIGNAL FOR CHARGING A BATTERY EVANS, GEOFFREY T 2852 §101 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Aug 09, 2023
18225274 SMART BATTERY ST CYR, DANIEL §103 Non-Final OA 61d Pending Jul 24, 2023
18127634 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS OF NOISY APPEARING SIGNALS FOR BATTERY CHARGING MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK 2859 §103 Non-Final OA 50d overdue Pending Mar 28, 2023
18113578 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLED BATTERY HEATING HENZE, DAVID V 2859 §103 Non-Final OA 33d Pending Feb 23, 2023
18111878 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR WIRELESS BATTERY CHARGING USING CIRCUIT MODELING OMAR, AHMED H 2859 §103 Non-Final OA 16d overdue Pending Feb 20, 2023
17856675 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT OF A BATTERY CELL NGHIEM, MICHAEL P 2857 §103 Non-Final OA 25d overdue Pending Jul 01, 2022
17698890 ADDRESSING PARASITICS IN A BATTERY CHARGING SYSTEM UTILIZING HARMONIC CHARGING MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK 2859 §103 Final Rejection 81d overdue Pending Mar 18, 2022

Managing Iontra Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month