Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Kineolabs Inc.

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

4 pending office actions • 1 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kineolabs Inc. maintains a portfolio in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area with 4 pending office actions. These 4 actions are assigned to 4 distinct examiners, indicating that every pending case is under the review of a different person. This ratio of examiners to actions suggests a lack of examiner-level concentration in the company's current prosecution efforts. For the practitioner, this means that each case must be argued on its own merits without the benefit of a single examiner's familiarity with the broader portfolio.

Despite the variety of examiners, all prosecution activity is centered within 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner, GRAY, SUNGHEE Y, is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because there are 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners, the workload is evenly distributed, with no single examiner managing more than 1 action. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests a specialized technical focus, even as the company navigates the individual requirements of 4 distinct examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
4
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GRAY, SUNGHEE Y 1 83.2% +10.8%
HANEY, NOAH JAMES 1 79.0% +31.7%
AMARA, MOHAMED K 1 75.8% +29.8%
RIZVI, AKBAR HASSAN 1 87.9% +15.2%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18359337 Compact all free-space line-field swept source OCT system RIZVI, AKBAR HASSAN 2d overdue
18981070 Line-field OCT System with K Space Calibration GRAY, SUNGHEE Y —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18950320 Line-field OCT System with Multi Transverse Mode Laser HANEY, NOAH JAMES —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18736769 Relative intensity noise Cat's-eye swept source laser for OCT and spectroscopy AMARA, MOHAMED K 45d overdue
18359337 Compact all free-space line-field swept source OCT system RIZVI, AKBAR HASSAN 2d overdue
18981070 Line-field OCT System with K Space Calibration GRAY, SUNGHEE Y —
18950320 Line-field OCT System with Multi Transverse Mode Laser HANEY, NOAH JAMES —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2877 4

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18981070 Line-field OCT System with K Space Calibration GRAY, SUNGHEE Y 2877 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 13, 2024
18950320 Line-field OCT System with Multi Transverse Mode Laser HANEY, NOAH JAMES 2877 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18736769 Relative intensity noise Cat's-eye swept source laser for OCT and spectroscopy AMARA, MOHAMED K 2877 §103 Final Rejection 45d overdue Pending Jun 07, 2024
18359337 Compact all free-space line-field swept source OCT system RIZVI, AKBAR HASSAN 2877 §103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Jul 26, 2023

Managing Kineolabs Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month