Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Kodiak Robotics Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

10 pending office actions • 9 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 34 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kodiak Robotics Inc. maintains a patent portfolio with 11 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 10 distinct examiners and 10 distinct art units. This high level of distribution indicates that the company's technology spans a wide array of sub-disciplines, requiring the management of many different examiner relationships and art unit standards simultaneously. Practitioners must be prepared for a prosecution landscape where different units may have varying timelines and examination rigors.

The busiest examiner for Kodiak Robotics Inc. is LEVY, MERRITT E, who is handling 2 pending office actions. While LEVY, MERRITT E has the highest individual workload, this only accounts for a small portion of the 11 total pending office actions. The remaining actions are spread across other examiners, meaning that the vast majority of the portfolio is subject to unique individual reviews. This distribution suggests that no single examiner has a dominant influence over the company's overall prosecution outcomes, necessitating an adaptable legal strategy.

With 10 distinct art units involved, the portfolio is diversified across the USPTO's Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems division. The fact that the 11 pending office actions are spread so widely shows that almost every matter is being treated as a distinct technical category. This variety requires practitioners to coordinate across multiple silos to ensure consistent messaging while respecting the unique procedural nuances of each involved art unit. The complexity of this portfolio reflects the diverse mechanical and electronic systems inherent in the company's innovation pipeline.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (20%)
8
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only8 (80%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
10% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
80% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEVY, MERRITT E 2 32.3% +33.5%
PEDERSEN, DAVID RUBEN 1 57.0% +51.2%
FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 1 57.1% +22.4%
HO, MATTHEW 1 73.9% +12.6%
WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY 1 23.8% +94.1%
WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE 1 50.0% +58.3%
FABER, DAVID 1 50.9% +37.1%
MILLNER, MONICA E 1 77.5% +22.2%
CLEMMONS, STEVE M 1 69.5% +21.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18179075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A HEATMAP CORRESPONDING TO AN ENVIRONMENT OF A VEHICLE WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE 29d overdue
18129705 ROOF MOUNTED SENSOR POD ASSEMBLY WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY 5d overdue
17826043 CONNECTING ASSEMBLY FOR A SENSOR POD CLEMMONS, STEVE M —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18179075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A HEATMAP CORRESPONDING TO AN ENVIRONMENT OF A VEHICLE WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE 29d overdue
18129705 ROOF MOUNTED SENSOR POD ASSEMBLY WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY 5d overdue
17826031 QUICK SWAP SENSOR POD AND BRACKET SYSTEM MILLNER, MONICA E 22d
18364816 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE CONTROL USING AUTONOMOUS AND REMOTE OPERATION LEVY, MERRITT E 46d
18364822 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING VEHICLE ACTUATOR COMMANDS BASED ON VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES LEVY, MERRITT E 49d
18364819 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE CONTROL USING FALLBACK-ENABLED REMOTE OPERATION HO, MATTHEW 56d
18364825 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING MOVEMENT OF A VEHICLE USING REMOTE OPERATION BASED ON PERCEPTION AND PLANNER DATA PEDERSEN, DAVID RUBEN —
18364830 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING A TRAJECTORY OF A VEHICLE BY MIXING AUTONOMOUSLY GENERATED AND REMOTELY GENERATED VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3663 2
3658 1
3662 1
3669 1
3667 1
2677 1
2172 1
3632 1
3613 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18364822 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING VEHICLE ACTUATOR COMMANDS BASED ON VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES LEVY, MERRITT E 3663 §103 Final Rejection 49d Pending Aug 03, 2023
18364825 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING MOVEMENT OF A VEHICLE USING REMOTE OPERATION BASED ON PERCEPTION AND PLANNER DATA PEDERSEN, DAVID RUBEN 3658 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 03, 2023
18364830 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING A TRAJECTORY OF A VEHICLE BY MIXING AUTONOMOUSLY GENERATED AND REMOTELY GENERATED VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 3662 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 03, 2023
18364819 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE CONTROL USING FALLBACK-ENABLED REMOTE OPERATION HO, MATTHEW 3669 §103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Aug 03, 2023
18364816 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE CONTROL USING AUTONOMOUS AND REMOTE OPERATION LEVY, MERRITT E 3663 §103 Non-Final OA 46d Pending Aug 03, 2023
18129705 ROOF MOUNTED SENSOR POD ASSEMBLY WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY 3667 §103 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Mar 31, 2023
18179075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A HEATMAP CORRESPONDING TO AN ENVIRONMENT OF A VEHICLE WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE 2677 §102§103 Non-Final OA 29d overdue Pending Mar 06, 2023
18178720 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING AND LABELING A COLLIDABILITY OF ONE OR MORE OBSTACLES ALONG TRAJECTORIES OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FABER, DAVID 2172 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2023
17826031 QUICK SWAP SENSOR POD AND BRACKET SYSTEM MILLNER, MONICA E 3632 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending May 26, 2022
17826043 CONNECTING ASSEMBLY FOR A SENSOR POD CLEMMONS, STEVE M 3613 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 26, 2022

Managing Kodiak Robotics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month