Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 3 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 24 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd. operates a company patent portfolio within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The portfolio currently has 6 pending office actions, which are distributed across 6 distinct examiners. This direct ratio between the pending actions and the 6 distinct examiners suggests a broad distribution of the workload across different individuals at the patent office.

Examination for these filings is spread across 3 distinct art units, indicating that the technology within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area spans multiple specialized groups. TSION M TUMEBO is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, though this examiner is only responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This reflects a fragmented prosecution environment where no single examiner holds a majority of the 6 pending office actions.

The presence of 3 distinct art units requires a prosecution strategy that accounts for varying standards and practices across different technical divisions. Because there are multiple examiners involved, the company must manage several simultaneous dialogues. Even the busiest examiner, TSION M TUMEBO, only handles 1 busiest examiner pending office action, highlighting the diverse range of perspectives currently reviewing the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
50% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
2
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TUMEBO, TSION M 1 66.5% +20.2%
JOHNSON, RYAN 1 83.8% +15.7%
FERNANDEZ, PEDRO C 1 76.4% +16.8%
LEE, NATHANIEL J. 1 63.4% +21.5%
BRADFORD, PETER 1 80.7% +4.3%
EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE 1 64.1% +19.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18925033 LIGHTING APPARATUS JOHNSON, RYAN —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18199667 HEATING APPARATUS EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE 15d
19386910 LIGHTING APPARATUS TUMEBO, TSION M —
18811619 LIGHTING APPARATUS FERNANDEZ, PEDRO C —
18641584 LIGHTING APPARATUS BRADFORD, PETER —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18199667 HEATING APPARATUS EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE 15d
18784891 LIGHTING APPARATUS LEE, NATHANIEL J. 34d
19386910 LIGHTING APPARATUS TUMEBO, TSION M —
18925033 LIGHTING APPARATUS JOHNSON, RYAN —
18811619 LIGHTING APPARATUS FERNANDEZ, PEDRO C —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2875 2
2844 1
3761 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19386910 LIGHTING APPARATUS TUMEBO, TSION M 2875 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2025
18925033 LIGHTING APPARATUS JOHNSON, RYAN — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 24, 2024
18811619 LIGHTING APPARATUS FERNANDEZ, PEDRO C 2844 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 21, 2024
18784891 LIGHTING APPARATUS LEE, NATHANIEL J. 2875 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Jul 25, 2024
18641584 LIGHTING APPARATUS BRADFORD, PETER — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 22, 2024
18199667 HEATING APPARATUS EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE 3761 §103§112 Non-Final OA 15d Pending May 19, 2023

Managing Leedarson Lighting Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month