Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
7 pending office actions • 3 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 26 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 7 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEMBER, THOMAS M | 2 | 84.6% | +11.2% |
| TON, ANABEL | 1 | 87.4% | +2.5% |
| LEE, NATHANIEL J. | 1 | 63.2% | +22.0% |
| TRAN, MINH | 1 | 86.2% | +16.0% |
| EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE | 1 | 66.7% | +17.1% |
| ULATOWSKI, EMMA ELIZABETH | 1 | — | — |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18989683 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | SEMBER, THOMAS M | 138d overdue |
| 19025113 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | TON, ANABEL | 59d overdue |
| 18412460 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | TRAN, MINH | 38d overdue |
| 19259228 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | SEMBER, THOMAS M | 8d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18989683 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | SEMBER, THOMAS M | 138d overdue |
| 18412460 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | TRAN, MINH | 38d overdue |
| 19259228 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | SEMBER, THOMAS M | 8d overdue |
| 18199667 | HEATING APPARATUS | EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE | 15d |
| 18784891 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | LEE, NATHANIEL J. | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2875 | 4 |
| 3761 | 2 |
| 2844 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19259228 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | SEMBER, THOMAS M | 2875 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 8d overdue | Pending | Jul 03, 2025 |
| 19025113 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | TON, ANABEL | 2875 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 59d overdue | Pending | Jan 16, 2025 |
| 18989683 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | SEMBER, THOMAS M | 2875 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 138d overdue | Pending | Dec 20, 2024 |
| 18784891 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | LEE, NATHANIEL J. | 2875 | §103 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Jul 25, 2024 |
| 18412460 | LIGHTING APPARATUS | TRAN, MINH | 2844 | §103 | Final Rejection | 38d overdue | Pending | Jan 12, 2024 |
| 18199667 | HEATING APPARATUS | EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE | 3761 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | May 19, 2023 |
| 18112504 | Barbecue grill apparatus | ULATOWSKI, EMMA ELIZABETH | 3761 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 13d | Pending | Feb 22, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial