Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Mondi AG

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (60%)
2
Easy (40%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (60%)
§112 only2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
80% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FORTUNA, JOSE A 1 79.4% +9.6%
ATTEL, NINA KAY 1 40.7% +28.4%
SMITH JR., JIMMY R 1 64.9% +42.9%
RAJA, JAANZEB CHAANGEZ 1 75.0% +0.0%
KESSLER JR, THOMAS JOSEPH 1 45.0% +49.3%

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16964067 PLASTIC FILM COMPOSITE, PLASTIC PACKAGING AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PLASTIC FILM COMPOSITE KESSLER JR, THOMAS JOSEPH 35d overdue
18500085 RELEASE LINER FOR REPOSITIONABLE ADHESIVE ARTICLES SMITH JR., JIMMY R 28d
18722634 PACKAGING BAG AND USE OF THE PACKAGING BAG ATTEL, NINA KAY 35d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1748 1
3734 1
1745 1
1736 1
1782 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18836500 TRANSPARENT PAPER FORTUNA, JOSE A 1748 §112 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Aug 07, 2024
18722634 PACKAGING BAG AND USE OF THE PACKAGING BAG ATTEL, NINA KAY 3734 §103 Final Rejection 35d Pending Jun 21, 2024
18500085 RELEASE LINER FOR REPOSITIONABLE ADHESIVE ARTICLES SMITH JR., JIMMY R 1745 §112 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Nov 01, 2023
18258971 METHOD FOR PRODUCING DERIVATIZED STARCH RAJA, JAANZEB CHAANGEZ 1736 §103 Non-Final OA 66d overdue Pending Jun 22, 2023
16964067 PLASTIC FILM COMPOSITE, PLASTIC PACKAGING AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PLASTIC FILM COMPOSITE KESSLER JR, THOMAS JOSEPH 1782 §103 Final Rejection 35d overdue Pending Jul 22, 2020

Managing Mondi AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month