Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Persimmon Technologies Corporation

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Persimmon Technologies Corporation currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This workload is distributed across 4 distinct examiners, which means the pending matters are being reviewed by different individuals. The portfolio spans 2 distinct art units, which suggests a focused technical scope for these applications.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is KC, SAGAR, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because this individual handles a minority of the total workload, the prosecution burden is spread across the assigned personnel. Practitioners should prepare for varied examination styles across the 2 distinct art units involved, as no individual examiner dominates the total volume of cases.

The distribution of examiners across the technical groups implies that some officials may share the same departmental supervisors. This structure requires a legal strategy that accounts for individual preferences while remaining mindful of art unit-wide trends. Successfully navigating the applications will involve addressing the specific requirements of KC, SAGAR and the other assigned officials.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KC, SAGAR 1 86.5% +5.6%
LOWE, MICHAEL S 1 66.8% +19.9%
CROWELL, ANNA M 1 44.6% +30.5%
TIGHE, BRENDAN P 1 76.0% +19.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19075995 Material-Handling Robot With Magnetically Guided End-Effectors KC, SAGAR —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17221021 Core-Shell Particles and Composite Material Synthesized Therefrom CROWELL, ANNA M 100d overdue
18426659 Material Handling Robot LOWE, MICHAEL S 29d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17221021 Core-Shell Particles and Composite Material Synthesized Therefrom CROWELL, ANNA M 100d overdue
18426659 Material Handling Robot LOWE, MICHAEL S 29d
17001884 Robot Linear Drive Heat Transfer TIGHE, BRENDAN P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3652 2
1716 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19075995 Material-Handling Robot With Magnetically Guided End-Effectors KC, SAGAR — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 11, 2025
18426659 Material Handling Robot LOWE, MICHAEL S 3652 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Jan 30, 2024
17221021 Core-Shell Particles and Composite Material Synthesized Therefrom CROWELL, ANNA M 1716 §102§103 Non-Final OA 100d overdue Pending Apr 02, 2021
17001884 Robot Linear Drive Heat Transfer TIGHE, BRENDAN P 3652 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 25, 2020

Managing Persimmon Technologies Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month