Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Plusai Inc.

10 pending office actions • 6 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
7
Medium (70%)
1
Easy (10%)
2
Unknown (20%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only6 (60%)
§102 only1 (10%)
§112 only1 (10%)
No statute on record2 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
10
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MERLINO, DAVID P 2 71.2% +12.1%
JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE 1 80.0% +28.3%
HILGENDORF, DALE W 1 84.5% +21.6%
SOOD, ANSHUL 1 82.8% +12.4%
WEBER, TAMARA L 1 87.1% +12.1%
MCCULLERS, AARON KYLE 1 45.2% +33.9%
ROBERT, DANIEL M 1 79.1% +8.8%
ELARABI, TAREK A 1 69.3% +35.7%
FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 1 55.1% +25.5%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18798704 OFFBOARD INFRASTRUCTURE TO AUGMENT VEHICLE SYSTEMS SOOD, ANSHUL 38d overdue
18646649 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CAUSING A LANE CHANGE MANEUVER OF AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE WEBER, TAMARA L 20d
18945382 Ambiguous Lane Detection Event Miner HILGENDORF, DALE W 21d

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18808067 DETECTING ROAD AND WEATHER CONDITIONS FOR VEHICLE DRIVING MERLINO, DAVID P 161d overdue
18798704 OFFBOARD INFRASTRUCTURE TO AUGMENT VEHICLE SYSTEMS SOOD, ANSHUL 38d overdue
18202104 On-Vehicle Driving Behavior Modelling MERLINO, DAVID P 11d overdue
18630908 AUTOMATIC CONTROL OF HIGH BEAM OPERATION MCCULLERS, AARON KYLE 9d
18646649 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CAUSING A LANE CHANGE MANEUVER OF AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE WEBER, TAMARA L 20d
18945382 Ambiguous Lane Detection Event Miner HILGENDORF, DALE W 21d
18234668 OPERATING A VEHICLE IN RESPONSE TO DETECTING A FAULTY SENSOR USING CALIBRATION PARAMETERS OF THE SENSOR FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 34d
18979408 SURROUNDING TRAFFIC SPEED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE 35d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3665 3
3662 2
3667 2
3657 1
3663 1
3661 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18979408 SURROUNDING TRAFFIC SPEED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE 3657 Other Non-Final OA 35d Pending Dec 12, 2024
18945382 Ambiguous Lane Detection Event Miner HILGENDORF, DALE W 3662 §112 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Nov 12, 2024
18808067 DETECTING ROAD AND WEATHER CONDITIONS FOR VEHICLE DRIVING MERLINO, DAVID P 3665 §103 Final Rejection 161d overdue Pending Aug 18, 2024
18798704 OFFBOARD INFRASTRUCTURE TO AUGMENT VEHICLE SYSTEMS SOOD, ANSHUL 3667 §103 Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending Aug 08, 2024
18646649 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CAUSING A LANE CHANGE MANEUVER OF AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE WEBER, TAMARA L 3667 §103 Non-Final OA 20d Pending Apr 25, 2024
18630908 AUTOMATIC CONTROL OF HIGH BEAM OPERATION MCCULLERS, AARON KYLE 3663 Other Final Rejection 9d Pending Apr 09, 2024
18440826 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR TAMPER DETECTION OF A VEHICLE SYSTEM ROBERT, DANIEL M 3665 §103 Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending Feb 13, 2024
18243575 DETERMINING ACCEPTABLE RESPONSES FOR NAVIGATING A VEHICLE THAT ACCOUNTS FOR EXTERNAL CONDITIONS OF THE VEHICLE ELARABI, TAREK A 3661 §102 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Sep 07, 2023
18234668 OPERATING A VEHICLE IN RESPONSE TO DETECTING A FAULTY SENSOR USING CALIBRATION PARAMETERS OF THE SENSOR FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 3662 §103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Aug 16, 2023
18202104 On-Vehicle Driving Behavior Modelling MERLINO, DAVID P 3665 §103 Non-Final OA 11d overdue Pending May 25, 2023

Managing Plusai Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month