Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Praxis Precision Medicines Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

11 pending office actions • 5 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Praxis Precision Medicines Inc. has 10 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed across 5 distinct art units, indicating that the company's patent strategy covers several specialized biological or chemical domains. With 9 distinct examiners assigned to these 10 cases, the company experiences a high degree of examiner variety, as nearly every pending action is being reviewed by a different individual.

CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 2 pending office actions. This examiner's involvement in 2 out of the 10 total actions makes them a key figure in the company's current prosecution landscape. For a portfolio of this size, having 9 distinct examiners means that the prosecution team must adapt to many different individual styles and requirements across the 5 art units.

The spread of 10 pending office actions across 5 distinct art units suggests a multi-faceted approach to Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. Because 9 distinct examiners are involved, the company must manage a wide range of feedback and potential rejections. With CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S handling a portion of the actions, the remaining cases are split among other examiners, emphasizing the need for a versatile legal strategy that can address the specific nuances of each examiner's perspective.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (36%)
4
Medium (36%)
2
Easy (18%)
1
Unknown (9%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only2 (18%)
§112 only1 (9%)
Double-patenting only1 (9%)
Double-patenting + other2 (18%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (36%)
No statute on record1 (9%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
64% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
4
Business / Other
36% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 2 72.7% +18.3%
SASAN, ARADHANA 1 64.5% +26.2%
JACKSON-TONGUE, LAKIA J 1 69.0% +20.8%
JACKSON, SHAWQUIA 1 78.0% -3.3%
VALENROD, YEVGENY 1 72.6% +25.1%
WHITE, DAWANNA SHAR-DAY 1 62.5% +23.3%
RICCI, CRAIG D 1 53.5% +52.7%
LEE, CHIHYI NMN 1 33.7% +60.8%
JARRELL, NOBLE E 1 81.1% +9.7%
HUTTER, GILLIAN A 1 54.5% +46.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18556958 KCNT1 INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF USE JARRELL, NOBLE E —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18546800 HEMI-CITRATE SALTS OF GABA-A POSITIVE ALLOSTERIC MODULATOR AND CRYSTALLINE FORM THEREOF CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 22d
19066412 DYNAMIC CLAMPS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF JACKSON-TONGUE, LAKIA J —
18852579 T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS COMPRISING A PIPERAZINE OR 1,4-DIAZEPANE CORE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF WHITE, DAWANNA SHAR-DAY —
18852396 T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS COMPRISING A DIAZASPIROHEPTANE CORE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF RICCI, CRAIG D —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18546800 HEMI-CITRATE SALTS OF GABA-A POSITIVE ALLOSTERIC MODULATOR AND CRYSTALLINE FORM THEREOF CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 22d
19540291 HIGH STRENGTH SINGLE UNIT DOSE FORMULATIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF SASAN, ARADHANA —
19066412 DYNAMIC CLAMPS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF JACKSON-TONGUE, LAKIA J —
18927451 TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS VALENROD, YEVGENY —
18852579 T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS COMPRISING A PIPERAZINE OR 1,4-DIAZEPANE CORE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF WHITE, DAWANNA SHAR-DAY —
18852396 T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS COMPRISING A DIAZASPIROHEPTANE CORE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF RICCI, CRAIG D —
18834466 METHODS OF TREATMENT USING T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS LEE, CHIHYI NMN —
18746428 FORMULATIONS OF T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1625 3
1615 1
1645 1
1628 1
1699 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19540291 HIGH STRENGTH SINGLE UNIT DOSE FORMULATIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF SASAN, ARADHANA 1615 DP Final Rejection — Pending Feb 13, 2026
19066412 DYNAMIC CLAMPS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF JACKSON-TONGUE, LAKIA J 1645 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2025
18864098 METHODS OF USE OF T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS JACKSON, SHAWQUIA — §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2024
18927451 TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS VALENROD, YEVGENY 1628 §103DPOther Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18852579 T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS COMPRISING A PIPERAZINE OR 1,4-DIAZEPANE CORE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF WHITE, DAWANNA SHAR-DAY — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 30, 2024
18852396 T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS COMPRISING A DIAZASPIROHEPTANE CORE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF RICCI, CRAIG D — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2024
18834466 METHODS OF TREATMENT USING T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS LEE, CHIHYI NMN — §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 30, 2024
18746428 FORMULATIONS OF T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL MODULATORS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 1625 — Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 18, 2024
18556958 KCNT1 INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF USE JARRELL, NOBLE E 1699 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 24, 2023
18546800 HEMI-CITRATE SALTS OF GABA-A POSITIVE ALLOSTERIC MODULATOR AND CRYSTALLINE FORM THEREOF CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 1625 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 22d Pending Aug 17, 2023
17607815 KCNT1 INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF USE HUTTER, GILLIAN A 1625 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 29, 2021

Managing Praxis Precision Medicines Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month