Technology area: Computing & Software
5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 41 patents granted in the last 365 days
Rebellions Inc. has 5 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are assigned to 5 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This indicates that while the technology is concentrated in 2 distinct art units, the patent office has distributed the review process among 5 different individuals. Such a distribution means the company must address 5 pending office actions within the Computing & Software domain.
The busiest examiner is WADDY JR, EDWARD, who currently holds 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 5 distinct examiners in total, each is likely handling 1 action. The concentration in 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's software innovations fall into 2 primary technical categories. Practitioners must balance the requirements of the assigned art units while navigating the individual preferences of WADDY JR, EDWARD and the other examiners involved with the 1 busiest examiner pending action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WADDY JR, EDWARD | 1 | 83.1% | +21.1% |
| YU, JAE UN | 1 | 89.8% | +9.8% |
| GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE | 1 | 74.3% | +13.4% |
| CAO, DIEM K | 1 | 80.5% | +18.8% |
| GONZALES, VINCENT | 1 | 78.7% | +11.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19093091 | NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DATA THEREOF | YU, JAE UN | — |
| 18642434 | NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME | CAO, DIEM K | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19218935 | NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND TRANSACTION TRACKING METHOD THEREOF | WADDY JR, EDWARD | — |
| 19041844 | RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY BANK, RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY, SYSTEM-ON-CHIP HAVING SAME MOUNTED THEREON, AND METHOD FOR USING RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY | GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE | — |
| 18580199 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING SATURATION RATIO-BASED QUANTIZATION RANGE FOR QUANTIZATION OF NEURAL NETWORK | GONZALES, VINCENT | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19218935 | NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND TRANSACTION TRACKING METHOD THEREOF | WADDY JR, EDWARD | — |
| 19041844 | RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY BANK, RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY, SYSTEM-ON-CHIP HAVING SAME MOUNTED THEREON, AND METHOD FOR USING RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY | GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE | — |
| 18642434 | NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME | CAO, DIEM K | — |
| 18580199 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING SATURATION RATIO-BASED QUANTIZATION RANGE FOR QUANTIZATION OF NEURAL NETWORK | GONZALES, VINCENT | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2138 | 1 |
| 2196 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19218935 | NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND TRANSACTION TRACKING METHOD THEREOF | WADDY JR, EDWARD | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 27, 2025 |
| 19093091 | NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DATA THEREOF | YU, JAE UN | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 27, 2025 |
| 19041844 | RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY BANK, RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY, SYSTEM-ON-CHIP HAVING SAME MOUNTED THEREON, AND METHOD FOR USING RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY | GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE | 2138 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 30, 2025 |
| 18642434 | NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME | CAO, DIEM K | 2196 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 22, 2024 |
| 18580199 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING SATURATION RATIO-BASED QUANTIZATION RANGE FOR QUANTIZATION OF NEURAL NETWORK | GONZALES, VINCENT | — | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial