Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Rebellions Inc.

Technology area: Computing & Software

5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 41 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Rebellions Inc. has 5 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are assigned to 5 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This indicates that while the technology is concentrated in 2 distinct art units, the patent office has distributed the review process among 5 different individuals. Such a distribution means the company must address 5 pending office actions within the Computing & Software domain.

The busiest examiner is WADDY JR, EDWARD, who currently holds 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 5 distinct examiners in total, each is likely handling 1 action. The concentration in 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's software innovations fall into 2 primary technical categories. Practitioners must balance the requirements of the assigned art units while navigating the individual preferences of WADDY JR, EDWARD and the other examiners involved with the 1 busiest examiner pending action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
40% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
60% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WADDY JR, EDWARD 1 83.1% +21.1%
YU, JAE UN 1 89.8% +9.8%
GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE 1 74.3% +13.4%
CAO, DIEM K 1 80.5% +18.8%
GONZALES, VINCENT 1 78.7% +11.2%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19093091 NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DATA THEREOF YU, JAE UN —
18642434 NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME CAO, DIEM K —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19218935 NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND TRANSACTION TRACKING METHOD THEREOF WADDY JR, EDWARD —
19041844 RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY BANK, RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY, SYSTEM-ON-CHIP HAVING SAME MOUNTED THEREON, AND METHOD FOR USING RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE —
18580199 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING SATURATION RATIO-BASED QUANTIZATION RANGE FOR QUANTIZATION OF NEURAL NETWORK GONZALES, VINCENT —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19218935 NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND TRANSACTION TRACKING METHOD THEREOF WADDY JR, EDWARD —
19041844 RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY BANK, RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY, SYSTEM-ON-CHIP HAVING SAME MOUNTED THEREON, AND METHOD FOR USING RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE —
18642434 NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME CAO, DIEM K —
18580199 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING SATURATION RATIO-BASED QUANTIZATION RANGE FOR QUANTIZATION OF NEURAL NETWORK GONZALES, VINCENT —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2138 1
2196 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19218935 NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND TRANSACTION TRACKING METHOD THEREOF WADDY JR, EDWARD — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 27, 2025
19093091 NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DATA THEREOF YU, JAE UN — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2025
19041844 RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY BANK, RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY, SYSTEM-ON-CHIP HAVING SAME MOUNTED THEREON, AND METHOD FOR USING RECONFIGURABLE ON-CHIP MEMORY GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE 2138 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 30, 2025
18642434 NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME CAO, DIEM K 2196 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 22, 2024
18580199 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING SATURATION RATIO-BASED QUANTIZATION RANGE FOR QUANTIZATION OF NEURAL NETWORK GONZALES, VINCENT — §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 18, 2024

Managing Rebellions Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month