Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Sanden Corporation

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 4 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sanden Corporation operates in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company has 8 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 8 distinct examiners, ensuring independent evaluation for each matter. This distribution suggests that the company's applications are subject to a wide variety of individual perspectives rather than being funneled to a small group of specialists.

The prosecution involves 4 distinct art units. This suggests that the company's innovations are being categorized into four different specialized groups. Practitioners must be prepared to address the specific nuances of these 4 units. The variety of art units indicates that the portfolio's technical scope is expansive, requiring expertise in multiple disciplines to effectively respond to office actions.

ESTEVEZ, DAIRON is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. The busiest examiner pending count is 1, confirming that the workload is evenly split among the examiners. No single examiner has a concentrated influence over the current pending portfolio. Practitioners should focus on the individual requirements of each official involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
4
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (57%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ESTEVEZ, DAIRON 1 68.4% -12.1%
SHAIKH, MERAJ A 1 57.3% +22.3%
MATTHIAS, JONATHAN R 1 78.2% +21.0%
PEKARSKAYA, LILYA 1 67.7% +41.5%
SINGH, ALEXANDER A 1 77.0% +2.3%
CHOI, SEUNG HO 1 100.0% +0.0%
BERTHEAUD, PETER JOHN 1 78.2% +8.4%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19120171 VEHICLE AIR CONDITIONING DEVICE SHAIKH, MERAJ A —
18871355 ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR SINGH, ALEXANDER A —
18844895 POWER CONVERSION DEVICE CHOI, SEUNG HO —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19120171 VEHICLE AIR CONDITIONING DEVICE SHAIKH, MERAJ A —
19107277 ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR MATTHIAS, JONATHAN R —
18873048 ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR PEKARSKAYA, LILYA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3746 3
3656 1
3763 1
2838 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19136191 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE ESTEVEZ, DAIRON 3656 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 05, 2025
19120171 VEHICLE AIR CONDITIONING DEVICE SHAIKH, MERAJ A 3763 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 10, 2025
19107277 ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR MATTHIAS, JONATHAN R 3746 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2025
18873048 ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR PEKARSKAYA, LILYA 3746 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 09, 2024
18871355 ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR SINGH, ALEXANDER A — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 03, 2024
18844895 POWER CONVERSION DEVICE CHOI, SEUNG HO 2838 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18835274 ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR BERTHEAUD, PETER JOHN 3746 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 01, 2024

Managing Sanden Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month