Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026

Seegrid Corporation

15 pending office actions • 10 art units • 14 examiners • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (27%)
10
Medium (67%)
1
Easy (7%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only9 (60%)
§102 only1 (7%)
Double-patenting only1 (7%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (27%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
7% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
73% of docket
3
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PEPPER, ANDREW KILLIAN 2
JOHNS, HILARY LYNN 1 81.8% +15.9%
FITZHARRIS, KATHERINE MARIE 1 33.3% -4.4%
RINK, RYAN J 1 78.3% +10.8%
MOSCOLA, MATTHEW JOHN 1 64.2% +18.2%
ANWARI, MACEEH 1 81.2% +5.4%
RANDAZZO, THOMAS 1 86.7% +12.4%
GLENN III, FRANK T 1 54.4% +3.5%
JONES, JODI MARIE 1 70.1% +10.7%
CULLEN, TANNER L 1 71.3% +16.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18928423 LATERALLY OPERATING PAYLOAD HANDLING DEVICE JOHNS, HILARY LYNN
18849310 LANE GRID SETUP FOR AUTONOMOUS MOBILE ROBOT ANWARI, MACEEH

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18852369 A SYSTEM FOR AMRS THAT LEVERAGES PRIORS WHEN LOCALIZING AND MANIPULATING INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE RINK, RYAN J 28d overdue
18504927 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEFINITION OF A ZONE OF DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR WITH A CONTINUUM OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS AND LOCATIONS WITHIN THE SAME MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 8d overdue
18846359 CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ESTIMATION OF PAYLOAD ENGAGEMENT/DISENGAGEMENT SENSING RANDAZZO, THOMAS
18838795 SAFETY FIELD SWITCHING BASED ON END EFFECTOR CONDITIONS IN VEHICLES GLENN III, FRANK T

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18852369 A SYSTEM FOR AMRS THAT LEVERAGES PRIORS WHEN LOCALIZING AND MANIPULATING INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE RINK, RYAN J 28d overdue
18849629 ROBOTIC VEHICLE NAVIGATION WITH DYNAMIC PATH ADJUSTING MOSCOLA, MATTHEW JOHN 17d overdue
18928423 LATERALLY OPERATING PAYLOAD HANDLING DEVICE JOHNS, HILARY LYNN
18846359 CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ESTIMATION OF PAYLOAD ENGAGEMENT/DISENGAGEMENT SENSING RANDAZZO, THOMAS
18529109 JUST-IN-TIME DESTINATION AND ROUTE PLANNING JONES, JODI MARIE
18527715 GENERATION OF "PLAIN LANGUAGE" DESCRIPTIONS SUMMARY OF AUTOMATION LOGIC CULLEN, TANNER L

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3663 2
3657 2
3619 1
3662 1
3666 1
3656 1
3669 1
3653 1
3658 1
2194 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18928423 LATERALLY OPERATING PAYLOAD HANDLING DEVICE JOHNS, HILARY LYNN §103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 28, 2024
18928311 VEHICLE OBJECT-ENGAGEMENT SCANNING SYSTEM AND METHOD FITZHARRIS, KATHERINE MARIE DP Non-Final OA Pending Oct 28, 2024
18852369 A SYSTEM FOR AMRS THAT LEVERAGES PRIORS WHEN LOCALIZING AND MANIPULATING INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE RINK, RYAN J 3619 §102§103 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending Sep 27, 2024
18849629 ROBOTIC VEHICLE NAVIGATION WITH DYNAMIC PATH ADJUSTING MOSCOLA, MATTHEW JOHN 3663 §103 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Sep 23, 2024
18849310 LANE GRID SETUP FOR AUTONOMOUS MOBILE ROBOT ANWARI, MACEEH 3663 §103 Final Rejection Pending Sep 20, 2024
18846359 CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ESTIMATION OF PAYLOAD ENGAGEMENT/DISENGAGEMENT SENSING RANDAZZO, THOMAS §102§112 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 12, 2024
18842229 LOCALIZATION OF HORIZONTAL INFRASTRUCTURE USING POINT CLOUDS PEPPER, ANDREW KILLIAN 3657 §103 Final Rejection Pending Aug 28, 2024
18839465 SEGMENTATION OF DETECTED OBJECTS INTO OBSTRUCTIONS AND ALLOWED OBJECTS PEPPER, ANDREW KILLIAN 3657 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 19, 2024
18838795 SAFETY FIELD SWITCHING BASED ON END EFFECTOR CONDITIONS IN VEHICLES GLENN III, FRANK T 3662 §102§103 Final Rejection Pending Aug 15, 2024
18529109 JUST-IN-TIME DESTINATION AND ROUTE PLANNING JONES, JODI MARIE 3666 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 05, 2023
18527715 GENERATION OF "PLAIN LANGUAGE" DESCRIPTIONS SUMMARY OF AUTOMATION LOGIC CULLEN, TANNER L 3656 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 04, 2023
18524217 HYBRID AUTONOMOUS SYSTEM AND HUMAN INTEGRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD KHATIB, RAMI 3669 §102 Final Rejection Pending Nov 30, 2023
18504927 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEFINITION OF A ZONE OF DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR WITH A CONTINUUM OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS AND LOCATIONS WITHIN THE SAME MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 3653 §102§112 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Nov 08, 2023
18502221 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZED TRAFFIC FLOW THROUGH INTERSECTIONS WITH CONDITIONAL CONVOYING BASED ON PATH NETWORK ANALYSIS WOOD, BLAKE ANDREW 3658 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 06, 2023
18373544 SHARED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD ANYA, CHARLES E 2194 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 27, 2023

Managing Seegrid Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month