Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Seegrid Corporation

7 pending office actions • 6 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
6
Medium (86%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (71%)
§102 only1 (14%)
§112 only1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
29% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 1 55.4% +41.0%
RINK, RYAN J 1 78.1% +10.7%
MOSCOLA, MATTHEW JOHN 1 65.7% +16.0%
ALATA, YASSIN 1 66.5% +14.1%
CHANDRASIRI, UPUL PRIYADARSHAN 1 12.5% -16.7%
JEON, JAE UK 1 75.2% +47.5%
MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 1 83.6% +13.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18504927 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEFINITION OF A ZONE OF DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR WITH A CONTINUUM OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS AND LOCATIONS WITHIN THE SAME MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 8d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18723598 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTIONS IN A TARGETED DROP ZONE CHANDRASIRI, UPUL PRIYADARSHAN

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18848565 EXTRINSIC CALIBRATION OF A VEHICLE-MOUNTED SENSOR USING NATURAL VEHICLE FEATURES ALATA, YASSIN 80d overdue
18527730 SYSTEM FOR PROCESS FLOW TEMPLATING AND DUPLICATION OF TASKS WITHIN MATERIAL FLOW AUTOMATION JEON, JAE UK 30d overdue
18852369 A SYSTEM FOR AMRS THAT LEVERAGES PRIORS WHEN LOCALIZING AND MANIPULATING INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE RINK, RYAN J 28d overdue
18849629 ROBOTIC VEHICLE NAVIGATION WITH DYNAMIC PATH ADJUSTING MOSCOLA, MATTHEW JOHN 17d overdue
18504927 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEFINITION OF A ZONE OF DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR WITH A CONTINUUM OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS AND LOCATIONS WITHIN THE SAME MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 8d overdue
18862690 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING COMPLEX RUNTIME PATH NETWORKS FROM INCOMPLETE DEMONSTRATION OF TRAINED ACTIVITIES BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 22d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3665 2
3619 1
3663 1
2426 1
2193 1
3653 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18862690 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING COMPLEX RUNTIME PATH NETWORKS FROM INCOMPLETE DEMONSTRATION OF TRAINED ACTIVITIES BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 3665 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Nov 04, 2024
18852369 A SYSTEM FOR AMRS THAT LEVERAGES PRIORS WHEN LOCALIZING AND MANIPULATING INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE RINK, RYAN J 3619 §103 Non-Final OA 28d overdue Pending Sep 27, 2024
18849629 ROBOTIC VEHICLE NAVIGATION WITH DYNAMIC PATH ADJUSTING MOSCOLA, MATTHEW JOHN 3663 §103 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Sep 23, 2024
18848565 EXTRINSIC CALIBRATION OF A VEHICLE-MOUNTED SENSOR USING NATURAL VEHICLE FEATURES ALATA, YASSIN 2426 §103 Non-Final OA 80d overdue Pending Sep 19, 2024
18723598 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTIONS IN A TARGETED DROP ZONE CHANDRASIRI, UPUL PRIYADARSHAN 3665 §102 Final Rejection Pending Jun 24, 2024
18527730 SYSTEM FOR PROCESS FLOW TEMPLATING AND DUPLICATION OF TASKS WITHIN MATERIAL FLOW AUTOMATION JEON, JAE UK 2193 §103 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Dec 04, 2023
18504927 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEFINITION OF A ZONE OF DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR WITH A CONTINUUM OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS AND LOCATIONS WITHIN THE SAME MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 3653 §112 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Nov 08, 2023

Managing Seegrid Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month