Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Seegrid Corporation

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

15 pending office actions • 8 art units • 15 examiners • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Seegrid Corporation is currently handling 15 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are spread across 15 distinct examiners, meaning that no two pending matters are currently assigned to the same individual, which necessitates a diverse set of prosecution tactics. The portfolio's pending actions are distributed among 7 distinct art units, showing a broad technical footprint within its primary technology area and a need to manage various technical standards across the USPTO.

RACHEL ANNE OMETZ is identified as the busiest examiner for the corporation, though she is responsible for only 1 pending office action, highlighting the high degree of examiner dispersion across the company's active cases. With 15 pending office actions and multiple examiners, the corporation must maintain a high level of consistency in its legal arguments while addressing the unique concerns of each individual. The distribution across 7 distinct art units further underscores the complexity of managing this portfolio, as each unit may have different examination timelines and internal guidelines.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (60%)
6
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (27%)
§103 only5 (33%)
§102 only1 (7%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
73% of docket
4
Business / Other
27% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE 1 73.2% +30.2%
BROTHERS, LAURENCE RAPHAEL 1 88.8% +16.2%
BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 1 54.1% +39.1%
JOHNS, HILARY LYNN 1 81.9% +15.8%
RINK, RYAN J 1 78.4% +10.8%
MOSCOLA, MATTHEW JOHN 1 64.8% +15.8%
RANDAZZO, THOMAS 1 86.7% +12.3%
LIN, ABBY YEE 1 65.0% +14.8%
LEVY, MERRITT E 1 32.3% +33.5%
CHANDRASIRI, UPUL PRIYADARSHAN 1 8.7% -14.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18928423 LATERALLY OPERATING PAYLOAD HANDLING DEVICE JOHNS, HILARY LYNN —

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18849629 ROBOTIC VEHICLE NAVIGATION WITH DYNAMIC PATH ADJUSTING MOSCOLA, MATTHEW JOHN 17d overdue
18862690 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING COMPLEX RUNTIME PATH NETWORKS FROM INCOMPLETE DEMONSTRATION OF TRAINED ACTIVITIES BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 22d
19000867 OBJECT DETECTION AND LOCALIZATION FROM THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) POINT CLOUDS USING FIXED SCALE (FS) IMAGES OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE —
18975477 ROBOTIC VEHICLE FORKS-ENGAGED SENSOR AND METHOD OF USING SAME BROTHERS, LAURENCE RAPHAEL —
18846359 CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ESTIMATION OF PAYLOAD ENGAGEMENT/DISENGAGEMENT SENSING RANDAZZO, THOMAS —
18842229 LOCALIZATION OF HORIZONTAL INFRASTRUCTURE USING POINT CLOUDS LIN, ABBY YEE —
18723598 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTIONS IN A TARGETED DROP ZONE CHANDRASIRI, UPUL PRIYADARSHAN —
18527715 GENERATION OF "PLAIN LANGUAGE" DESCRIPTIONS SUMMARY OF AUTOMATION LOGIC CULLEN, TANNER L —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18852369 A SYSTEM FOR AMRS THAT LEVERAGES PRIORS WHEN LOCALIZING AND MANIPULATING INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE RINK, RYAN J 28d overdue
18849629 ROBOTIC VEHICLE NAVIGATION WITH DYNAMIC PATH ADJUSTING MOSCOLA, MATTHEW JOHN 17d overdue
18862690 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING COMPLEX RUNTIME PATH NETWORKS FROM INCOMPLETE DEMONSTRATION OF TRAINED ACTIVITIES BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 22d
19000867 OBJECT DETECTION AND LOCALIZATION FROM THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) POINT CLOUDS USING FIXED SCALE (FS) IMAGES OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE —
18975477 ROBOTIC VEHICLE FORKS-ENGAGED SENSOR AND METHOD OF USING SAME BROTHERS, LAURENCE RAPHAEL —
18928423 LATERALLY OPERATING PAYLOAD HANDLING DEVICE JOHNS, HILARY LYNN —
18846359 CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ESTIMATION OF PAYLOAD ENGAGEMENT/DISENGAGEMENT SENSING RANDAZZO, THOMAS —
18842229 LOCALIZATION OF HORIZONTAL INFRASTRUCTURE USING POINT CLOUDS LIN, ABBY YEE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3665 3
3663 2
3619 1
3657 1
3666 1
3656 1
3627 1
3669 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19000867 OBJECT DETECTION AND LOCALIZATION FROM THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) POINT CLOUDS USING FIXED SCALE (FS) IMAGES OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 24, 2024
18975477 ROBOTIC VEHICLE FORKS-ENGAGED SENSOR AND METHOD OF USING SAME BROTHERS, LAURENCE RAPHAEL — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 10, 2024
18862690 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING COMPLEX RUNTIME PATH NETWORKS FROM INCOMPLETE DEMONSTRATION OF TRAINED ACTIVITIES BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 3665 §102§103 Final Rejection 22d Pending Nov 04, 2024
18928423 LATERALLY OPERATING PAYLOAD HANDLING DEVICE JOHNS, HILARY LYNN — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 28, 2024
18852369 A SYSTEM FOR AMRS THAT LEVERAGES PRIORS WHEN LOCALIZING AND MANIPULATING INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE RINK, RYAN J 3619 §103 Non-Final OA 28d overdue Pending Sep 27, 2024
18849629 ROBOTIC VEHICLE NAVIGATION WITH DYNAMIC PATH ADJUSTING MOSCOLA, MATTHEW JOHN 3663 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Sep 23, 2024
18846359 CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ESTIMATION OF PAYLOAD ENGAGEMENT/DISENGAGEMENT SENSING RANDAZZO, THOMAS — §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 12, 2024
18842229 LOCALIZATION OF HORIZONTAL INFRASTRUCTURE USING POINT CLOUDS LIN, ABBY YEE 3657 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 28, 2024
18723611 A HYBRID, CONTEXT-AWARE LOCALIZATION SYSTEM FOR GROUND VEHICLES LEVY, MERRITT E 3663 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 24, 2024
18723598 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTIONS IN A TARGETED DROP ZONE CHANDRASIRI, UPUL PRIYADARSHAN 3665 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 24, 2024
18529109 JUST-IN-TIME DESTINATION AND ROUTE PLANNING JONES, JODI MARIE 3666 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2023
18527669 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MATERIAL FLOW AUTOMATION THOMPSON, JOSEPH LEIGH 3665 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 04, 2023
18527715 GENERATION OF "PLAIN LANGUAGE" DESCRIPTIONS SUMMARY OF AUTOMATION LOGIC CULLEN, TANNER L 3656 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 04, 2023
18526538 CONFIGURING A SYSTEM THAT HANDLES UNCERTAINTY WITH HUMAN AND LOGIC COLLABORATION IN A MATERIAL FLOW AUTOMATION SOLUTION DELIGI, VANESSA LIMA 3627 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 01, 2023
18524217 HYBRID AUTONOMOUS SYSTEM AND HUMAN INTEGRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD KHATIB, RAMI 3669 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 30, 2023

Managing Seegrid Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month