Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 25, 2026

Sslm Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ROLDAN RAMOS, CHRISTIAN 1 69.2% +16.1%
WANG, PIN JAN 1 60.9% +47.0%
WALKE, AMANDA C 1 88.4% +8.6%
HANSEN, JARED A 1 54.5% +46.5%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18203546 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY SEPARATOR WALKE, AMANDA C 83d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18385961 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY FUNCTIONAL LAYER ROLDAN RAMOS, CHRISTIAN —
18385963 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY LAMINATED SEPARATOR WANG, PIN JAN —
18324224 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY LAMINATED SEPARATOR HANSEN, JARED A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1717 1
1722 1
1723 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18385961 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY FUNCTIONAL LAYER ROLDAN RAMOS, CHRISTIAN — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 01, 2023
18385963 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY LAMINATED SEPARATOR WANG, PIN JAN 1717 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 01, 2023
18203546 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY SEPARATOR WALKE, AMANDA C 1722 §102§103 Non-Final OA 83d Pending May 30, 2023
18324224 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY LAMINATED SEPARATOR HANSEN, JARED A 1723 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 26, 2023

Managing Sslm Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month