Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Sterlite Technologies Limited

10 pending office actions • 4 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

9
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (9)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
9
Medium (90%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (10%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only7 (70%)
§102 only2 (20%)
No statute on record1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
20% of docket
1
Information Tech
10% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
6
Semiconductors
60% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
10% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHU, CHRIS H 2 53.1% +9.6%
DEHGHAN, QUEENIE S 1 61.8% +10.9%
PENG, CHARLIE YU 1 75.4% +12.9%
HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT 1 76.5% +23.1%
LALCHINTHANG, VANNEILIAN 1 79.0% +13.6%
THOMASON, DARBY MARGARET 1 78.3% +29.4%
PATEL, PREET BAKUL 1 20.0% -33.3%
LEPISTO, RYAN A 1 87.8% +8.2%
HERRING, LISA L 1 72.6% +16.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18081509 LOW WEIGHT OPTICAL FIBER CABLE LEPISTO, RYAN A 52d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18147323 OPTICAL FIBER CABLE WITH EMBEDDED STRENGTH MEMBERS PATEL, PREET BAKUL 43d overdue

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18177071 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN OPTICAL FIBER USING NON-CONTACT PNEUMATIC LEVITATION HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT 295d overdue
18169261 ACCESS NETWORK DISCOVERY AND SELECTION LALCHINTHANG, VANNEILIAN 169d overdue
17214857 OPTICAL FIBRE DRAW FURNACE HERRING, LISA L 78d overdue
18340846 OPTICAL FIBER RIBBON WITH A PASSIVE LAYER PENG, CHARLIE YU 72d overdue
18471160 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONSTRAINING AN OPTICAL FIBER IN A DRAW TOWER DEHGHAN, QUEENIE S 16d overdue
18165998 AERIAL DROP OPTICAL FIBRE CABLE THOMASON, DARBY MARGARET 40d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2874 6
1741 2
3723 1
2414 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18471160 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONSTRAINING AN OPTICAL FIBER IN A DRAW TOWER DEHGHAN, QUEENIE S 1741 §103 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending Sep 20, 2023
18340846 OPTICAL FIBER RIBBON WITH A PASSIVE LAYER PENG, CHARLIE YU 2874 §103 Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Jun 24, 2023
18177071 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN OPTICAL FIBER USING NON-CONTACT PNEUMATIC LEVITATION HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT 3723 §102 Non-Final OA 295d overdue Pending Mar 01, 2023
18169261 ACCESS NETWORK DISCOVERY AND SELECTION LALCHINTHANG, VANNEILIAN 2414 Non-Final OA 169d overdue Pending Feb 15, 2023
18165998 AERIAL DROP OPTICAL FIBRE CABLE THOMASON, DARBY MARGARET 2874 §103 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Feb 08, 2023
18148547 ULTRA-LOW LOSS OPTICAL FIBERS FOR LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS CHU, CHRIS H 2874 §103 Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Dec 30, 2022
18147323 OPTICAL FIBER CABLE WITH EMBEDDED STRENGTH MEMBERS PATEL, PREET BAKUL 2874 §103 Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending Dec 28, 2022
18081509 LOW WEIGHT OPTICAL FIBER CABLE LEPISTO, RYAN A 2874 §103 Final Rejection 52d overdue Pending Dec 14, 2022
17214857 OPTICAL FIBRE DRAW FURNACE HERRING, LISA L 1741 §102 Non-Final OA 78d overdue Pending Mar 27, 2021
17175326 OPTICAL FIBRE HAVING CENTERLINE CORE PROFILE CHU, CHRIS H 2874 §103 Final Rejection 103d overdue Pending Feb 12, 2021

Managing Sterlite Technologies Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month