Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Synchrony Bank

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

26 pending office actions • 11 art units • 24 examiners • 0 of 26 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 29 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Synchrony Bank currently faces 28 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 12 distinct art units, showing that the bank's intellectual property interests span several specialized divisions within the USPTO. The prosecution effort involves 26 distinct examiners, which indicates a high degree of fragmentation in how the portfolio is being reviewed.

The busiest examiner, PRESTON, JOHN O, is only handling 2 pending office actions out of the total 28. This low concentration suggests that the bank cannot rely on a singular strategy for a specific examiner to move a large portion of its portfolio forward. Instead, the legal team must prepare for 26 different examination styles, as the vast majority of examiners are likely handling only one pending action each.

Navigating 12 distinct art units requires an understanding of various procedural trends within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. Because 26 distinct examiners are involved, the bank experiences a nearly one-to-one ratio of examiners to pending matters. This lack of examiner overlap, emphasized by the busiest examiner having only 2 actions, suggests a need for highly individualized case management to resolve the pending inventory.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

26
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
13
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
4
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 60 days (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

21
Hard (81%)
3
Medium (12%)
2
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only9 (35%)
§101 + other12 (46%)
§103 only3 (12%)
§112 only1 (4%)
Double-patenting only1 (4%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
4% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
19
Mechanical / Eng
73% of docket
6
Business / Other
23% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

260 h
Manual time on pending OAs
52 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
91 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PRESTON, JOHN O 2 28.4% +7.7%
MUSTAFA, MOHAMMED H 2 35.2% +30.2%
KANERVO, VIRPI H 1 47.5% +47.6%
SHAHABI, ARI ARASTOO 1 56.7% +41.2%
LONG, MEREDITH A 1 43.2% +21.1%
BEKERMAN, MICHAEL 1 32.5% +31.1%
VIG, NARESH 1 36.4% +42.9%
MARIAM, DANIEL G 1 90.6% +10.4%
BAGGOT, BREFFNI 1 35.3% +25.8%
SHAAWAT, MAYASA A. 1 87.6% +21.4%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19019786 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR READING FLAT CARDS MARIAM, DANIEL G —
19004258 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC AUTHENTICATION ACROSS DISPARATE SYSTEMS SHAAWAT, MAYASA A. —

Hard Cases (21)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18045867 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLASSIFYING IMBALANCED DATA GAW, MARK H 191d overdue
18425377 DYNAMIC PATTERN RECOGNITION ANALYSIS IN REAL-TIME DURING CONTINUING DATA EXTRACTION KAZIMI, HANI M 31d overdue
18792253 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GRADUATION OF DUAL-FEATURE PAYMENT INSTRUMENTS MUSTAFA, MOHAMMED H 17d overdue
18756331 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED ENROLLMENT ORCHESTRATION PRESTON, JOHN O 8d overdue
18955436 DETERMINING CONDITIONS AND INCENTIVES ASSOCIATED WITH INSTALLMENT OPTIONS SNIDER, SCOTT 5d overdue
18975256 APPLICATION USER INTERFACE FRAMEWORK FOR ACTIVATING REVOLVING ACCOUNTS PRESTON, JOHN O 40d
18346493 DYNAMICALLY DETERMINING REAL-TIME OFFERS MUSTAFA, MOHAMMED H 40d
18975327 TRACKING FULFILLMENT OF OBJECTS IN A TRANSACTION GODBOLD, DAVID GARRISON 48d

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18792253 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GRADUATION OF DUAL-FEATURE PAYMENT INSTRUMENTS MUSTAFA, MOHAMMED H 17d overdue
18346493 DYNAMICALLY DETERMINING REAL-TIME OFFERS MUSTAFA, MOHAMMED H 40d
19055141 DYNAMIC OFFERS APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES LONG, MEREDITH A 56d
19222105 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC GENERATION OF SECURITY CODES FOR INSTRUMENT UTILIZATIONS KANERVO, VIRPI H —
19170166 Integrated Hosted Solutions SHAHABI, ARI ARASTOO —
19055168 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING ALLOCATION OF POINTS BEKERMAN, MICHAEL —
19047995 APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES FOR CLUSTER-GENERATED OFFERS USING MACHINE LEARNING VIG, NARESH —
19019786 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR READING FLAT CARDS MARIAM, DANIEL G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3693 5
3691 3
3622 2
3621 2
3694 2
3697 1
2433 1
3628 1
3695 1
3688 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19222105 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC GENERATION OF SECURITY CODES FOR INSTRUMENT UTILIZATIONS KANERVO, VIRPI H 3691 §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending May 29, 2025
19170166 Integrated Hosted Solutions SHAHABI, ARI ARASTOO 3697 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 04, 2025
19055141 DYNAMIC OFFERS APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES LONG, MEREDITH A 3622 §101 Final Rejection 56d Pending Feb 17, 2025
19055168 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING ALLOCATION OF POINTS BEKERMAN, MICHAEL — §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 17, 2025
19047995 APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES FOR CLUSTER-GENERATED OFFERS USING MACHINE LEARNING VIG, NARESH 3622 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 07, 2025
19019786 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR READING FLAT CARDS MARIAM, DANIEL G — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 14, 2025
19016068 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING OF PROMOTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH DIGITAL PURCHASING BAGGOT, BREFFNI 3621 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 10, 2025
19004258 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC AUTHENTICATION ACROSS DISPARATE SYSTEMS SHAAWAT, MAYASA A. 2433 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 28, 2024
18975256 APPLICATION USER INTERFACE FRAMEWORK FOR ACTIVATING REVOLVING ACCOUNTS PRESTON, JOHN O 3693 §101 Final Rejection 40d Pending Dec 10, 2024
18975327 TRACKING FULFILLMENT OF OBJECTS IN A TRANSACTION GODBOLD, DAVID GARRISON 3628 §101 Non-Final OA 48d Pending Dec 10, 2024
18955436 DETERMINING CONDITIONS AND INCENTIVES ASSOCIATED WITH INSTALLMENT OPTIONS SNIDER, SCOTT 3621 §101§103 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Nov 21, 2024
18951838 SECURE MODAL BASED DIGITAL INSTALLMENTS HUDSON, MARLA LAVETTE 3694 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 19, 2024
18915441 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATIC CLAIMS SETTLEMENT MALHOTRA, SANJEEV 3691 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18830314 MULTI BOT ARCHITECTURE FOR AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING WOOD, WILLIAM C — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2024
18792253 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GRADUATION OF DUAL-FEATURE PAYMENT INSTRUMENTS MUSTAFA, MOHAMMED H 3693 §101§112 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Aug 01, 2024
18762756 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DATA SHARE REQUESTS HASTY, NICHOLAS — §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2024
18756331 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED ENROLLMENT ORCHESTRATION PRESTON, JOHN O 3693 §101 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Jun 27, 2024
18753243 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATIC GRADUATION OF SECURED INSTRUMENTS HASBROUCK, MERRITT J 3695 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 25, 2024
18753226 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME DYNAMIC SECURED PAYMENT INSTRUMENT PROCESSING YONO, RAVEN E 3694 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 25, 2024
18739461 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION FOR INTENT SIGNAL OBJECT GENERATION BLACKBURN, CONNOR IMIOLA — §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 11, 2024
18651726 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING TRANSACTIONAL PROMOTIONS MEYER, JACQUELINE CHRISTINE — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 01, 2024
18438843 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FLEXIBLE OBJECT ACTIVATION PRESTON, ASHLEY DAWN 3688 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 12, 2024
18425377 DYNAMIC PATTERN RECOGNITION ANALYSIS IN REAL-TIME DURING CONTINUING DATA EXTRACTION KAZIMI, HANI M 3691 §101§103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Jan 29, 2024
18346493 DYNAMICALLY DETERMINING REAL-TIME OFFERS MUSTAFA, MOHAMMED H 3693 §101 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Jul 03, 2023
18045867 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLASSIFYING IMBALANCED DATA GAW, MARK H 3693 §101 Non-Final OA 191d overdue Pending Oct 12, 2022
17350388 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA SECURITY WITH MODULAR WEBSITE INTEGRATION ABDULLAEV, AMANULLA 3692 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2021

Managing Synchrony Bank's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month