Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

UNIVERSIDADE DE COIMBRA

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Networking & Security

6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

UNIVERSIDADE DE COIMBRA has 6 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are spread across 4 distinct art units, indicating a diverse technical focus for the university's portfolio. The prosecution is handled by 6 distinct examiners, with each examiner responsible for exactly one of the 6 pending actions. This distribution requires the management of 6 separate examiner relationships.

BLAISE, BRADFORD CHRISTOPHER is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. This distribution suggests that the university must manage relationships with 6 different examiners across 4 separate art units. The lack of concentration among examiners means that prosecution strategies must be tailored to the specific tendencies of each individual involved in the 6 active cases. With 4 distinct art units involved, the university is engaging with multiple specialized examination branches. This decentralized structure for pending office actions means that the university's success depends on navigating unique examination paths with 1 pending office action per examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (17%)
Double-patenting + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
50% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BLAISE, BRADFORD CHRISTOPHER 1 60.7% +31.5%
EGLOFF, PETER RICHARD 1 43.2% +32.2%
SIMITOSKI, MICHAEL J 1 80.3% +28.4%
HOERNER, PAUL ELLSWORTH 1 50.0% +62.1%
KWAK, DEAN P 1 58.7% +37.1%
LI, AIQUN 1 63.8% +23.1%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18255458 SENSING APPARATUS AND METHOD KWAK, DEAN P 16d
18880121 METHOD TO OBTAIN A SKIN ELECTRODE PATCH AND RESPECTIVE SKIN ELECTRODE PATCH BLAISE, BRADFORD CHRISTOPHER —
18869875 BIDIRECTIONAL FEEDBACK SYSTEM AND RESPECTIVE METHOD EGLOFF, PETER RICHARD —
18765079 Physical Layer Security SIMITOSKI, MICHAEL J —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18026275 WATER-SOLUBLE TRYPTHANTRIN DERIVATIVES FOR REDOX FLOW BATTERIES LI, AIQUN 56d overdue
18255458 SENSING APPARATUS AND METHOD KWAK, DEAN P 16d
18880121 METHOD TO OBTAIN A SKIN ELECTRODE PATCH AND RESPECTIVE SKIN ELECTRODE PATCH BLAISE, BRADFORD CHRISTOPHER —
18869875 BIDIRECTIONAL FEEDBACK SYSTEM AND RESPECTIVE METHOD EGLOFF, PETER RICHARD —
18765079 Physical Layer Security SIMITOSKI, MICHAEL J —
18690528 POLYMERIC NANOPARTICLE FORMULATIONS FOR TARGETED MRNA DELIVERY HOERNER, PAUL ELLSWORTH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2493 1
1611 1
1798 1
1766 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18880121 METHOD TO OBTAIN A SKIN ELECTRODE PATCH AND RESPECTIVE SKIN ELECTRODE PATCH BLAISE, BRADFORD CHRISTOPHER — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
18869875 BIDIRECTIONAL FEEDBACK SYSTEM AND RESPECTIVE METHOD EGLOFF, PETER RICHARD — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 27, 2024
18765079 Physical Layer Security SIMITOSKI, MICHAEL J 2493 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 05, 2024
18690528 POLYMERIC NANOPARTICLE FORMULATIONS FOR TARGETED MRNA DELIVERY HOERNER, PAUL ELLSWORTH 1611 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 08, 2024
18255458 SENSING APPARATUS AND METHOD KWAK, DEAN P 1798 §102§112Other Non-Final OA 16d Pending Jun 01, 2023
18026275 WATER-SOLUBLE TRYPTHANTRIN DERIVATIVES FOR REDOX FLOW BATTERIES LI, AIQUN 1766 §102 Non-Final OA 56d overdue Pending Mar 14, 2023

Managing UNIVERSIDADE DE COIMBRA's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month